ON
← Back to feed
Tusla referred 23 deaths to review panel in 2025
Ireland🏛️ PoliticsCenter4 hr. ago

Tusla referred 23 deaths to review panel in 2025

In 2025, Tusla referred 23 deaths of children and young people known to their services to the National Review Panel (NRP), marking an increase of four compared to the previous year. These deaths did not involve children in formal care but included those known to Tusla through other services, such as aftercare or community-based support. The causes of death varied, with some attributed to natural causes, suicide, homicide, accidents, and others remaining undetermined due to ongoing investigations. The NRP, established in 2010, has reviewed 163 cases over the years. Recent reports highlighted systemic issues in child protection, including inadequate assessments, poor inter-agency communication, and delays in addressing complex needs. Specific cases like Rosa’s, involving cross-border challenges and insufficient oversight, and Barry’s, marked by delayed interventions and placement instability, underscored areas needing improvement.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

RTÉ News logoRTÉ NewsState / PublicCenter4 hr. ago
Tusla referred 23 deaths to review panel in 2025

In 2025, Tusla referred 23 deaths of children and young people known to their services to the National Review Panel (NRP), marking an increase of four compared to the previous year. These deaths did not involve children in formal care but included those known to Tusla through other services, such as aftercare or community-based support. The causes of death varied, with some attributed to natural causes, suicide, homicide, accidents, and others remaining undetermined due to ongoing investigations. The NRP, established in 2010, has reviewed 163 cases over the years. Recent reports highlighted systemic issues in child protection, including inadequate assessments, poor inter-agency communication, and delays in addressing complex needs. Specific cases like Rosa’s, involving cross-border challenges and insufficient oversight, and Barry’s, marked by delayed interventions and placement instability, underscored areas needing improvement.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data and findings from the National Review Panel without overtly favoring any political side. It includes detailed information on the nature of the deaths, the process of referrals, and critical observations from the NRP regarding systemic issues. There is no evident slm

TheJournal.ie logoTheJournal.ieIndependentCenter2 days ago
The question that revealed child in State care went missing 274 times in a year

An investigation by The Journal Investigates revealed that between January 2020 and September 2025, Tusla, Ireland's child and family agency, recorded 6,972 instances of children going missing from state-run residential care facilities. These figures include cases where a single child was reported missing 274 times in a single year. The data highlights a concerning pattern of repeated disappearances among vulnerable children in care, raising questions about the adequacy of safeguards and oversight. Tusla defines 'missing from care' as any instance where a child's location is unknown for 15 minutes or more, with safety concerns. Between 2020 and 2025, the number of annual 'missing from care' reports ranged from 1,048 to 1,523, indicating a consistent and significant issue.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual findings from an FOI request and does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It focuses on revealing systemic issues within a government agency without taking a clear ideological stance.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories