ON
← Back to feed
The battle for Israel: As Netanyahu rallies the Right, Eisenkot makes his move for power
IL🏛️ PoliticsCenter

The battle for Israel: As Netanyahu rallies the Right, Eisenkot makes his move for power

As Israel approaches its upcoming general election, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is actively working to consolidate support among right-wing voters, targeting potential rivals within his own ideological bloc. Meanwhile, former chief of staff Gadi Eisenkot is positioning himself as a strong alternative leader for the opposition, seeking to unify the anti-Netanyahu factions under his leadership. The article describes the fragmented nature of both the pro-Netanyahu and anti-Netanyahu camps, highlighting the internal competition within each group. Netanyahu has increased his media presence, appearing on multiple Israeli television channels and radio stations to emphasize the stakes of the election and warn against splitting the right-wing vote. Eisenkot, through his party Yashar, aims to strengthen his position as the leading opposition figure.

A majority of Israelis prefer a unity government over additional voting if the October 27 election fails to yield a decisive outcome, according to a new survey. The poll, conducted by Lazar Research in cooperation with Panel4ALL for the Maariv newspaper, indicates that only 27 percent of respondents favored another election, while 18 percent remained undecided. The study revealed distinct preferences between political camps. Fifty-four percent of opposition voters supported a unity cabinet solely if it were led by a leader from their own bloc. Coalition supporters displayed more division, with nearly 40 percent preferring a unity government headed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whereas 32 percent opted for further elections in the event of a deadlock. Gadi Eisenkot, leader of the Yashar party, currently holds a lead over Netanyahu in head-to-head comparisons. Forty-eight percent of respondents viewed Eisenkot as a superior prime ministerial candidate compared to Netanyahu’s 41 percent. In matchups against Naftali Bennett of B’Yachad, the two men were tied at 43 percent each. When pitted against Avigdor Liberman of Yisrael Beytenu, Netanyahu maintained a lead with 43 percent support against Liberman’s 37 percent. Optimism regarding election results varied significantly by bloc. Seventy-nine percent of Israelis expressed confidence that their preferred bloc would win, while 21 percent held pessimistic views. Among coalition voters, 90 percent were optimistic about victory, a higher rate than the 75 percent optimism recorded among opposition voters. Seat projections show a tight race entering the final days before polling. Arab parties gained one seat each this week, reaching a combined total of 14. Likud dropped two seats to 18. Despite this decline, the broader coalition bloc lost only one seat, settling at 51, aided by United Torah Judaism gaining one seat to reach eight and the People of Israel crossing the electoral threshold with four seats. Conversely, the opposition bloc also fell by one seat to 51 after Yisrael Beytenu lost one seat, dropping to eight. This leaves the two main blocs tied. The Reservists-Economic Party also crossed the threshold with four seats but is not assigned to either major bloc. Adding this party to either side would still fail to secure the 61 seats required for a parliamentary majority. Yashar leads all parties with 21 projected seats. B’Yachad follows with 13. Yair Golan’s Democrats project nine seats. Yisrael Beytenu, Otzma Yehudit, the Joint List, and United Torah Judaism all project eight seats. Shas projects seven, while the Religious Zionist Party and Ra’am project six each. The People of Israel and the Reservists-Economic Party project four seats apiece. Blue and White, the Haredi Public, Noam for Israel, and Tzomet Beit Yisrael failed to meet the electoral threshold, polling between 0.2 percent and 1.1 percent. Undecided voters account for 5.2 percent of the sample. The survey interviewed 700 respondents aged 18 and older, representing Jewish and Arab populations, during October 14 and 15. Campaign strategies have intensified as the election approaches. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has increased his presence on domestic media channels, appearing on Channel 11, Channel 14, and Army Radio within a single week. His messaging emphasizes that the race is closely contested and warns right-wing voters against splitting their votes. Netanyahu has specifically targeted Ofer Winter’s People of Israel party, stating he attempted to persuade Winter to join Likud or ally with another small right-wing group. These efforts aim to prevent right-leaning voters from supporting centrist or left-leaning options. Meanwhile, Gadi Eisenkot focuses on consolidating the opposition base. He seeks to expand his party’s support at the expense of other anti-Netanyahu factions such as B’Yachad, the Democrats, and Yisrael Beytenu. Accusations exchanged between the camps remain sharp. Pro-Netanyahu voices argue that the opposition is responsible for historical disasters and is steering the nation toward catastrophe. Opponents counter that the current leadership intends to form alliances with Arab parties to establish a Palestinian state. The political landscape features a fragmented field where small parties hold pivotal leverage. The People of Israel and the Reservists-Economic Party occupy a central position in the political spectrum, making them key targets for courtship by both major blocs. The Arab parties operate independently of these main coalitions. The coming days will determine whether these tactical maneuvers shift enough voter intent to break the current tie between the coalition and opposition blocs.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

3 reports

The Jerusalem Post logoThe Jerusalem PostIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 85
Majority of Israelis favor unity government if October 27 election ends without clear winner - poll

A recent poll conducted by Maariv indicates that a majority of Israelis prefer a unity government if the upcoming October 27 election results in no clear winner. Additionally, the survey found that 48% of respondents believe Gadi Eisenkot would be a more suitable prime minister compared to current Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who received 41% support.

Bias read (Center): The article presents polling data without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports percentages for both Netanyahu and Eisenkot without emphasizing one over the other, maintaining neutrality in its presentation of the findings.

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reflects the poll findings regarding public preference for a unity government and the relative support for Gadi Eisenkot versus Netanyahu. The percentages cited are consistent with the broader consensus from other sources. The article also includes relevant contextual details

Why objectivity (85): The article remains neutral in tone, presenting the poll results and public sentiment without overtly favoring any political bloc. It uses straightforward language and avoids subjective interpretations of the data.

The Jerusalem Post logoThe Jerusalem PostIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 80
The battle for Israel: As Netanyahu rallies the Right, Eisenkot makes his move for power

As Israel approaches its upcoming general election, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is actively working to consolidate support among right-wing voters, targeting potential rivals within his own ideological bloc. Meanwhile, former chief of staff Gadi Eisenkot is positioning himself as a strong alternative leader for the opposition, seeking to unify the anti-Netanyahu factions under his leadership. The article describes the fragmented nature of both the pro-Netanyahu and anti-Netanyahu camps, highlighting the internal competition within each group. Netanyahu has increased his media presence, appearing on multiple Israeli television channels and radio stations to emphasize the stakes of the election and warn against splitting the right-wing vote. Eisenkot, through his party Yashar, aims to strengthen his position as the leading opposition figure.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of the political dynamics between Netanyahu and Eisenkot without overtly favoring either side. It presents both figures' strategies and positions neutrally, using descriptive language rather than evaluative or biased commentary. There is no clear emphasis on褒

Why factuality (75): The article provides a narrative about political dynamics in Israel prior to an election, mentioning Netanyahu, Eisenkot, and various parties. While it does not present specific factual claims that can be verified independently, it aligns with the general consensus found in other articles about the

Why objectivity (80): The article uses a metaphor ('cruise liner') to describe the political situation, which is creative but not biased. It presents opposing viewpoints without overtly favoring one side, maintaining a relatively neutral tone. The language remains descriptive and avoids strong emotional or ideological bi

Haaretz logoHaaretzIndependent🔒CenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 80
In Eilat, Gadi Eisenkot has the hometown advantage. Can he shake Netanyahu?

The article discusses Gadi Eisenkot, a prominent Israeli military figure, who is running for office in Eilat, leveraging his local connections and reputation. The piece explores whether Eisenkot can challenge Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's influence in the region. It highlights the political dynamics in Eilat, where Eisenkot's background and ties to the area could give him an edge. The article suggests that Eisenkot's campaign might pose a significant threat to Netanyahu's dominance in the area.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view by discussing both Eisenkot's potential advantages and the challenges he faces in challenging Netanyahu. There is no overtly biased language or one-sided sourcing, suggesting a neutral stance.

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (80): The article is generally neutral but contains a slightly promotional tone when discussing Eisenkot's hometown advantage. It frames the situation as a potential challenge to Netanyahu without explicitly taking a position, maintaining a mostly objective approach.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories