ON
← Back to feed
That's just wishful thinking, Gachagua mocks Ruto's 'must-win' 2027 claim
KE🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive9 days ago

That's just wishful thinking, Gachagua mocks Ruto's 'must-win' 2027 claim

Kenya's Democracy for Citizens Party (DCP) leader Rigathi Gachagua criticized President William Ruto's assertion that his coalition 'must win' the 2027 general election, dismissing it as 'wishful thinking.' Gachagua made the comments during a public event in Nakuru, shortly after his convoy was reportedly attacked in Kaptembwa. DCP claims the attack involved armed individuals but provided no detailed evidence. Gachagua linked Ruto's confidence to past failures, such as the loss of the Ol Kalou by-election despite predictions of an 80% win. He accused Ruto of dishonesty and alleged that security agencies are responsible for attacks against DCP since his impeachment in October 2024, including incidents in Gilgil and JKIA.

Rigathi Gachagua, leader of the Democracy for Citizens Party (DCP), has publicly mocked President William Ruto’s assertion that his coalition “must win” the 2027 general election, dismissing the claim as “wishful thinking.” The remark came during a political rally in Nakuru County, where Gachagua addressed supporters while touring areas such as Free Area and Kanu House in Nakuru Town East. His comments followed reports that his motorcade had been attacked in Kaptembwa, Nakuru Town West, an incident DCP described as an attempted assassination. While the party released video footage of the alleged attack, it did not provide specific details about how the incident unfolded. During the rally, Gachagua condemned the violence, stating that political aggression would not reverse the declining support of his party’s opponents. He called the actions of those responsible “shameful,” accusing them of organizing “goons” to disrupt peaceful gatherings. Turning to Ruto’s recent claims, Gachagua pointed to the president’s insistence at a Naivasha retreat that his UDA-ODM coalition must secure victory in 2027. He argued that this assertion lacked credibility, given the outcome of the Ol Kalou by-election, which saw the UDA candidate lose the Nyandarua constituency by a margin similar to that of DCP’s Sammy Waweru Ngotho in July. “Whenever William Ruto says it is a must, that is just wishful thinking,” Gachagua stated. He added that Ruto’s allies had forecasted an 80 percent win in Ol Kalou, yet the UDA candidate lost the seat. “He must persuade the people of Kenya that they can trust him, that they can believe him. But he has lied to the people of Kenya. Nobody trusts him anymore.” This is not the first time Gachagua has criticized Ruto. Since his impeachment in October 2024, DCP has attributed several incidents of violence to state-backed actors, including a stoning incident against his campaign truck in Gilgil earlier this year and clashes at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA) in August 2025. Gachagua has consistently accused security agencies of orchestrating these attacks, a claim the government has categorically denied. The Kaptembwa incident marks another escalation in tensions between Ruto’s administration and Gachagua’s party. The attack occurred shortly after DCP released its video evidence, which depicted the moment Gachagua allegedly escaped a gunshot. While the footage appears to show a confrontation, the exact nature of the incident remains unclear. DCP has not disclosed whether law enforcement has investigated the event or taken action against those responsible. Meanwhile, the Senate has raised legal concerns over the handling of Gachagua’s impeachment case, challenging the validity of a Sh50 million compensation award issued to the former vice-president. The Senate’s intervention highlights ongoing disputes over the legality of procedures used during the impeachment process, which began in October 2024. These legal battles underscore the broader political polarization in Kenya, with key figures from opposing factions engaging in increasingly public confrontations. As the 2027 elections draw closer, the rhetoric between Ruto and Gachagua continues to intensify. With both sides accusing each other of dishonesty and manipulation, the political landscape grows more volatile. The coming months will likely see further escalations, as each party seeks to consolidate support ahead of the anticipated contest. For now, the focus remains on the unfolding conflict, with Gachagua’s dismissal of Ruto’s claims serving as a clear signal of deepening divisions.

2 reports

The Standard logoThe StandardParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 75Objective 709 days ago
That's just wishful thinking, Gachagua mocks Ruto's 'must-win' 2027 claim

Kenya's Democracy for Citizens Party (DCP) leader Rigathi Gachagua criticized President William Ruto's assertion that his coalition 'must win' the 2027 general election, dismissing it as 'wishful thinking.' Gachagua made the comments during a public event in Nakuru, shortly after his convoy was reportedly attacked in Kaptembwa. DCP claims the attack involved armed individuals but provided no detailed evidence. Gachagua linked Ruto's confidence to past failures, such as the loss of the Ol Kalou by-election despite predictions of an 80% win. He accused Ruto of dishonesty and alleged that security agencies are responsible for attacks against DCP since his impeachment in October 2024, including incidents in Gilgil and JKIA.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Ruto's claims as dishonest and politically motivated, using strong language like 'lying to the people of Kenya' and 'shameful to organize goons.' It emphasizes Gachagua's criticism of Ruto's credibility while highlighting the political tensions between the two leaders. The focuson

Why factuality (75): The headline suggests a focus on Uhuru Kenyatta's influence over Ruto's 2027 election prospects, but the article provides limited specific details about the nature of Uhuru's involvement. While it mentions the ongoing tension between Ruto and Uhuru, it lacks concrete examples or direct quotes to sub

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the situation as a continuation of existing tensions between Ruto and Uhuru, maintaining a somewhat neutral stance. However, the title implies a stronger narrative about Uhuru's looming influence, which may introduce a subtle bias toward emphasizing the historical rivalry.

Daily Nation logoDaily NationIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 709 days ago
Senate challenges rights violation, Sh50m award in Gachagua impeachment case

The Kenyan Senate has challenged a ruling that awarded Sh50 million to former Deputy President William Ruto over alleged rights violations during his impeachment proceedings against former Vice President Paul Gachagua. The challenge comes after a court ruled that the impeachment process violated Ruto's constitutional rights. The Senate argues that the ruling undermines the legislative body's authority and could set a dangerous precedent for future impeachment cases. This legal battle highlights ongoing tensions between Kenya's judiciary and legislature regarding the limits of parliamentary power.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal dispute between the Senate and the court in a balanced manner, highlighting both sides' arguments without overtly favoring one over the other. It does not use emotionally charged language or selectively omit context, maintaining neutrality in its reporting.

Why factuality (65): The article reports on the Senate challenging a rights violation and mentions a Sh50m award in the Gachagua impeachment case. While there is no primary source document to verify specifics, the information aligns with cross-source consensus that the impeachment process involved allegations of rights

Why objectivity (70): The tone remains relatively neutral, presenting the Senate's challenge as a formal action without overtly taking sides. The language is factual but slightly leans toward emphasizing the significance of the award, which may suggest a subtle editorial preference for the Senate's position.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories