ON
← Back to feed
Suspect charged in cross-burning says it was anti-Trump protest, not hate crime
United States👮 CrimeLean Conservative20 days ago

Suspect charged in cross-burning says it was anti-Trump protest, not hate crime

A 21-year-old man, Merlin Lu, was charged with hate crimes and other offenses for setting a cross on fire in Chicago's Grant Park. Lu claimed the act was a protest against President Trump and not a hate crime. He stated he had no racial intent and denied any ties to white supremacist groups. However, the university confirmed that there is no current student by that name.

A 21-year-old man, Merlin Lu, has been charged with multiple offenses, including a hate crime and arson, after allegedly setting a cross on fire in Chicago’s Grant Park on June 9. The incident initially sparked concern among local authorities and community leaders, who feared it might be linked to white supremacist activity. However, Lu has publicly admitted to setting the cross alight, stating that his actions were part of a protest against the Trump administration rather than an expression of racial animus. According to reports, Lu described the cross-burning as a symbolic act targeting the "ruling class" and Christian nationalists who support former President Donald Trump.

Authorities confirmed that Lu faces four felony charges and four misdemeanor charges, which include the specific charge of a hate crime and burning a cross to intimidate others. Police issued a statement detailing the nature of these charges, emphasizing the seriousness of the allegations. Despite his admission of responsibility, Lu maintains that his intentions were not racially motivated. He expressed regret over the interpretation of his actions, acknowledging that the historical significance of the cross may have led to misunderstandings. Lu emphasized that his protest had nothing to do with race or gender, focusing instead on political opposition to the current administration.

In interviews with local media, Lu elaborated on his motivations, explaining that he sought to challenge the influence of the "ruling class" and Christian nationalist groups aligned with Trump. He referenced placing a red baseball cap on the cross, possibly as a direct critique of Trump’s signature "Make America Great Again" slogan. This detail adds another layer to the narrative, suggesting that Lu aimed to make a pointed political statement rather than engage in racial intimidation. His LinkedIn profile indicates that he previously studied chemistry at universities in Indiana and Chicago, shedding light on his educational background prior to the incident.

The situation took an unexpected turn when a large, multicolored, glass fiber heart bearing the word "resilient" was later placed at the site of the burned cross. This gesture appears to reflect a counter-narrative, highlighting themes of resilience and resistance against perceived oppressive forces. While the identity of the person who placed the heart remains unknown, it underscores the complex public reaction to the event. Some viewed the cross-burning as a troubling resurgence of racial hatred, while others saw it as a form of political dissent.

Reactions to the incident varied widely. Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker condemned the act during a speech, linking it to broader concerns about the rise of racism and fascism in the United States. Similarly, the Rainbow PUSH Coalition, a civil rights organization founded by Reverend Jesse Jackson, described the event as a painful reminder of ongoing threats to an inclusive society. These responses highlight the deep divisions within the community regarding the meaning and implications of such acts. Meanwhile, some media outlets, including the Associated Press, connected the incident to the legacy of former President Barack Obama, noting that the location of the cross-burning coincided with where Obama gave his acceptance speech as the first Black president.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson expressed strong disapproval of the event, stating that hate has no place in the city. However, he refrained from commenting directly on Lu’s claims of non-racial motivation, instead focusing on the broader issue of hate crimes. As the legal proceedings unfold, the case continues to generate significant public interest, with many awaiting further developments regarding Lu’s defense and potential legal outcomes. The incident raises important questions about the intersection of political activism, symbolism, and the interpretation of hate crimes in contemporary society.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

3 reports

The New York Times (US) logoThe New York Times (US)Independent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 8520 days ago
Man Charged With Hate Crime Over Burning Cross in Chicago Park

A 21-year-old former university student, Merlin Lu, has been charged with a hate crime after burning a cross in Chicago's Grant Park. Lu claims the act was a protest against the Trump administration rather than an expression of racism.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the charge of a hate crime and Lu's claim of protest without taking a stance on either. It does not use loaded language or favor one perspective over the other.

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Highly factual with clear details about the individual and his claim. Slightly lower on objectivity due to presenting the defendant's statement without explicit balancing from other perspectives.

ABC News (US) logoABC News (US)IndependentCenterFactual 94Objective 7820 days ago
Man who admitted setting cross on fire in Chicago park is charged with a hate crime

A 21-year-old man, Merlin Lu, has been charged with a hate crime, arson, and other offenses after admitting to setting a cross on fire in Chicago's Grant Park. Lu claimed the act was a protest against President Donald Trump and denied any racial motivation, stating his protest was against the 'ruling class' and not related to race or gender.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the charges against Merlin Lu and his defense without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from Lu explaining his intentions and does not editorialize or imply judgment on the matter. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the facts of the case and the

Why these scores (Factual 94 · Objective 78): Highly factual with detailed quotes and context from the suspect. The article accurately reports the charges, the suspect's statements, and additional details like the replacement heart. Slightly less objective due to some direct quotes that reflect the suspect's perspective.

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesParty-alignedConservativeFactual 92Objective 7520 days ago
Suspect charged in cross-burning says it was anti-Trump protest, not hate crime

A 21-year-old man, Merlin Lu, was charged with hate crimes and other offenses for setting a cross on fire in Chicago's Grant Park. Lu claimed the act was a protest against President Trump and not a hate crime. He stated he had no racial intent and denied any ties to white supremacist groups. However, the university confirmed that there is no current student by that name.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the incident as a protest against Trump rather than a hate crime, emphasizing the suspect's non-racial motives and his denial of white supremacist affiliations. It highlights the individual's perspective without providing substantial counter-narratives or contextualizing the legal

Why these scores (Factual 92 · Objective 75): Accurate reporting with correct details about the suspect, charges, and his statements. However, the headline implies a conclusion that the cross-burning was not by white supremacists, which slightly skews the neutrality. The article includes relevant background but leans slightly toward the suspect

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories