ON
← Back to feed
Supreme Court refuses to roll back directions on illegally diverted forest land
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter4 hr. ago

Supreme Court refuses to roll back directions on illegally diverted forest land

The Supreme Court of India has upheld its directive requiring states and Union Territories to form Special Investigation Teams (SITs) to identify and reclaim reserved forest land that has been illegally allocated to private entities. The court rejected a curative petition challenging its 2025 ruling in the Richie Rich Cooperative Housing Society case, where 11.89 hectares of reserved forest land in Pune were unlawfully granted to a housing society in 1999. The judgment emphasized the need to adhere to the Forest Conservation Act and highlighted the failure of authorities to follow legal procedures during the allocation. The court also referenced past rulings, including the landmark TN Godavarman case, to reinforce the importance of protecting forested areas. The decision mandates that chief secretaries of states and UT administrators establish SITs to investigate potential illegal land transfers and ensure the restoration of such lands to forest departments.

1 reports

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentCenter4 hr. ago
Supreme Court refuses to roll back directions on illegally diverted forest land

The Supreme Court of India has upheld its directive requiring states and Union Territories to form Special Investigation Teams (SITs) to identify and reclaim reserved forest land that has been illegally allocated to private entities. The court rejected a curative petition challenging its 2025 ruling in the Richie Rich Cooperative Housing Society case, where 11.89 hectares of reserved forest land in Pune were unlawfully granted to a housing society in 1999. The judgment emphasized the need to adhere to the Forest Conservation Act and highlighted the failure of authorities to follow legal procedures during the allocation. The court also referenced past rulings, including the landmark TN Godavarman case, to reinforce the importance of protecting forested areas. The decision mandates that chief secretaries of states and UT administrators establish SITs to investigate potential illegal land transfers and ensure the restoration of such lands to forest departments.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the Supreme Court's decision without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on judicial actions regarding environmental law enforcement and does not exhibit biased language or selective sourcing.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories