ON
← Back to feed
‘The worst rotted fish you ever smelled in your lifetime, times 100’ - reek of ancient sauce stinks out town
NZ🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

‘The worst rotted fish you ever smelled in your lifetime, times 100’ - reek of ancient sauce stinks out town

The headline describes a strong odor in a town, comparing it to 'the worst rotted fish you ever smelled in your lifetime, times 100.' The phrase 'reek of ancient sauce' suggests a persistent and intense smell, possibly related to food waste or industrial activity. While the article does not provide specific details about the source of the odor or any official investigation, the emphasis on the intensity of the smell indicates a significant local concern. The headline uses hyperbolic language to convey the severity of the situation, which could be interpreted as a dramatic portrayal of the issue.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Stuff logoStuffIndependentProgressiveFactual 65Objective 45yesterday
‘The worst rotted fish you ever smelled in your lifetime, times 100’ - reek of ancient sauce stinks out town

The headline describes a strong odor in a town, comparing it to 'the worst rotted fish you ever smelled in your lifetime, times 100.' The phrase 'reek of ancient sauce' suggests a persistent and intense smell, possibly related to food waste or industrial activity. While the article does not provide specific details about the source of the odor or any official investigation, the emphasis on the intensity of the smell indicates a significant local concern. The headline uses hyperbolic language to convey the severity of the situation, which could be interpreted as a dramatic portrayal of the issue.

Bias read (Progressive): The headline employs vivid, emotionally charged language ('worst rotted fish', 'times 100') that emphasizes the negative impact of the odor on the community. This framing leans toward highlighting the problem rather than balancing perspectives or providing objective context. The use of such strong,煽

Why factuality (65): The article mentions a strong odor described in hyperbolic terms but provides no concrete details about the cause, location, or response to the smell. Without specific information, the facts remain vague and unverified. However, since this is a descriptive piece based on public perception, some leve

Why objectivity (45): The headline uses highly emotive and exaggerated language ('worst rotted fish... times 100') which frames the situation dramatically and subjectively. This creates an impression of extreme negativity without balanced reporting or objective evidence.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories