ON
← Back to feed
Texas Prisoners Are Baking to Death. The State Keeps Saying No to AC.
United States🏛️ PoliticsProgressive12 hr. ago

Texas Prisoners Are Baking to Death. The State Keeps Saying No to AC.

In Texas prisons, inmates are facing life-threatening heat conditions due to the lack of air conditioning, despite legal challenges highlighting the danger. Bernhardt Tiede, a prisoner with pre-existing health conditions including diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, suffered a stroke in a cell where temperatures exceeded 110 degrees Fahrenheit. His case became central to a federal lawsuit against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), which uses a 'heat-sensitivity score' to determine who receives cooler cells. This scoring system, however, has been criticized as arbitrary and ineffective, failing to account for many vulnerable individuals. Federal Judge Robert Pitman described the system as inadequate, noting that only around 10% of prisoners are identified as needing special attention. Despite a two-week trial ending in April 2026, the judge has yet to issue a ruling, leaving the issue unresolved as Texas faces another wave of extreme heat.

Texas prisoners are enduring life-threatening heat conditions in their cells, with some suffering strokes and other severe health issues. The state continues to deny requests for air conditioning, despite growing concerns from both legal advocates and medical professionals. At the heart of this crisis is the Huntsville Unit, where temperatures routinely exceed 110 degrees Fahrenheit. Inmates have resorted to splashing themselves with toilet water to cope with the unbearable heat. The situation escalated dramatically in the summer of 2023 when Bernhardt Tiede, a prisoner with diabetes and hypertension, suffered a stroke in his cell. His case became central to a federal lawsuit challenging the lack of air conditioning in Texas prisons. Over the past two years, the state has been embroiled in legal battles over this issue, with Tiede's case serving as a focal point. Recently, just before the trial, officials claimed they had updated policies to prioritize elderly inmates for cooler accommodations. This led to Tiede being removed from the case, as he was deemed too young for the new criteria. The Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) uses a "heat-sensitivity score" to determine which inmates should be placed in air-conditioned cells. This score is calculated using a complex algorithm that considers medical conditions and medications. However, critics argue that the system is flawed and fails to adequately protect those most at risk. According to a federal judge, the system is "arbitrary, inadequate, and ineffective." The judge noted that even individuals with known health risks, such as a 90-year-old with hypertension, might not qualify for a score. In 2018, a landmark ruling in Cole v. Collier mandated that the TDCJ provide cooled housing for individuals with specific health conditions. Instead of implementing this order comprehensively, the department created a scoring system that effectively limits access to air-conditioned cells. This approach results in only about 10% of incarcerated individuals receiving scores, despite the vast majority facing significant health risks during extreme heat. The consequences of this policy are dire. Autopsies obtained by the Texas Newsroom reveal that several prisoners who were part of the litigation died under questionable circumstances. These findings underscore the severity of the situation and raise urgent questions about the adequacy of the state's response. The lack of proper cooling systems has led to a dangerous environment where inmates are left vulnerable to heat-related illnesses. As the state faces yet another heatwave, the ongoing legal battle continues. The trial concluded on April 9, but a decision has not been issued. Meanwhile, the TDCJ maintains its stance, insisting that its current measures are sufficient. Advocacy groups and legal experts continue to push for systemic changes, emphasizing the need for immediate action to address the health risks faced by prisoners. With the potential for further casualties, the situation remains a critical concern for public safety and human rights.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (4)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Slate logoSlateIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 6012 hr. ago
Texas Prisoners Are Baking to Death. The State Keeps Saying No to AC.

In Texas prisons, inmates are facing life-threatening heat conditions due to the lack of air conditioning, despite legal challenges highlighting the danger. Bernhardt Tiede, a prisoner with pre-existing health conditions including diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, suffered a stroke in a cell where temperatures exceeded 110 degrees Fahrenheit. His case became central to a federal lawsuit against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), which uses a 'heat-sensitivity score' to determine who receives cooler cells. This scoring system, however, has been criticized as arbitrary and ineffective, failing to account for many vulnerable individuals. Federal Judge Robert Pitman described the system as inadequate, noting that only around 10% of prisoners are identified as needing special attention. Despite a two-week trial ending in April 2026, the judge has yet to issue a ruling, leaving the issue unresolved as Texas faces another wave of extreme heat.

Bias read (Progressive): The article critically examines the Texas Department of Criminal Justice's handling of heat-related risks in prisons, highlighting systemic failures and the disproportionate impact on vulnerable individuals. It frames the issue as a failure of governance and calls out the inadequacy of the state's '

Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the Texas Department of Criminal Justice's heat protocols as outlined in the primary source document. It highlights specific issues such as the heat-sensitivity score system and the lack of prioritization for individuals with medical conditions like diabetes and hype

Why objectivity (60): The article presents a critical perspective on the effectiveness of the heat protocols, focusing on the shortcomings and potential risks faced by vulnerable inmates. While it provides factual information, the tone is somewhat biased towards highlighting the negative aspects, which affects its object

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories