ON
← Back to feed
Conflict in the Middle East pushes oil to US$100 per barrel as the dollar in Chile touches year highs
World🏛️ PoliticsCenter3 days ago

Conflict in the Middle East pushes oil to US$100 per barrel as the dollar in Chile touches year highs

The escalation of conflict in Iran, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and threats to oil transit through the Red Sea have reignited market fears, pushing global crude oil prices and the dollar to new highs. This has raised inflation expectations. On Thursday, oil benchmarks reached two-month highs due to reports of attacks on Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea and President Donald Trump’s warning of a 'massive attack' against Iran, threatening the fragile ceasefire agreement signed in mid-June. The Brent crude, which serves as a reference for Chile, rose 6.52% to $100.62, reaching a high of $101.91 during the day, its highest level since May 22. Meanwhile, the U.S. benchmark WTI surged 5.45% to $91.56. Houthi rebels in Yemen, allies of Iran, claimed they attacked two Saudi oil tankers in retaliation for what they see as a violation of the maritime blockade declared this week against Riyadh. Trump warned the U.S. would hold Iran responsible for any future Houthi aggression against ships in the Red Sea and threatened to impose a 'greater military punishment' on Tehran and Yemeni militias. Against this backdrop, Goldman Sachs estimated that Brent crude could exceed $120 per barrel by

Across Asia, the escalating conflict between Iran and the United States is sending shockwaves through economies and daily life, with staple foods becoming significantly more expensive. In countries that depend heavily on energy imports from the Middle East, the ripple effects of the renewed warfare are being felt in rising inflation, disrupted tourism, and soaring ingredient costs. From street food stalls in Thailand to noodle shops in South Korea and snack vendors in India, businesses are struggling under the weight of higher expenses, while consumers face shrinking purchasing power. The conflict, which reignited after the collapse of a preliminary U.S.-Iran ceasefire, has led to a sharp increase in global oil prices, with the benchmark Brent crude surpassing $100 per barrel. This surge has triggered fears among economists and market analysts, who warn that prolonged disruptions in key shipping lanes could push prices even higher. The Strait of Hormuz, through which 20 percent of the world's oil passes, has become a flashpoint due to heightened military activity. Meanwhile, tensions in the Red Sea, where Houthi rebels have targeted vessels, add another layer of uncertainty to global energy markets. In South Korea, traditional dishes that were once considered affordable are now facing steep price hikes. Kim Moon-jung, a 59-year-old street food vendor in Seoul, sells kalguksu, hand-cut noodles in savory broth, for about 9,000 won (approximately €5). However, with the cost of ingredients like flour, clams, and vegetables rising steadily, she plans to increase the price to at least 10,000 won in the near future. This move follows reports from South Korea’s consumer agency indicating that the average bowl of kalguksu in Seoul has already crossed that threshold, marking a psychological shift for residents accustomed to finding affordable meals. To cope, some locals have turned to a crowdsourced map identifying restaurants offering meals priced at 10,000 won or less. In India, small business owners are grappling with similar challenges. Shubham Yadav, who runs a dairy shop in Lucknow, noted that the price of gas cylinders used for cooking has nearly doubled to 3,600 rupees (about €33). As India relies on imported liquefied petroleum gas, much of which travels through the Strait of Hormuz, the ongoing conflict threatens the stability of this vital supply chain. Despite the rising costs, Yadav has only managed to increase the price of his samosas, a popular street food, by a mere cent. He worries that further price hikes may be necessary, but he hopes customers will continue to support him despite the financial strain. In Thailand, street food vendor Supatra Ruamthot has noticed a marked decline in business since the war began. Once busy with orders arriving before she even set up her stall, she now finds herself waiting for customers. Her costs have risen by approximately 30 percent, yet she has chosen not to raise prices, fearing a loss of clientele. With profits dwindling to just over 1,000 baht (around €26) per day, she questions how long she can maintain her business. Conversations with fellow vendors reveal similar struggles, highlighting the widespread impact of the crisis on small-scale food entrepreneurs. The economic repercussions of the Iran conflict extend beyond individual businesses, affecting entire regions reliant on stable energy supplies. Analysts predict that continued disruptions in shipping routes could lead to further spikes in oil prices, potentially reaching $120 per barrel if the situation persists into the fourth quarter of the year. These developments place additional pressure on governments and central banks, which must balance the need to stabilize markets against the growing demands of their populations. As the conflict continues to unfold, the interconnected nature of global trade means that the consequences will likely be felt far beyond the immediate region. Countries dependent on imported fuels and raw materials are particularly vulnerable, with the potential for broader economic instability. For now, however, the focus remains on managing the immediate impacts, as businesses and consumers navigate the uncertain terrain shaped by the ongoing war.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

La Tercera logoLa TerceraIndependent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 858 days ago
Conflict in the Middle East pushes oil to US$100 per barrel as the dollar in Chile touches year highs

The escalation of conflict in Iran, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and threats to oil transit through the Red Sea have reignited market fears, pushing global crude oil prices and the dollar to new highs. This has raised inflation expectations. On Thursday, oil benchmarks reached two-month highs due to reports of attacks on Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea and President Donald Trump’s warning of a 'massive attack' against Iran, threatening the fragile ceasefire agreement signed in mid-June. The Brent crude, which serves as a reference for Chile, rose 6.52% to $100.62, reaching a high of $101.91 during the day, its highest level since May 22. Meanwhile, the U.S. benchmark WTI surged 5.45% to $91.56. Houthi rebels in Yemen, allies of Iran, claimed they attacked two Saudi oil tankers in retaliation for what they see as a violation of the maritime blockade declared this week against Riyadh. Trump warned the U.S. would hold Iran responsible for any future Houthi aggression against ships in the Red Sea and threatened to impose a 'greater military punishment' on Tehran and Yemeni militias. Against this backdrop, Goldman Sachs estimated that Brent crude could exceed $120 per barrel by

Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of geopolitical tensions affecting global oil prices and currency values, citing multiple international actors and economic analyses without overtly favoring any side.

Why factuality (90): The article provides precise data on oil price increases, referencing specific dates and percentages. It includes quotes from officials and explains the broader economic implications, aligning with other reports. The information is consistent with the cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the facts about the conflict and its economic effects without taking a clear ideological stance. It focuses on the data and expert analysis, avoiding excessive emotional language.

The Irish Times logoThe Irish TimesIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 823 days ago
The Iran war is making noodles costlier 7,000km away

Across Asia, the economic impact of the ongoing Iran war is being felt through rising prices of everyday goods, particularly affecting staple foods like noodles, samosas, and other street foods. Countries reliant on Middle Eastern energy imports have experienced significant inflation, driven by disrupted supply chains and increased energy costs. In South Korea, street food vendor Kim Moon-jung faces pressure to raise the price of her traditional kalguksu noodles due to soaring ingredient costs, despite concerns over customer affordability. In India, samosa seller Shubham Yadav struggles with rising gas prices, which have nearly doubled, impacting his ability to maintain profit margins. These effects highlight the global ripple of regional conflicts on economies and daily life.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the economic impacts of the Iran war on Asian countries without overt ideological framing. It includes quotes from multiple stakeholders and provides context on both the geopolitical conflict and its economic consequences, offering a balanced view of the situation without favor.

Why factuality (85): The article provides specific examples of how the Iran war is affecting food prices in various Asian countries, citing specific individuals like Supatra Ruamthot and Kim Moon-jung. It references concrete details such as price changes in South Korea and mentions the impact on tourism and inflation. H

Why objectivity (82): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting quotes from affected individuals and describing the situation without overtly favoring any perspective. However, phrases like 'we are all in the same boat, hoping it won’t sink' introduce some emotional language, slightly reducing the overa

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 707 days ago
Oil at $120, inflation and high rates plus time: this is how the escalation of the war in Iran will affect you

The article discusses the rising tensions between the United States and Iran, which have led to increased concerns over global oil prices and economic impacts. The Brent crude oil price has crossed the psychological threshold of $100 per barrel due to fears of renewed conflict, including potential attacks on Iranian infrastructure and heightened military activity in strategic areas like the Strait of Hormuz and the Bab el-Mandeb. These developments threaten global oil flows, potentially increasing fuel costs in Europe and disrupting maritime trade routes such as the Suez Canal. Experts warn of geopolitical risk premiums rising amid limited global oil reserves and constrained production flexibility. Goldman Sachs predicts the Brent could reach $120 per barrel if disruptions continue into the fourth quarter. Meanwhile, the U.S. government faces financial strain from ongoing military operations, requesting additional funding ahead of midterm elections.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of the geopolitical situation, discussing both the potential risks and economic implications without overtly favoring any side. It cites expert opinions and market predictions while presenting the perspectives of multiple actors involved, including the U.S.,

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed analysis of geopolitical tensions involving Iran, the Strait of Hormuz, and Bab el-Mandeb, citing the impact on oil prices and global trade routes. These points align with general knowledge of Middle Eastern geopolitics and energy markets. However, some statements like

Why objectivity (70): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'cóctel explosivo', 'interferencia belicista', and 'dialéctica belicista', suggesting a biased perspective toward the conflict. It frames the situation as an imminent threat without presenting counterarguments or alternative viewpoints, leading t

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories