ON
← Back to feed
Tanja Fajon / "Slovenia's reputation has been badly tarnished"
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsProgressive2 days ago

Tanja Fajon / "Slovenia's reputation has been badly tarnished"

Tanja Fajon, bivša zunanja ministrica Slovenije, je v popoldanski izjavi za medije izrazila bojazni, da je Slovenija zaradi umika njenega imenovanja za posebno predstavnico EU za Sahel izgubila ugled v Evropi. Po njenih besedah je postopek imenovanja zelo očrnjen, predvsem pa je zelo očrnjena Slovenija. Fajon navaja, da je premier Janez Janša in zunanji minister Tone Kajzer pošiljali dopise o nasprotovanju njej kot kandidatki. Njena kandidatura je bila preklicana zaradi pritiska vlade in Evropske ljudske stranke, kar je pripeljalo do preklica njenega imenovanja. Kajzer je v svoji izjavi izrazil sum na hude kršitve pri postopku imenovanja, medtem ko Fajon meni, da je postopek bil zakonit.

Tanja Fajon, former foreign minister of Slovenia, accused the current government of undermining her chances of becoming the European Union’s special representative for the Sahel region. In a late afternoon statement to the media, she claimed that the country's reputation has been “very blackened” due to the withdrawal of support for her nomination. She expressed concern that Slovenia might lose its opportunity to hold high-ranking positions within the EU for some time. The controversy emerged after the current administration blocked the appointment of Fajon as the special representative. According to reports, during meetings in Brussels last week with officials from the European Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS), responsible for Africa, Fajon learned that both Prime Minister Janez Janša and Foreign Minister Tone Kajzer had sent letters opposing her candidacy. The rejection came despite previous assurances of support. Fajon stated that she was deeply disappointed, noting that she had observed signs of resistance even before the final decision. She emphasized that Slovenians, based on her long experience, have rarely held high-profile roles in Brussels. She warned that this setback could delay Slovenia’s ability to secure such positions for several years. She also criticized Kajzer for claiming he was unaware of her candidacy. Fajon asserted that she had informed him on June 1, the day she took office at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. At that time, according to her account, Kajzer actively supported her. However, when the European Council announced the selection process later in the month, Kajzer reportedly congratulated her, suggesting he was aware of her candidacy. Regarding the internal process for selecting candidates in Slovenia, Fajon noted that there were allegations of serious violations. Despite these claims, she maintained that the procedure followed was legal and proper. She pointed out that similar appointments for high-level EU roles, such as leading delegations or holding positions in international organizations, have historically occurred without formal nominations from the government. Fajon further explained that the European External Action Service had confirmed that the process was fully lawful and compliant with regulations. This reassurance, however, did not prevent the eventual withdrawal of her nomination. The decision to withdraw Fajon’s nomination came after she was informed by EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Josep Borrell, that the move had been influenced by pressure from the Slovenian government and the European People’s Party. Fajon’s position was ultimately replaced by another candidate. Kajzer issued a statement today expressing concerns over the process, stating that there were indications of serious breaches. He noted that the actual nomination for the role was submitted by the general secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, who is directly subordinate to Fajon, rather than by the current government. President Nataša Pirc Musar responded to the situation, expressing disappointment in the government’s handling of the matter. Her comments reflect broader dissatisfaction among opposition parties regarding how the issue was managed.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Mladina logoMladinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 702 days ago
Tanja Fajon / "Slovenia's reputation has been badly tarnished"

Tanja Fajon, bivša zunanja ministrica Slovenije, je v popoldanski izjavi za medije izrazila bojazni, da je Slovenija zaradi umika njenega imenovanja za posebno predstavnico EU za Sahel izgubila ugled v Evropi. Po njenih besedah je postopek imenovanja zelo očrnjen, predvsem pa je zelo očrnjena Slovenija. Fajon navaja, da je premier Janez Janša in zunanji minister Tone Kajzer pošiljali dopise o nasprotovanju njej kot kandidatki. Njena kandidatura je bila preklicana zaradi pritiska vlade in Evropske ljudske stranke, kar je pripeljalo do preklica njenega imenovanja. Kajzer je v svoji izjavi izrazil sum na hude kršitve pri postopku imenovanja, medtem ko Fajon meni, da je postopek bil zakonit.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a failure of the current government to support Fajon’s candidacy, which aligns with left-leaning perspectives. The emphasis on the 'blackening' of Slovenia’s reputation due to the withdrawal of support suggests a critical view of the ruling party. The narrative is

Why factuality (85): The article reports on Tanja Fajon’s public statement regarding her exclusion from being named as an EU special representative for Sahel, citing the government's refusal. It references her claims about Slovenia's reputation being 'very darkened' and mentions communication with European Commission of

Why objectivity (70): The article presents Fajon's perspective and includes her statements, but it also attributes specific actions and reactions to political figures like Janez Janša and Tone Kajzer. While it doesn't overtly take sides, it frames the situation through Fajon's viewpoint, which may introduce bias. The lan

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories