ON
← Back to feed
The Phala Phala fight: Why Malema wants Didiza out
ZA🏛️ Politics7 days ago

The Phala Phala fight: Why Malema wants Didiza out

Julius Malema, leader of South Africa's Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), has filed a motion to remove National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza over her handling of the impeachment process against President Cyril Ramaphosa. The motion argues that Didiza prioritized political interests over constitutional duties by not opposing Ramaphosa's request to halt the impeachment committee's work. Malema claims Didiza acted unconstitutionally by making a major decision before seeking legal advice and later using legal opinions to justify her actions, which he says raised concerns about impartiality and political bias. The motion also accuses Didiza of undermining the multiparty nature of Parliament by making unilateral decisions and placing party politics above constitutional obligations. Several political parties have criticized Didiza for her role in the impeachment process.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

IOL (Independent Online) logoIOL (Independent Online)Party-alignedLeft7 days ago
The Phala Phala fight: Why Malema wants Didiza out

Julius Malema, leader of South Africa's Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), has filed a motion to remove National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza over her handling of the impeachment process against President Cyril Ramaphosa. The motion argues that Didiza prioritized political interests over constitutional duties by not opposing Ramaphosa's request to halt the impeachment committee's work. Malema claims Didiza acted unconstitutionally by making a major decision before seeking legal advice and later using legal opinions to justify her actions, which he says raised concerns about impartiality and political bias. The motion also accuses Didiza of undermining the multiparty nature of Parliament by making unilateral decisions and placing party politics above constitutional obligations. Several political parties have criticized Didiza for her role in the impeachment process.

Bias read (Left): The article presents the perspective of Julius Malema and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), a leftist political party in South Africa, who accuse National Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza of acting politically rather than constitutionally. The framing emphasizes the constitutional and ethical faili8

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories