ON
← Back to feed
The family feud over the $65 billion Ray-Ban fortune
Australia🏛️ PoliticsCenter8/31/2026

The family feud over the $65 billion Ray-Ban fortune

The family dispute over the $65 billion Ray-Ban fortune has intensified following the departure of Leonardo Maria Del Vecchio, the fourth son of the late founder Leonardo Del Vecchio, from his management roles at the eyewear company Delfin Sarl. This move comes amid a four-year feud among the eight heirs of the Del Vecchio family over the control and future direction of Delfin, which holds significant stakes in major Italian financial institutions like Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena and Assicurazioni Generali. The ongoing conflict has created uncertainty within EssilorLuxottica, the parent company of Ray-Ban, which is currently competing in the emerging market for AI-powered smart glasses. The company has seen its stock price drop by around 40% this year, prompting it to announce a share buyback program worth over €800 million to stabilize its value.

The family feud over the $65 billion Ray-Ban fortune escalated further as one of the late Leonardo Del Vecchio's heirs stepped down from key management roles at the eyewear company he founded. Leonardo Maria Del Vecchio, the 31-year-old fourth son of the late industrialist, announced his abrupt exit from positions at EssilorLuxottica SA, the parent company of Ray-Ban, Oakley, and Oliver Peoples. His decision, made public last week, marks another blow to the long-standing family dispute over control of Delfin Sarl, the dominant shareholder in the Italian-based company. The conflict, now in its fourth year, continues to disrupt the operations of a major player in the global eyewear industry. Leonardo Maria had attempted, without success, to resolve the deadlock within the family firm. With eight heirs and numerous advisors involved, the governance of Delfin Sarl has become a complex and contentious issue. The company holds significant stakes in several major Italian institutions, including Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, one of Italy’s largest lenders, and Assicurazioni Generali SpA, a leading European insurer. It also maintains an investment in Unicredit SpA, adding to the broader implications of the family’s internal struggles. For EssilorLuxottica, the ongoing family disputes have created operational challenges. The company is striving to maintain its leadership in the emerging market for artificial-intelligence-powered smart glasses, developed in collaboration with Meta. However, growing competition from tech giants such as Apple, Google, and Samsung threatens its position. Analysts have noted that the internal strife within Delfin has affected investor confidence, contributing to a steep decline in EssilorLuxottica’s stock price. This year alone, the company’s shares have dropped by approximately 40 percent, reducing its market value to around €75 billion ($121 billion). According to Bloomberg data, EssilorLuxottica accounts for roughly 60 percent of Delfin’s total assets. In response to the share price slump and the recent departure of Leonardo Maria, the company announced plans to repurchase up to 5 million shares, worth more than €800 million at current valuations. While these measures aim to stabilize the company’s financial standing, they come amid continued uncertainty surrounding the future direction of the business. Leonardo Maria’s exit also signals a shift in his relationship with Francesco Milleri, the longtime CEO of both EssilorLuxottica and Delfin. Once a staunch supporter of Milleri, Leonardo Maria used his resignation letter to criticize the evolving corporate culture. He described a workplace where success was celebrated but discomfort was met with indifference. “The sense of belonging isn’t what it used to be,” he wrote. “The distance is felt.” These remarks reflect a deeper disillusionment with the leadership style that once aligned him with the company’s vision. Although Leonardo Maria’s departure may not immediately affect day-to-day operations, given his primary role in marketing initiatives such as the hiring of rapper A$AP Rocky as a creative director for Ray-Ban, the move underscores growing tensions within the organization. Industry insiders suggest that the company is unlikely to replace his roles promptly, leaving a void in strategic oversight. This lack of continuity raises concerns about how effectively EssilorLuxottica can navigate the competitive landscape while managing the fallout from the family feud. As the situation unfolds, the broader implications extend beyond the eyewear sector. The unresolved governance issues at Delfin continue to influence Italy’s financial sector, particularly given its substantial holdings in key institutions. The outcome of this prolonged family battle will likely shape not only the future of EssilorLuxottica but also the stability of some of Italy’s most prominent financial entities.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 808/31/2026
The family feud over the $65 billion Ray-Ban fortune

The article discusses the ongoing family feud within the Del Vecchio family over the control of the €40 billion fortune of the late Leonardo Del Vecchio. The conflict has intensified after Leonardo Maria Del Vecchio, the 31-year-old fourth son, resigned from his roles at the eyewear company Delfin Sarl and EssilorLuxottica SA, which owns brands like Ray-Ban. This move comes amid a four-year governance crisis involving eight heirs and their advisors, affecting the company's ability to maintain its competitive edge in the AI smart glasses market. The situation has impacted EssilorLuxottica's stock performance, leading to a 40% decline this year. In response, the company announced plans to repurchase up to 5 million shares worth over €800 million.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the family dispute without overtly favoring any particular side. It reports on the implications of the family feud on business operations and stock performance without taking a clear ideological stance. The narrative remains focused on the factual outcomes,

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the details of the family feud over Leonardo Del Vecchio's fortune, including the exit of Leonardo Maria Del Vecchio from management roles and the impact on EssilorLuxottica. It references the financial stakes and the broader implications for Italy's financial sector,

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting the situation without overt bias. However, there is a slight emphasis on the negative consequences of the family feud, which may lean slightly towards a critical perspective.

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 808/31/2026
The family feud over the $65 billion Ray-Ban fortune

The family dispute over the $65 billion Ray-Ban fortune has intensified following the departure of Leonardo Maria Del Vecchio, the fourth son of the late founder Leonardo Del Vecchio, from his management roles at the eyewear company Delfin Sarl. This move comes amid a four-year feud among the eight heirs of the Del Vecchio family over the control and future direction of Delfin, which holds significant stakes in major Italian financial institutions like Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena and Assicurazioni Generali. The ongoing conflict has created uncertainty within EssilorLuxottica, the parent company of Ray-Ban, which is currently competing in the emerging market for AI-powered smart glasses. The company has seen its stock price drop by around 40% this year, prompting it to announce a share buyback program worth over €800 million to stabilize its value.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of the situation, detailing the family dispute and its implications for the company and broader financial sector without overtly favoring any side. It includes quotes from a financial analyst and outlines the economic impacts without apparent ideological bias

Why factuality (85): This article mirrors the content of the previous one, providing consistent information about the family feud, the role of Delfin Sarl, and the implications for EssilorLuxottica and Italy's financial sector. It maintains alignment with the cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (80): Similar to the first article, the tone is largely neutral, though it subtly highlights the challenges faced by EssilorLuxottica due to the family conflict, which may imply a minor editorial leaning.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories