ON
← Back to feed
The US got Meta to change Instagram and Facebook. Europe wants in.
BE🏛️ PoliticsProgressive3 days ago

The US got Meta to change Instagram and Facebook. Europe wants in.

The European Commission is scrutinizing whether the changes Meta agreed to with 47 U.S. states in a $18 billion settlement on youth safety apply equally within the EU. The U.S. agreement requires Meta to limit daily usage for minors, verify user ages more strictly, and disable cosmetic filters for teens. While these measures overlap with provisions of the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA), the EU has been slower to enforce them. Former commissioner Thierry Breton criticized the delay, urging stronger enforcement. Some lawmakers argue that EU users may receive less protection than U.S. users if the EU does not align its regulations with the U.S. settlement.

The European Union is pushing for stricter regulations on Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, following a major settlement reached with 47 U.S. states. This agreement, valued at $18 billion, compels Meta to implement new safeguards aimed at protecting young users from the potential harms of excessive screen time and manipulative design features. However, European officials argue that these changes fall short of their own regulatory standards and demand that Meta adopt similar measures within the EU. The U.S. settlement marks a significant step forward in addressing concerns about how social media platforms affect children. Under the terms of the agreement, Meta will introduce limitations on daily usage for minors, enhance age verification processes, and disable certain cosmetic filters for teenage users. These adjustments are intended to reduce the risk of addiction and exposure to harmful content among younger audiences. The deal represents the culmination of a protracted legal battle involving multiple state attorneys general, highlighting growing scrutiny of big tech companies' practices in the United States. From the perspective of European regulators, this outcome presents a complex situation. While they acknowledge the progress made in the U.S., they feel compelled to demonstrate that their own regulatory framework can achieve comparable or greater results. The European Commission has long sought to hold Meta accountable for alleged violations of the Digital Services Act (DSA), a comprehensive regulation designed to govern online platforms and ensure safer internet environments for all users. Despite ongoing investigations and discussions, the EU has yet to secure explicit commitments from Meta regarding compliance with these rules. Former European Commissioner Thierry Breton emphasized the urgency of enforcing the DSA, noting that U.S. courts have already mandated several key reforms that align with the EU's legislative goals. He highlighted the irony that many of the measures required by the U.S. settlement were already included in the DSA, suggesting that the EU should accelerate its enforcement efforts to match the pace of judicial action in America. German politician Andreas Schwab echoed this sentiment, advocating for alignment between Meta's policies in different regions to ensure consistent levels of user protection across borders. In response to the recent developments, Spanish lawmaker Laura Ballarín Cereza questioned why Meta appears willing to commit to changes exclusively for U.S. users while continuing negotiations with EU authorities over identical issues. She expressed concern that EU citizens might end up with less robust protections compared to their American counterparts. The European Commission responded by reaffirming its commitment to engaging with Meta and encouraging the company to consider offering additional assurances within the EU context. Meta has consistently challenged the allegations raised by the European Commission, asserting that its current measures are sufficient to address the concerns outlined in previous communications. Should the company fail to meet the expectations of EU regulators, it could face substantial financial penalties, up to 6 percent of its global annual revenue, potentially reaching $12 billion. Although this figure pales in comparison to the $18 billion settlement in the U.S., it underscores the gravity of the situation for Meta as it navigates divergent regulatory landscapes across continents. As the debate continues, the focus remains on ensuring that the rights and safety of users are upheld globally. The European Union aims to establish itself as a leader in digital governance, leveraging its regulatory tools to influence corporate behavior and promote responsible innovation. With the spotlight on Meta, the coming months will reveal whether the company can adapt its strategies to satisfy both U.S. and EU requirements, ultimately shaping the future of online interactions worldwide.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Politico Europe logoPolitico EuropeIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 783 days ago
The US got Meta to change Instagram and Facebook. Europe wants in.

The European Commission is scrutinizing whether the changes Meta agreed to with 47 U.S. states in a $18 billion settlement on youth safety apply equally within the EU. The U.S. agreement requires Meta to limit daily usage for minors, verify user ages more strictly, and disable cosmetic filters for teens. While these measures overlap with provisions of the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA), the EU has been slower to enforce them. Former commissioner Thierry Breton criticized the delay, urging stronger enforcement. Some lawmakers argue that EU users may receive less protection than U.S. users if the EU does not align its regulations with the U.S. settlement.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the EU's regulatory efforts as being hindered by bureaucratic delays compared to the swift action of U.S. courts. It highlights criticism of the EU Commission for not enforcing existing laws effectively and suggests that EU users might have weaker protections than U.S. users. This

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the $18 billion settlement between Meta and 47 U.S. states, detailing the proposed changes to Instagram and Facebook aimed at protecting minors. It references the Digital Services Act (DSA) and mentions former Commissioner Thierry Breton's reaction, aligning with known

Why objectivity (78): The article presents the situation from the perspective of the European Commission and includes commentary from a former commissioner, which introduces a slight editorial angle. While it remains largely factual, the emphasis on the EU's regulatory challenges and the comparison with U.S. progress lea

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories