ON
← Back to feed
Sudan's RSF says it captured key town near Ethiopian and South Sudan borders
AE🏛️ PoliticsCenter10 days ago

Sudan's RSF says it captured key town near Ethiopian and South Sudan borders

Sudan's Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have captured the town of Al Kurmuk, a strategically located area near the borders with Ethiopia and South Sudan. This marks the second town seized by the RSF in Blue Nile State within a week, indicating a coordinated effort to push back against the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), their main adversary since 2023. The capture of Al Kurmuk, close to the Roseires Dam, a critical power source, and the regional capital, Damazin, underscores its military and economic importance. The RSF reported driving SAF forces out of the town and seizing weapons and ammunition, though casualty figures were not provided. The ongoing Sudanese civil war, entering its fourth year, has resulted in tens of thousands of deaths and displaced around 14 million people, with the UN describing the situation as the world's worst humanitarian crisis due to widespread hunger affecting 20 million individuals.

Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF) claimed on Thursday that its troops had captured the town of Al Kurmuk, a strategically located settlement near the borders with Ethiopia and South Sudan. This marks the second such town seized by the RSF in the Blue Nile state within a week, according to local reports. The capture of Al Kurmuk is described as a significant step in the RSF’s ongoing campaign to displace the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), its primary military rival since the outbreak of the civil war in April 2023. The town lies just over 140 kilometers from Damazin, the regional capital of Blue Nile State, and approximately 160 kilometers from the Roseires Dam, a crucial hydroelectric facility that supplies much of Sudan’s electricity. Its strategic position near international borders adds to its importance, as it sits along a route that connects Sudan to both Ethiopia and South Sudan. The RSF stated in a press release that its forces drove out SAF combatants from the town and seized substantial quantities of weapons and ammunition. While no casualties were officially reported, video clips circulating online show RSF soldiers celebrating their success. Earlier in the week, the RSF had already captured the town of Qayssan, also in Blue Nile State, where it reportedly enjoys support from a prominent rebel faction. The SAF has not issued any public response to these losses, suggesting either a lack of immediate countermeasures or a deliberate strategy to avoid drawing attention to its vulnerabilities. These territorial gains appear to be part of a broader effort by the RSF to consolidate control over key regions and challenge the SAF’s dominance in the country. The RSF’s advances follow recent battlefield successes by the SAF in Kordofan state, a central region that has seen intense fighting since the army lost its last stronghold in Darfur late last year. The conflict has shifted increasingly toward Kordofan, where the RSF and its allies continue their efforts to secure the area following their near-complete control of Darfur. Meanwhile, the SAF maintains control over the capital, Khartoum, as well as the northern, eastern, and central regions of the country. The war, now in its fourth year, has resulted in widespread devastation. According to the United Nations, the conflict has triggered one of the worst humanitarian crises globally, with an estimated 20 million people facing severe food shortages. Over 14 million individuals have been displaced since the violence began in early 2023. The death toll continues to rise, though exact numbers remain difficult to confirm due to the chaotic nature of the conflict and limited access to affected areas. In addition to the ground operations, the RSF has intensified its aerial campaigns, with reports indicating that suspected drones struck multiple locations across Sudan. On Wednesday, residents in Khartoum and surrounding areas reported explosions and smoke plumes attributed to drone attacks. These strikes targeted military installations, including the Fifth Infantry Division’s base in Al Obeid, a city in Kordofan state that has been under prolonged siege by the RSF. While the RSF did not comment on the attacks, the timing suggests a coordinated escalation of pressure against the SAF. The conflict between the RSF and the SAF has deep roots, dating back to years of political tensions between General Abdel Fattah Al Burhan, head of the Sudanese Armed Forces, and General Mohamed Dagalo, leader of the RSF. Their rivalry, initially centered on governance and military authority, escalated into outright warfare in April 2023. Since then, the country has descended into chaos, with civilians bearing the brunt of the violence. As the war enters its fourth year, the situation shows little sign of abating, with both sides continuing to vie for control over critical territories and resources.

2 reports

The National logoThe NationalParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 8510 days ago
Sudan's RSF says it captured key town near Ethiopian and South Sudan borders

Sudan's Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have captured the town of Al Kurmuk, a strategically located area near the borders with Ethiopia and South Sudan. This marks the second town seized by the RSF in Blue Nile State within a week, indicating a coordinated effort to push back against the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), their main adversary since 2023. The capture of Al Kurmuk, close to the Roseires Dam, a critical power source, and the regional capital, Damazin, underscores its military and economic importance. The RSF reported driving SAF forces out of the town and seizing weapons and ammunition, though casualty figures were not provided. The ongoing Sudanese civil war, entering its fourth year, has resulted in tens of thousands of deaths and displaced around 14 million people, with the UN describing the situation as the world's worst humanitarian crisis due to widespread hunger affecting 20 million individuals.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on military developments in Sudan's civil war without overtly favoring either side. It provides balanced information about both the RSF's actions and the broader context of the conflict, including casualties, displacement, and international assessments. While it

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the RSF's claim of capturing Al Kurmuk and contextualizes it within the broader conflict. It references the strategic importance of the location and aligns with the cross-source consensus on the ongoing conflict and humanitarian impact.

Why objectivity (85): The article remains largely neutral in tone, presenting facts from the RSF's announcement without taking sides. It includes relevant background on the conflict and its consequences, avoiding biased language or overtly favorable framing toward either party.

The National logoThe NationalParty-alignedCenterFactual 75Objective 8011 days ago
Suspected RSF drones attack areas in Sudan including Khartoum and Al Obeid

Drones suspected to have been launched by Sudan's paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) struck multiple locations in Sudan, including Khartoum, Al Obeid, and Atbara, according to resident accounts. The attacks occurred in areas with significant military presence, such as army bases in Khartoum's western suburbs and the Fifth Infantry Division base in Al Obeid. Reports indicated at least two deaths and six injuries, though these figures remain unconfirmed. The incidents followed the RSF's capture of Qayssan and came amid ongoing clashes between the RSF and Sudanese Armed Forces, which have led to widespread displacement and a severe humanitarian crisis. Neither the RSF nor the Sudanese Armed Forces have officially commented on the drone attacks.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the drone attacks without overtly favoring either side. It cites resident reports and mentions both the RSF and Sudanese Armed Forces as involved parties without taking a clear stance. While the conflict itself is politically charged, the framing remains non

Why factuality (75): The article provides detailed accounts from residents and mentions specific locations like Khartoum, Al Obeid, and Atbara, aligning with the cross-source consensus that RSF drones conducted attacks. However, some details such as the exact number of casualties and confirmation of the attacks remain u

Why objectivity (80): The article presents information from resident reports and media without overt bias, though it acknowledges uncertainty regarding verification. It avoids strong editorializing, maintaining a relatively neutral tone despite describing violent events.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories