SemanaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 958/23/2026A new seismic event was recorded on Sunday, August 23, in the department of Cundinamarca, Colombia. According to the Colombian Geological Service (SGC), the earthquake had its epicenter in the municipality of Cucunubá and measured a magnitude of 3.3. The event occurred at 9:04 a.m. with a depth of 151 kilometers. Although it was a low-magnitude event, the SGC noted that such movements are part of the ongoing seismic activity monitored across the country. The area of Cucunubá has reported other seismic events in recent months. No reports of material damage, affected people, or emergencies were known at this time. Authorities continue monitoring the situation and urge citizens to report any felt tremors in their areas. This follows a week after a strong earthquake shook the country, with the SGC providing information on aftershocks. The SGC maintains its National Seismic Network to collect real-time data on Earth movements and provide official details on each event. Colombia is highly active seismically due to its geological location where multiple tectonic plates converge. Risk management organizations recommend families prepare emergency plans, identify safe zones within homes, and
Bias read (Center): The article provides factual information about a seismic event without taking a political stance. It focuses on scientific reporting by the Colombian Geological Service (SGC) and risk management recommendations, which are non-partisan. There is no evidence of biased framing, one-sided sourcing, or o
Why factuality (95): The article provides specific details such as the date (August 23), location (Cucunubá, Cundinamarca), magnitude (3.3), time (9:04 a.m.), depth (151 km), and mentions no damage or injuries. These details align with typical reporting from the SGC and are consistent with the general consensus across s
Why objectivity (95): The article presents the information neutrally, using standard journalistic language. It avoids emotional or biased language and frames the event as part of normal seismic activity without taking sides or suggesting alarm.
SemanaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 658/17/2026 The lagmiracle between a collapsed roof and the rubble: an image of the Virgin remained intact after the Quibdó earthquakeOn August 10th, a seismic event affected multiple regions in Colombia, including the urban center of Quibdó, the capital of the Chocó department. One notable incident involved a 70-year-old clothing store that partially collapsed, yet a statue of the Virgin Mary remained undamaged despite surrounding structural damage. The store had been a local landmark and employment hub, and its owners confirmed the collapse occurred while they were not inside. Despite significant destruction, the religious figure was preserved, prompting the owners to keep it in place during cleanup efforts. Authorities continue assessing the broader impacts of the earthquake, while the store’s owners focus on rebuilding and resuming operations.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a natural disaster and its localized impact, emphasizing the physical condition of a religious artifact rather than taking a political stance. While religion is mentioned, the narrative remains neutral, focusing on the event itself and the community's response without overtly褒
Why factuality (95): The article provides specific details such as the date of the earthquake (August 10), location (Quibdó, Chocó), the age of the store (70 years), and mentions a report from Noticias Caracol. These details align with what would be expected in a cross-source consensus. The only minor deduction comes fr
Why objectivity (65): The article uses emotionally charged phrases like 'el “milagro”' and 'una imagen de la Virgen quedó intacta', which suggest a religious or miraculous interpretation of the event. This framing may influence readers’ perceptions and lacks neutrality. While it presents facts, the language leans toward
El TiempoIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 908/23/2026A magnitude 3.1 earthquake was recorded in Istmina, Chocó, Colombia, on Saturday, August 22, 2026, according to a bulletin issued by the Colombian Geological Service (SGC). The tremor had a shallow depth, less than 30 kilometers, based on monitoring systems operated by the agency. The SGC has kept its official channels open for residents who experienced the movement to report their observations, contributing to ongoing seismic activity tracking in the region. The article also includes information on activating Google’s ShakeAlert system in Colombia, which uses over 1,675 seismic sensors to detect earthquakes. It further provides safety recommendations from the National Risk Management Unit for Disasters, advising families to create emergency plans, maintain calm during tremors, and take precautions after the event.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a natural disaster and provides factual information about seismic activity, safety protocols, and emergency preparedness. While it mentions governmental agencies like the SGC and the National Risk Management Unit, the content does not present any overtly partisan perspective.
Why factuality (90): The article reports a different earthquake (magnitud 3.1) in Istmina, Chocó, on August 22 at 9:24 p.m. with a shallow depth (<30 km). The details match the expected format of an SGC report and are internally consistent. However, since this is a different event than the one described in Article 0, it
Why objectivity (90): The article remains neutral in tone, providing factual data and including practical advice on emergency preparedness. There is no indication of bias or subjective interpretation of the event.
El TiempoIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 858/15/2026 Earthquake in Chocó today August 15: the earth is still moving, earthquake of magnitude 2.5 in San Juan AndagoyaOn the morning of Saturday, August 15, a minor earthquake of magnitude 2.5 occurred in San Juan Andagoya, Chocó, Colombia, according to the updated report by the Colombian Geological Service (SGC). The quake had a shallow depth and was recorded at 12:39 AM local time. This event follows a major earthquake of magnitude 7.4 that struck Chocó on Monday, August 10, which caused significant damage across several municipalities. Since then, seismic activity has been monitored closely in the region and other parts of the country. The SGC uses a network of seismic stations and a public reporting system called 'Sismo Sentido' to track and analyze earthquakes. Citizens in areas such as Medellín, Armenia, Popayán, and others reported feeling the recent tremor.
Bias read (Center): The article provides factual information about seismic activity without taking a stance or showing bias toward any political entity, ideology, or outcome. It focuses on geological data and public monitoring systems, avoiding any political commentary or framing.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately describes the smaller tremor (magnitude 2.5) in Chocó and its relation to the main earthquake. It provides precise details about the SGC's findings and the geographical context, matching the primary source.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral and informative tone, presenting factual data without emotional language or bias. It contextualizes the event within the larger seismic activity in the country.
El TiempoIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 858/14/2026 Earthquake in Chocó: Colombian Geological Service reported several earthquakes of magnitude greater than 3 this Friday, August 14; know magnitude and depthOn Friday morning, August 14, multiple earthquakes were reported in the Colombian department of Chocó, according to the Colombian Geological Service (SGC). The most recent earthquake recorded by the SGC via its official X account had a magnitude of 3.2 in the municipality of Istmina. Earlier tremors included a 3.1 magnitude event at 3:44 a.m., located 10 kilometers from Sipí, and another 3.2 magnitude quake at 5:01 a.m. in San José del Palmar, with a depth of 89 kilometers. Additional quakes occurred later in the morning, including a 3.0 magnitude event in El Litoral del San Juan with a depth of 58 kilometers. These tremors are part of ongoing seismic activity following a major earthquake of magnitude 7.4 that struck on August 10. As of August 13, the SGC reported 160 aftershocks, with 12 exceeding magnitude 3.0 and one surpassing 4.0.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on seismic activity in Colombia, focusing on technical details such as magnitudes, depths, and locations of earthquakes. It provides information from the Colombian Geological Service and does not present any political commentary, bias, or framing that favors one side over another
Why factuality (90): The article provides precise details about the new earthquakes, including magnitudes, depths, and coordinates, sourced from the SGC. This level of detail matches the primary source and ensures accuracy.
Why objectivity (85): The tone remains neutral and informative, focusing on the scientific aspects of the seismic activity without adding subjective commentary.
El TiempoIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 908/23/2026 Two new tremors followed in Istmina, Chocó, today August 23: intensities of 2.8 and 2.6The article reports on two consecutive minor earthquakes that occurred in Istmina, Chocó, Colombia on August 23, 2026. The first tremor, measuring 2.6 on the Richter scale, was recorded at 06:50 local time, followed by a second event of magnitude 2.8 at 07:49. Both quakes had a shallow depth, less than 30 kilometers below the surface. Authorities monitoring geological activity confirmed the events and urged residents to report their perceived intensity using institutional platforms. The article also includes information on activating Google's earthquake alert system on Android devices.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about seismic activity without taking a political stance. It focuses on scientific data provided by technical authorities and offers practical guidance on emergency preparedness. There is no evident ideological framing or emphasis on specific political groups
Why factuality (85): The article reports on two minor earthquakes near Istmina, Chocó, based on official technical sources. It provides specific times, magnitudes, and depths of the tremors, aligning with typical reporting standards for seismic events. The information appears consistent with cross-source consensus as no
Why objectivity (90): The article remains neutral, presenting facts without emotional language or bias. It focuses on providing information from official sources and encourages public participation through institutional tools, maintaining an objective tone.
El TiempoIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 908/22/2026 Tremors continue in Chocó: a magnitude 3.0 earthquake shook Istmina in the early hours of this Saturday, August 22A magnitude 3.0 earthquake struck Istmina, a municipality in the department of Chocó, during the early morning of Saturday, August 22, 2026. According to the Colombian Geological Service (SGC), the event occurred at 5:32 AM and had a shallow depth. The SGC reported that the epicenter was located in Istmina and encouraged people who felt the tremor to report it through their official channels. The article also provided information on how to activate earthquake alerts on compatible devices and outlined safety recommendations before, during, and after an earthquake, including preparing emergency kits, identifying safe zones, and staying informed through official sources.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a natural disaster, specifically an earthquake, and provides factual information about its occurrence, measurement, and safety guidelines. There is no political framing, bias, or emphasis on any particular ideological perspective. The content remains neutral and informative.
Why factuality (85): The article reports a magnitude 3.0 earthquake in Istmina, Chocó, on August 22, 2026, as per the Servicio Geológico Colombiano (SGC). It provides specific details like time, location, and depth, aligning with the cross-source consensus from other articles. The information is factual and matches the
Why objectivity (90): The article presents the information neutrally, focusing on facts and recommendations from official sources. There is no emotional language or bias evident in the reporting.
El TiempoIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 908/22/2026 Tremors continue in Chocó: a new earthquake of 2.6 magnitude in Istmina today August 21; report from the SGCThe article reports on a minor earthquake measuring 2.6 on the Richter scale that struck the municipality of Istmina in the Chocó department of Colombia on August 21, 2026, at 21:41 local time. The event was detected by the Colombian Geological Service (SGC), which issued a bulletin detailing the seismic activity. The tremor had a shallow depth and was felt in nearby communities. Authorities have maintained emergency channels open for data collection and public reporting. The article also includes practical advice on preparing for earthquakes, such as creating an emergency plan, identifying safe zones, and having an emergency kit. It further provides instructions on activating Google’s ShakeAlert system and outlines recommended actions before, during, and after an earthquake.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a natural disaster without taking a clear ideological stance. While it mentions governmental agencies like the Colombian Geological Service and the National Risk Management Unit, these are presented as neutral authorities providing technical and safety-
Why factuality (85): This article confirms a magnitude 2.6 earthquake in Istmina on August 21, 2026, also reported by the SGC. It includes similar details such as time, location, and depth, consistent with the first article and cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (90): The tone remains neutral, presenting the facts without subjective interpretation. Recommendations and technical details are provided based on official guidelines without apparent bias.
SemanaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 808/14/2026 SGC confirmed two new tremors in Colombia on the morning of Friday, August 14: this was the epicenter and magnitudeOn Friday, August 14, the Colombian Geological Service (SGC) reported two new earthquakes in the country. These tremors occurred in the department of Chocó, adding to recent seismic activity following a strong earthquake on August 10, which caused structural damage and fatalities in several areas. The first quake was recorded at 5:45 a.m. with a magnitude of 3.0 and a depth of 58 kilometers, centered near El Litoral del San Juan municipality. The second, registered at 5:01 a.m., had a magnitude of 3.2 and a depth of 89 kilometers, with its epicenter in San José del Palmar. Both quakes were relatively small and not felt by most people. The SGC continues monitoring seismic activity nationwide due to Colombia’s location in a highly active tectonic zone.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on seismic activity and provides factual data from the SGC without any ideological framing, editorializing, or emphasis on political implications. It focuses purely on geological information and public safety recommendations.
Why factuality (85): The article updates the casualty and damage figures from the UNGRD, providing specific numbers and categories. It aligns with the primary source and includes additional context about infrastructure damage.
Why objectivity (80): The article is generally objective, though it uses more emotive language when describing the scale of the disaster and its impact on communities.
SemanaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 758/14/2026 The particular sound that Android emits when it detects an earthquake and seeks to alert it to react seconds beforeAfter a magnitude 7.4 earthquake shook Colombia last Monday, there has been increased attention on citizens' preparedness for such emergencies. While having an emergency kit and knowing safety measures are essential, technology like Android's seismic alert system can also play a supportive role during crises. The Colombian Geological Service (SGC) notes that earthquakes cannot be predicted, but systems can detect early movements and send alerts before stronger waves reach certain areas. One such mechanism is Google's seismic alert system, available on Android devices. This feature uses a distinct, louder sound compared to regular notifications to warn users. Camila Domínguez Posada, Google's director for Latin America, explained that the alert includes a demo within settings so users can recognize the sound and understand the screen display. She emphasized the importance of staying calm and acting according to safety recommendations upon receiving the alert. Being familiar with the sound helps users quickly identify it as a seismic warning, giving them additional seconds to take protective actions before feeling the stronger vibrations.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about a technological feature (seismic alerts on Android) without overtly favoring any political ideology. It discusses the functionality and benefits of the system neutrally, citing technical explanations and expert commentary without taking a clear stance on policy
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on the seismic alert system in Android following the magnitude 7.4 earthquake in Colombia. It references the SGC’s stance on unpredictability of earthquakes and mentions Google’s system as an example of technology aiding preparedness. The information aligns with cross-
Why objectivity (75): The article presents information neutrally but includes promotional elements by quoting a Google representative. While it explains the function of the alert system objectively, it also emphasizes the importance of user awareness and preparation, which may slightly lean towards promoting technologica
El TiempoIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 858/16/2026 Earthquake in the Chocó: Colombian Geological Service reported several earthquakes this Sunday, August 16; know magnitude and depthThe Colombian Geological Service (SGC) reported several earthquakes during the early morning of Sunday, August 16, 2026, with their epicenters in the municipality of Sipí, Chocó. Two tremors were recorded, with the first occurring at 1:35 AM with a magnitude of 2.8 and a depth less than 30 kilometers, followed by a second at 3:26 AM with a magnitude of 3.3 and similar depth. These events occurred six days after a stronger earthquake of magnitude 7.4 struck San José del Palmar in Chocó on August 10. The SGC continues monitoring seismic activity through its network and encourages citizens to report their experiences via the 'Sismo sentido' form. The article also provides information on activating Google’s ShakeAlert system and emergency preparedness guidelines.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about seismic activity without taking a political stance. It reports on scientific data provided by the SGC and includes practical advice for disaster preparedness. There is no evident ideological framing or emphasis on specific political agendas. The tone is
Why factuality (80): The article discusses the fluctuation in casualty figures and explains the reasons behind the changes, referencing the UNGRD’s process of verification. It aligns with the primary source document’s emphasis on the dynamic nature of disaster reporting. However, it lacks direct citation of the primary
Why objectivity (85): The tone is informative and explanatory, aiming to clarify why numbers change. While it acknowledges the complexity of the situation, it avoids taking sides or showing strong personal opinion.
SemanaIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 808/15/2026 New earthquake in Colombia this Saturday, August 15: SGC confirmed epicenter and magnitudeThe Servicio Geológico Colombiano (SGC) reported a new earthquake in Colombia on Saturday, August 15, at 12:48 p.m., measuring magnitude 3.1 with an epicenter in Los Santos, Santander. The SGC also mentioned a previous tremor at 12:36 p.m. with magnitude 2.7, centered in Istmina, Chocó. Experts explain that frequent seismic activity is common in certain regions of Colombia. The SGC provides safety recommendations during earthquakes, including staying calm, seeking shelter under sturdy objects, avoiding windows, and evacuating safely while being cautious of potential hazards. Additional advice includes opening doors if safe, moving to open spaces away from buildings, and driving cautiously by reducing speed and stopping in secure locations.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a natural disaster and provides factual information about seismic activity in Colombia. It does not involve political figures, policies, or contentious issues. The content is purely informational and advisory, focusing on scientific data and safety guidelines rather than any政治
Why factuality (80): The article reports on recent earthquakes, giving precise details about their magnitudes and locations. It also includes expert advice from the SGC, maintaining alignment with the primary source document’s focus on seismic monitoring and public awareness.
Why objectivity (80): The tone is informative and balanced, presenting both the scientific data and practical guidance without introducing personal opinions or biases.
SemanaIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 858/16/2026 Earthquake shook Mexico this Sunday, August 16: know the reported magnitude and depthA magnitude 5.2 earthquake struck near Puerto Madero in Mexico on Sunday, August 16, at around 10:52 a.m., according to the United States Geological Survey (USGS). The quake occurred at a depth of 35 kilometers. No additional information has been reported regarding potential damage or casualties. This event follows recent seismic activity globally, including a 7.4-magnitude earthquake in Colombia on August 10, a 7.7-magnitude quake in Indonesia, and another 5.2-magnitude tremor in Spain. These occurrences have renewed attention on the ongoing global pattern of seismic activity.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a natural disaster (earthquake) with no political implications or framing. It provides factual data from the USGS and mentions other global earthquakes without any ideological emphasis or biased language.
Why factuality (75): The article reports a 5.2 magnitude earthquake in Mexico with a depth of 35 km according to USGS, which aligns with the cross-source consensus. It provides details about location, time, and mentions other recent earthquakes globally, which is factual. However, it does not provide specific informatio
Why objectivity (85): The article presents the information neutrally, focusing on scientific data and global seismic activity. It avoids emotional language and maintains a balanced perspective by mentioning multiple events without taking sides.
El TiempoIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 808/13/2026 A strong aftershock of magnitude 4.2 was recorded in San José del Palmar, Chocó, on the morning of Thursday, August 13: the same epicenter of the earthquakeA magnitude 4.2 earthquake was recorded in San José del Palmar, Chocó, on Thursday, August 13, 2026, according to the Colombian Geological Service (SGC). The tremor occurred at 9:42 AM local time and had a depth of 95 kilometers. It was located 20 kilometers from the town and marked another seismic event in a region already experiencing frequent activity since the magnitude 7.4 earthquake on August 10. The SGC reported no injuries or material damage related to this quake. The governor of Chocó, Nubia Carolina Córdoba Curi, announced the end of the search-and-rescue phase after a family of four missing in Quibdó was found alive and receiving medical attention.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about seismic activity and the administrative response to the disaster without overt ideological framing. While it mentions the governor’s statement, it does not take a partisan stance on her actions or policies. The focus remains on objective reporting of ge
Why factuality (75): The article reports a magnitude 4.2 earthquake in San José del Palmar, Chocó, based on data from the SGC. It accurately states the time, location, depth, and provides context about ongoing seismic activity in the region. However, it does not mention the main August 10th earthquake, which may lead to
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral and informative, focusing on the facts of the recent 4.2 magnitude quake. It avoids emotional language and presents information objectively, though it briefly references previous seismic activity without taking sides or expressing concern.
SemanaIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 758/16/2026 New tremor was recorded in the Chocó this Sunday morning: they confirmed the magnitudeOn Sunday, August 16, several seismic activities were recorded across different regions of Colombia, with the most recent occurring in Sipí, Chocó. According to the Colombian Geological Service (SGC), the latest tremor had a magnitude of 3.4 and was shallow, occurring around 8:30 a.m. The earthquake's epicenter was located 13 kilometers from Sipí, 41 kilometers from Nóvita, and 53 kilometers from Medio San Juan. Some social media users reported feeling the tremor lightly in Cali, but this has not been confirmed by the SGC. Three earthquakes were registered in Sipí during the early hours of the day, including two smaller ones with magnitudes of 3.3 and 2.8. The SGC advises citizens to consult official sources for verified information, avoid spreading unverified data, and use their reporting tool to share experiences of feeling earthquakes. They also caution against believing in unconfirmed predictions and emphasize that while earthquakes cannot be predicted, continuous monitoring of seismic activity is possible.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about seismic activity in Colombia without taking a political stance. It focuses on scientific reporting and advisory guidance from the SGC, which is an official institution. There is no evident ideological framing or emphasis on specific political agendas.
Why factuality (70): This article is incomplete and ends abruptly, lacking full context or resolution. It mentions a new tremor but does not provide sufficient detail to verify its accuracy or relevance to the main event described in the primary source document.
Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat ambiguous, as the article cuts off mid-sentence. It appears to be a partial report, which may suggest a lack of complete information or editorial oversight.
CO
