ON
← Back to feed
The Ugly Truth Hiding Behind Picture Perfect Family Influencers
United States🏛️ PoliticsProgressive21 hr. ago

The Ugly Truth Hiding Behind Picture Perfect Family Influencers

The article discusses the pressures and ethical dilemmas faced by families who become influencers by documenting their children's lives online. It uses personal anecdotes and insights from the book 'Like, Follow, Subscribe' by Fortesa Latifi to explore how some families, such as the LaBrants and a pseudonymous influencer named Sam, navigate the challenges of monetizing their children's content. The piece highlights issues such as manipulation, financial incentives, and the emotional toll on both parents and children. It also references extreme cases, including Ruby Franke's legal troubles, to illustrate the broader implications of turning parenting into a business.

A family vacation meant to capture joy and relaxation became a stage for content creation, according to a personal account shared by a mother who was 36 weeks pregnant with her third child. During the trip, her husband used a GoPro to document every moment, ranging from the journey itself to the children's playful moments in the water, mini-golf sessions, and even interviews with family members. After editing the footage, adding music, and presenting it as a slice of ideal family life, the resulting videos were uploaded to YouTube. Despite the effort, these videos garnered only around 100 views, with half coming from family members. While the mother cherishes the memories, she expresses concern over the pressure placed on her children, who, despite wanting to become influencers, may not fully understand the implications. The narrative reflects broader concerns raised in “Like, Follow, Subscribe,” a book by Fortesa Latifi that explores the impact of families who constantly showcase their children online for engagement. The book features several families, including the well-known LaBrants, whose experiences highlight the complex dynamics of parenting in the digital age. Children interviewed in the book often express mixed emotions about being part of such public displays. While some feel pressured to participate due to the financial benefits, others experience guilt or discomfort. The book underscores how the pursuit of visibility and income can blur ethical boundaries, especially when involving minors. One extreme example involves Ruby Franke, known for her YouTube channel “8 Passengers.” Franke recently faced legal action over alleged child abuse, illustrating the potential consequences of prioritizing content creation over child welfare. Another case involves an influencer referred to only as Sam, who reportedly bribed her children with $500 to appear in promotional videos. When the children refused, Sam allegedly resorted to manipulation and guilt-tripping, framing the act as a necessary part of their family’s livelihood. She described the situation as akin to working on a farm, where children would be expected to assist without question. As the financial rewards grew, Sam acknowledged a gradual erosion of her moral compass, noting that the deeper she became in the industry, the harder it was to maintain a sense of ethics or empathy. The influence of sensational content on viewer engagement is another troubling trend. A video titled “Our First Pet Died,” featuring a thumbnail of a LaBrant child seemingly in distress, amassed 34 million views. However, the video was later revealed to be misleading, as the deceased pet was a goldfish, not a dog. Similarly, the Family Fun Pack gained attention for posting a video capturing their children’s emotional reactions during their grandmother’s funeral, which received nearly two million views. Such content raises ethical questions about the exploitation of genuine emotion for audience engagement. Other instances reveal disturbing practices. Jordan Cheyenne, an influencer, faced criticism after inadvertently posting a video in which she coached her son to display exaggerated grief upon learning his dog had died. In the clip, Cheyenne instructed her son to appear more sorrowful, emphasizing the need to focus on the camera. The incident sparked outrage, highlighting the potential for parental guidance to cross into inappropriate territory when driven by the desire for likes and views. Many children, particularly those born into this culture of constant exposure, may lack alternatives or awareness of other ways to live. While some seem willing to comply with their parents' demands, others quietly resist. The justification offered by some influencers, that their children do not complain, may mask underlying dissatisfaction. The book presents a range of stories that illustrate both the allure and the dangers of turning childhood into content, leaving readers to grapple with the long-term effects on young minds.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

The Daily Wire logoThe Daily WireIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 7521 hr. ago
The Ugly Truth Hiding Behind Picture Perfect Family Influencers

The article discusses the pressures and ethical dilemmas faced by families who become influencers by documenting their children's lives online. It uses personal anecdotes and insights from the book 'Like, Follow, Subscribe' by Fortesa Latifi to explore how some families, such as the LaBrants and a pseudonymous influencer named Sam, navigate the challenges of monetizing their children's content. The piece highlights issues such as manipulation, financial incentives, and the emotional toll on both parents and children. It also references extreme cases, including Ruby Franke's legal troubles, to illustrate the broader implications of turning parenting into a business.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue of influencer parenting through a critical lens, emphasizing the exploitation of children and the moral compromises made by some families. While it presents factual accounts, the emphasis on systemic issues within the influencer industry and the critique of capitalist动机(

Why factuality (90): The article presents a personal anecdote about a family's experience with influencer culture and references the book 'Like, Follow, Subscribe' and specific examples like Ruby Franke. It aligns with broader discussions about the pressures and ethical concerns of parenting in the digital age. While no

Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat subjective, focusing on the personal experience of the narrator and expressing concern about the influence of social media on children. There is some editorializing about the negative impacts of influencer culture, though it remains within the bounds of opinion based on reported

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories