ON
← Back to feed
The land that knew no peace
Australia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives8 days ago

The land that knew no peace

The article is an opinion piece by Dr. Mujib Abid reflecting on his upbringing in Afghanistan during periods of conflict and political turmoil. He critiques various historical influences, such as the Soviet and American occupations, the Marxist-Leninist regime of the 1980s, and subsequent waves of political ideology, that he argues have distorted Afghan society and religious practices. These external forces, according to Abid, have imposed foreign ideologies onto Afghan culture, reducing complex religious traditions like Islam to simplistic labels such as 'fundamentalist' or 'moderate'. He contrasts these experiences with what he describes as 'traditional Islam', rooted in Sufism, which he associates with personal and communal resilience. This traditional faith, exemplified by figures like his grandfather and teachers, is portrayed as a counterbalance to the political and ideological conflicts that have shaped modern Afghanistan.

The land that knew no peace has become a symbol of enduring struggle and cultural resilience, according to Dr Mujib Abid, a scholar whose reflections trace the complex interplay of political turmoil and spiritual tradition in Afghanistan. Writing in The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald, Abid recalls growing up in a nation shaped by decades of conflict, from the Soviet invasion of the 1980s to the U.S.-led military presence after 2001. His account highlights how successive waves of foreign intervention, whether communist, liberal democratic, or Islamist, have imposed ideological frameworks upon Afghan society, often distorting religious practices and reducing them to political instruments. As Afghanistan prepares to mark its Independence Day, Abid argues that the country's true strength lies in its pre-modern spiritual heritage, particularly the Sufi traditions that have long flourished in rural communities. Abid describes his childhood as one marked by constant upheaval. He lived through the chaotic years of the 1990s civil war, when religious extremism took hold, and later witnessed the impact of the American-led occupation, which he compares to the earlier Soviet influence. Both periods, he writes, saw external powers attempting to reshape Afghan identity along lines that suited their geopolitical agendas. The 1980s were defined by the rise of Marxist-Leninist movements, which led to widespread violence and instability. In the following decade, the Taliban emerged as a dominant force, enforcing a strict interpretation of Islam that alienated many Afghans. The arrival of Western troops in 2001 brought new challenges, with policies and values perceived as intrusive and incompatible with local customs. These interventions, Abid suggests, have all contributed to a deepening divide between the state and the broader population, leaving many feeling disconnected from their cultural roots. Central to Abid’s argument is the idea that Afghan society has always been deeply rooted in a more organic form of spirituality, one that predates modern political movements and is grounded in centuries-old Sufi traditions. He emphasizes that these traditions, rather than being tools of resistance or submission, offer a path to inner peace and communal harmony. Sufism, he explains, is characterized by its focus on personal spiritual growth, mystical insight, and a deep connection to the divine. Unlike the rigid dogmas promoted by political factions, Sufi teachings encourage introspection, compassion, and a holistic understanding of existence. This approach, Abid contends, has allowed many Afghans to maintain a sense of continuity despite the disruptions caused by war and foreign rule. Abid draws on personal memories to illustrate this point. He recalls the devotion of his grandfather, who regularly recited Dalā’il al-Khayrāt, a revered collection of prayers and virtues. His grandmother, meanwhile, was a devoted follower of the Shah Samad Pir Yakhpush shrine, a site associated with a local Sufi saint. Even his early education in the village mosque was steeped in the poetry of Hafiz, a 14th-century Persian poet known for his lyrical exploration of love and spirituality. These experiences, he says, helped shape his view that true faith lies not in political allegiance but in a deeper, more intuitive relationship with the divine. He further notes that the Sufi tradition has remained resilient because it does not rely on institutional power or political authority. Instead, it thrives in informal settings, family gatherings, village festivals, quiet moments of reflection. This decentralized nature makes it difficult for governments or external actors to control or co-opt it. As a result, Sufism continues to serve as a unifying force among Afghans, offering a counterbalance to the divisive narratives promoted by competing political groups. Looking ahead, Abid expresses hope that future generations will continue to draw inspiration from these ancient traditions. He cites the works of poets like Farid ud-Din Attar, Rumi, and Bedil Dehlavi as examples of literary and spiritual wealth that can guide the Afghan people toward healing and renewal. For him, the journey back to a more authentic form of Islam is not merely a nostalgic exercise, it is a necessary step toward restoring dignity, stability, and meaning in a nation that has endured so much.

2 reports

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 458 days ago
The land that knew no peace

The article is an opinion piece by Dr. Mujib Abid reflecting on his upbringing in Afghanistan during periods of conflict and political turmoil. He critiques various historical influences, such as the 1990s religious extremism, the Soviet and American occupations, and the Marxist-Leninist policies of the 1980s, for distorting Afghan society and religious practices. Abid argues that these external ideologies, including socialism, radical Islam, and neoliberal capitalism, have imposed artificial frameworks on Afghan identity and religion. He contrasts these with 'traditional Islam,' particularly Sufism, which he associates with spiritual resilience and cultural continuity. He references personal family traditions and literary works like those of Hafiz, Rumi, and Farid ud-Din Attar as examples of this enduring spiritual heritage.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames historical interventions (Soviet, American, Marxist-Leninist) as destructive forces imposing foreign ideologies on Afghan society. It positions 'traditional Islam', particularly Sufism, as a counterforce to these political and ideological impositions, suggesting a preference for non

Why factuality (75): The article presents a personal perspective on Afghanistan's history, drawing comparisons between various political movements and ideological influences. While it references historical events like the Soviet invasion and U.S. occupation, it lacks specific citations or primary sources to support thes

Why objectivity (45): The tone is highly polemic and emotionally charged, using strong language to criticize Western influence and promote a particular interpretation of Islamic tradition. The author clearly advocates for 'traditional Islam' and frames opposing ideologies as corrupting forces. This one-sided framing and

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 458 days ago
The land that knew no peace

The article is an opinion piece by Dr. Mujib Abid reflecting on his upbringing in Afghanistan during periods of conflict and political turmoil. He critiques various historical influences, such as the Soviet and American occupations, the Marxist-Leninist regime of the 1980s, and subsequent waves of political ideology, that he argues have distorted Afghan society and religious practices. These external forces, according to Abid, have imposed foreign ideologies onto Afghan culture, reducing complex religious traditions like Islam to simplistic labels such as 'fundamentalist' or 'moderate'. He contrasts these experiences with what he describes as 'traditional Islam', rooted in Sufism, which he associates with personal and communal resilience. This traditional faith, exemplified by figures like his grandfather and teachers, is portrayed as a counterbalance to the political and ideological conflicts that have shaped modern Afghanistan.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the imposition of Western and Marxist ideologies on Afghanistan as inherently destructive, while celebrating traditional Sufi Islam as a positive, uncorrupted alternative. The author uses emotionally charged language to critique political interventions and emphasizes the cultural,

Why factuality (75): This article is identical in content to the previous one, suggesting it may be a duplicate or republished piece. As with the first, it lacks specific sourcing and relies on a personal narrative rather than verified historical data. The claims about ideological influences and interpretations of Islam

Why objectivity (45): Like the first article, this piece maintains a strongly biased tone, promoting a specific ideological viewpoint while dismissing alternative perspectives. The language remains emotive and unbalanced, reinforcing the same one-sided critique of Western and modern political influences. There is no atte

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories