ON
← Back to feed
The Sandpaper series was radioactive from the start. Then a USB stick was delivered to my room
Australia⚽ Sports5 hr. ago

The Sandpaper series was radioactive from the start. Then a USB stick was delivered to my room

This article recounts the tense and controversial events surrounding the 2018 Cricket World Cup and subsequent Test series between Australia and South Africa. It begins with the author describing a mysterious USB stick delivered to their hotel room in Port Elizabeth, containing leaked footage of a confrontation between Australian cricketer David Warner and South African wicketkeeper Quinton de Kock during the first Test in Durban. This footage, captured from a different angle than previously released, reignited tensions in the series. The narrative then shifts to the larger controversy involving ball-tampering allegations that led to the suspension of key players including Cameron Bancroft, David Warner, and Steve Smith. The author reflects on the chaos that followed, comparing the situation to a significant captaincy crisis in cricket history. The article highlights the broader implications of these incidents for Australian cricket, including the impact on the national team and the integrity of the game.

Sixteen days before Cameron Bancroft was found concealing a piece of sandpaper in his trousers during the third Test in Cape Town, a USB stick arrived at the writer's hotel room in Port Elizabeth, where the second Test between Australia and South Africa was set to commence. It was midday, yet no food had been ordered, and the housekeeping staff had already visited that morning. As the writer opened the door, they realized the delivery was not typical, this was a USB stick. For a sports journalist covering cricket, such an occurrence was rare. However, the recent first Test in Durban had already suggested this tour would not be ordinary. Inside the USB drive was unseen footage of an incident that had sparked controversy early in the series, a confrontation between David Warner and South Africa’s wicketkeeper Quinton de Kock in a stairwell. This video offered a new perspective compared to an earlier leak shared with South African media, generating additional headlines. At the time, the writer could not foresee how this moment would become a minor detail in one of cricket’s most notorious scandals. Australia’s tour of South Africa in 2018 was already fraught with tension before the scandal erupted at Newlands. Following the exposure of Bancroft, the writer described the Cape Town incident as the most significant captaincy crisis since Greg Chappell instructed his brother Trevor to bowl underarm. In hindsight, this assessment proved understated. The Test match at Newlands marked a turning point for Australian cricket, leading to a reckoning for both the national team and the sport itself. Reporting on the aftermath was unlike any previous assignment. On the writer’s first evening in South Africa, while drinking a Castle Lager at a hotel bar in Durban, they learned that Australia had requested the stump microphones be turned off during their fielding sessions. The implication was clear, the team did not wish for their on-field comments toward South Africa to be captured by the public, particularly given the usual high sensitivity of these microphones in South Africa. This request was disregarded by Supersport, the South African network broadcasting the series and ultimately identifying Bancroft in Cape Town. Some within the Australian camp later believed the broadcaster had become a tool against them, tracking their movements on the field with potentially damaging results. In Durban, Australia initially responded to the microphones remaining active with humor, using the situation to promote Cricket Australia’s sponsors. One player was overheard asking an umpire, “How good is Qantas?” referencing the umpire’s sponsorship deal with Emirates. However, tensions quickly escalated amid allegations of verbal exchanges between Warner and de Kock. The press corps, sharing accommodations with the Australian players, witnessed Warner appearing visibly frustrated in the breakfast room the morning after his encounter with de Kock. Warner was not merely a passive participant in these events. He reportedly took issue with de Kock’s alleged remarks about his wife, Candice, and strongly denied any involvement in personal or family-related sledging.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 655 hr. ago
The Sandpaper series was radioactive from the start. Then a USB stick was delivered to my room

Prior to the infamous sandpaper scandal involving Australian cricketer Cameron Bancroft during the 2018 Test series in South Africa, a journalist received a USB stick containing previously unseen footage of a confrontation between David Warner and South African wicketkeeper Quinton de Kock during the first Test in Durban. This incident added to the growing tensions of the series, which was already marked by controversy. The journalist reflects on how the series became increasingly volatile, culminating in the scandal at Newlands, where Bancroft was caught using sandpaper to alter the condition of the ball. The fallout led to the return home of several Australian players, including Warner, Bancroft, and captain Steve Smith, marking one of the most significant crises in Australian cricket history.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a sports event and does not present a political stance or frame the content with ideological bias. It recounts events objectively and provides background without favoring any side.

Why factuality (75): The article reports on events related to the 2018 Cricket World Cup and the subsequent ball-tampering scandal. It references the 'radioactive' nature of the series, the USB stick delivery, and the initial conflict between Warner and De Kock. These details align with widely reported accounts of the p

Why objectivity (65): The tone of the article leans toward a narrative that frames the series as inherently problematic and eventually leading to scandal. While it presents facts, the language suggests a somewhat critical view of the Australian team and the overall situation, which may introduce bias. The focus on the 'r

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 655 hr. ago
The Sandpaper series was radioactive from the start. Then a USB stick was delivered to my room

This article recounts the tense and controversial events surrounding the 2018 Cricket World Cup and subsequent Test series between Australia and South Africa. It begins with the author describing a mysterious USB stick delivered to their hotel room in Port Elizabeth, containing leaked footage of a confrontation between Australian cricketer David Warner and South African wicketkeeper Quinton de Kock during the first Test in Durban. This footage, captured from a different angle than previously released, reignited tensions in the series. The narrative then shifts to the larger controversy involving ball-tampering allegations that led to the suspension of key players including Cameron Bancroft, David Warner, and Steve Smith. The author reflects on the chaos that followed, comparing the situation to a significant captaincy crisis in cricket history. The article highlights the broader implications of these incidents for Australian cricket, including the impact on the national team and the integrity of the game.

Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a sports-related event and does not engage with politically charged topics such as government policies, elections, or social issues. The framing remains neutral, presenting the events as they occurred without overt ideological slant.

Why factuality (75): This article mirrors the content of the previous one, detailing the same events regarding the USB stick delivery, the initial conflict between Warner and De Kock, and the eventual ball-tampering scandal. The information presented is consistent with broader coverage of the 2018 series, particularly t

Why objectivity (65): Similar to the first article, this piece maintains a narrative that emphasizes the buildup to the scandal, suggesting a preordained outcome. The language used to describe the events, such as calling the series 'radioactive,' carries a tone that may be interpreted as biased towards portraying the Aus

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories