ON
← Back to feed
Tamil Nadu Assembly: DMK MLAs evicted after sit-in protest demanding expunction of CM Vijay’s remarks on Sarkaria Commission, MISA
India🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive9/8/2026

Tamil Nadu Assembly: DMK MLAs evicted after sit-in protest demanding expunction of CM Vijay’s remarks on Sarkaria Commission, MISA

On September 8, 2026, DMK MLAs in the Tamil Nadu Assembly staged a sit-in protest and raised slogans demanding the removal of Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay's remarks regarding the Sarkaria Commission, MISA, former Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, late Murasoli Maran, and an ED dossier against the previous DMK government. Speaker J.C.D. Prabhakar directed the eviction of the MLAs, stating that the Chief Minister's comments were based on existing public records and had been previously discussed in the House. The DMK whip, E.V. Velu, argued that the Chief Minister violated assembly rules by making personal attacks and referencing absent individuals. Despite attempts to resolve the situation, the MLAs refused to leave, leading to their eviction. The Speaker emphasized the need to uphold the dignity of the House and noted global scrutiny of its proceedings.

Tamil Nadu Assembly: DMK MLAs evicted after sit-in protest over CM Vijay’s remarks on Sarkaria Commission, MISA DMK MLAs were evicted from the Tamil Nadu Assembly in Chennai on September 8, 2026, after staging a sit-in protest demanding the removal of Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay’s remarks referencing the Sarkaria Commission, the Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA), and allegations of corruption against the previous DMK government. The Speaker, J.C.D. Prabhakar, directed the watch and ward staff to remove the MLAs from the House following the protest. The controversy stemmed from Vijay’s speech on September 7, during which he cited an Enforcement Directorate (ED) document alleging that contractors paid 7.5–10% of contract values as “party funds” under the previous DMK administration. He also referenced the Sarkaria Commission report regarding the Veeranam water scheme and mentioned the arrest of former Chief Minister M.K. Stalin under MISA. These remarks sparked immediate objection from DMK Whip E.V. Velu, who argued that Vijay had violated Assembly rules by bringing up matters unrelated to his portfolio and referencing individuals not present in the House. Velu accused Vijay of making false claims about the DMK’s finances and criticized the mention of late Murasoli Maran, a prominent DMK leader. He stated that the reference to MISA was inappropriate given its repeal in 1978 and highlighted the injustice faced by M.K. Stalin, who was arrested shortly after his wedding. Velu further emphasized that the Chief Minister’s speech went beyond permissible boundaries and failed to adhere to the Assembly’s procedural norms. Speaker Prabhakar maintained that Vijay had followed the rules, citing that the ED documents were publicly available and that the references to the Sarkaria Commission and MISA were part of ongoing discussions. He noted that Vijay had completed his speech despite the protests and that the House had proceeded according to established procedures. However, the DMK MLAs remained steadfast in their demand for the removal of the remarks from the record. During the ensuing confrontation, the DMK MLAs gathered around the Speaker’s podium, chanting slogans and refusing to vacate the chamber. Despite attempts by the Speaker to persuade them to return to their seats, the situation escalated. The Speaker then instructed the House marshals to evict the protesters. Most MLAs left the Hall, though some, including Valparai MLA Kutti alias Sudhakar, resisted and caused a commotion before being escorted out. Leader of the House K.A. Sengottaiyan called for disciplinary action against the protesting legislators, stating that the Speaker’s decision was final and that the MLAs had disregarded his instructions. Meanwhile, state Law Minister R Nirmal Kumar supported Vijay’s statements, asserting that they were based on credible ED documents and prior discussions within the Assembly. The incident drew attention to broader tensions surrounding the handling of historical allegations against the DMK, with critics accusing the current government of revisiting past controversies. Some sources indicated that CPI(M) State secretary P. Shanmugam had expressed dissent over Vijay’s remarks due to a perceived misunderstanding. As the Assembly resumed its proceedings, the episode underscored the challenges of maintaining decorum in a politically charged environment. The Speaker reaffirmed the importance of upholding the dignity of the House, noting that global observers were monitoring the proceedings. The situation remains unresolved, with the focus now on the implications of the eviction and the potential fallout for the political parties involved.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentProgressiveFactual 94Objective 939/8/2026
Tamil Nadu Assembly: DMK MLAs evicted after sit-in protest demanding expunction of CM Vijay’s remarks on Sarkaria Commission, MISA

On September 8, 2026, DMK MLAs in the Tamil Nadu Assembly staged a sit-in protest and raised slogans demanding the removal of Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay's remarks regarding the Sarkaria Commission, MISA, former Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, late Murasoli Maran, and an ED dossier against the previous DMK government. Speaker J.C.D. Prabhakar directed the eviction of the MLAs, stating that the Chief Minister's comments were based on existing public records and had been previously discussed in the House. The DMK whip, E.V. Velu, argued that the Chief Minister violated assembly rules by making personal attacks and referencing absent individuals. Despite attempts to resolve the situation, the MLAs refused to leave, leading to their eviction. The Speaker emphasized the need to uphold the dignity of the House and noted global scrutiny of its proceedings.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the conflict as a violation of assembly rules by the Chief Minister, emphasizing the DMK's demands for accountability and transparency. It highlights the DMK's criticism of the Chief Minister's remarks, including references to historical figures and legal acts, suggesting a left翼/

Why factuality (94): The article provides detailed and specific information about the event including the date, participants, actions taken by the Speaker, and the reasons for the protest. It aligns closely with the second article's account of the incident, showing strong cross-source consensus. The details about the Sp

Why objectivity (93): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting facts without apparent bias. It reports events objectively, using direct quotes from officials and describing the sequence of events without editorializing or emotional language.

India Today logoIndia TodayIndependentCenterFactual 92Objective 899/8/2026
DMK MLAs evicted from TN House amid uproar over Vijay's bribe charge against party

During a session of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, DMK MLAs were evicted after protesting against Chief Minister Vijay's allegations of corruption against the previous DMK government. Vijay cited an Enforcement Directorate (ED) document and the Sarkaria Commission report to claim that contractors paid 7.5-10% of contract values as 'party funds' during the DMK's tenure. The DMK Whip, EV Velu, objected to these claims, arguing they violated Assembly rules. State Law Minister R Nirmal Kumar supported Vijay's statements, citing public-domain information. Despite the Speaker's decision not to expunge Vijay's remarks, the DMK MLAs continued their protest, leading to their eventual removal from the House.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the incident, detailing both the accusations made by the current Chief Minister and the opposition's response. It includes quotes from multiple parties involved, including the Speaker, the Law Minister, and the DMK Whip, without apparent bias toward either.

Why factuality (92): This article accurately describes the event, providing similar details to the first article such as the date, the reason for the protest, and the Speaker's decision. However, it omits some specifics like the names of certain individuals involved in the eviction process, slightly reducing its factual

Why objectivity (89): While mostly neutral, the article uses phrases like 'uproar' and 'attacking the previous DMK regime,' which may introduce a slight bias toward the current administration. It remains largely objective but shows a minor lean in favor of the current government's position.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories