Sudan's RSF closes in on Al Obeid as UN warned of imminent atrocities
Sudan's Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a paramilitary group, is advancing toward Al Obeid in the North Kordofan region, which is currently held by the Sudanese army. The city has experienced significant disruptions due to RSF drone strikes targeting both military and civilian infrastructure, including the main power station, leading to power outages, water shortages, and hospital operations being affected. Residents report that life remains mostly normal despite these challenges, though fuel shortages persist after attacks on gas stations. Videos circulating online show RSF fighters claiming they will capture Al Obeid within days. Al Obeid is strategically important as it houses the army's 5th Infantry Division and serves as a major commercial hub. Losing this city would be a significant setback for the army, similar to their previous loss of El Fasher in Darfur, which led to widespread atrocities by the RSF. In response, multiple countries, including Norway, Britain, France, and Germany, have raised concerns at the UN Human Rights Council, warning of potential large-scale atrocities if the RSF escalates its assault on Al Obeid.
The United Nations Security Council has issued a stark warning regarding the escalating conflict in Sudan, highlighting the "imminent risk of mass atrocities" as paramilitary forces continue their advance toward the city of El-Obeid. This development marks a critical moment in a protracted civil war that has already claimed tens of thousands of lives and displaced over 11 million people. The situation in El-Obeid, located in the Kordofan region, has drawn global attention due to its strategic importance and the increasing threat posed by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). Reports suggest that the RSF has been encircling the city for several months, intensifying pressure on local populations and raising alarms among humanitarian organizations and international leaders.
The RSF, a powerful paramilitary group loyal to former military leader Mohamed Hamdan Dagolo, has been locked in a brutal struggle with the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) since April 2023. This conflict has led to widespread destruction, with entire communities caught in the crossfire. The current push toward El-Obeid is part of a broader campaign by the RSF to gain control of key urban centers, potentially altering the balance of power in the ongoing conflict. According to recent statements from the UN Security Council, the RSF's approach to El-Obeid mirrors tactics used in previous offensives, particularly the infamous attack on El-Fasher in October 2024, which the UN described as bearing "hallmarks of genocide." These historical precedents have fueled fears that a similar pattern could unfold in El-Obeid, putting hundreds of thousands of civilians at risk.
The humanitarian situation in Sudan remains dire, with famine and disease threatening the survival of millions. The UN has repeatedly emphasized that the conflict has created the world's largest displacement and hunger crises. In El-Obeid alone, reports indicate that nearly 500,000 residents are living under constant threat, with daily drone attacks and artillery bombardments disrupting essential services such as electricity, water, and medical care. Residents describe life in the city as increasingly precarious, with basic necessities becoming harder to obtain. A recent incident saw RSF drones strike the city's main power station, plunging the area into darkness and cutting off vital resources for thousands of households.
International responses to the unfolding crisis have been swift and coordinated. The United Nations has called for an immediate cessation of hostilities, urging both the RSF and the SAF to prioritize civilian protection. Special envoy Pekka Haavisto has engaged directly with RSF leadership, emphasizing the urgent need to de-escalate tensions and prevent further loss of life. Meanwhile, the United States has joined the chorus of voices demanding an end to the violence, issuing a strong condemnation of the RSF's actions and calling for a negotiated resolution to the conflict. The U.S. State Department has warned that continued escalation could lead to "mass atrocities" and has reiterated its commitment to supporting humanitarian efforts in the region.
Amid these developments, the role of international diplomacy has come under renewed scrutiny. Countries such as Norway, Britain, France, and Germany have all raised concerns at the UN Human Rights Council, urging the international community to exert maximum pressure on both sides to protect civilians. A coalition of nations has formally called for the RSF to halt its assault on El-Obeid, emphasizing the moral imperative to prevent further atrocities. However, the effectiveness of these diplomatic interventions remains uncertain, given the entrenched nature of the conflict and the lack of willingness among warring factions to engage in meaningful peace talks.
As the situation in El-Obeid deteriorates, the focus is shifting toward the potential for large-scale displacement and the long-term implications for regional stability. The city's strategic location—situated along a crucial corridor between RSF-controlled areas in Darfur and SAF-controlled regions in the east—makes it a focal point in the broader struggle for dominance. If the RSF succeeds in capturing El-Obeid, it could mark a significant turning point in the war, potentially leading to a shift in control over key territories and resources. However, the cost of such an outcome would likely be measured in human lives, with the prospect of renewed waves of violence and suffering looming over the region.
Looking ahead, the international community faces a difficult challenge in balancing humanitarian intervention with the realities of political and military dynamics on the ground. While the UN and other global actors have made clear their commitment to preventing further atrocities, the path forward will require sustained engagement, increased funding for relief operations, and a renewed effort to bring the conflicting parties to the negotiating table. For now, the people of El-Obeid remain in limbo, awaiting the outcome of a conflict that threatens to redefine the future of Sudan itself.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
The United Nations Security Council has expressed deep concern over the 'imminent risk of mass atrocities' in Sudan, particularly as paramilitary forces known as the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) continue their advance toward El-Obeid in the Kordofan region. The council urged the RSF to cease its attack on the city, citing fears of worsening the already dire humanitarian crisis in the country. Fighting between the RSF and the Sudanese Army has led to widespread displacement, with over 11 million people forced from their homes and nearly half of Sudan's population facing food insecurity. The UN has warned that the ongoing conflict could lead to a repeat of the violence seen in El-Fasher, where over 6,000 people were reportedly killed in three days, with the UN describing the events there as showing 'hallmarks of genocide.'
Bias read (Center): The article presents the UN's warnings and statements from the Security Council without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from the UN and mentions the humanitarian impact without taking a stance on which group is responsible for the atrocities. The framing remains neutral, with
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Consistent with other reports on the humanitarian crisis and RSF activities. Neutral tone, though some emotional language is used.
SBS NewsState / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 8518 days ago
The United Nations Security Council has warned of an 'imminent risk of mass atrocities' in Sudan, specifically concerning the ongoing conflict in El-Obeid, a city in the Kordofan region. The city has been under siege for several months by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which have been engaged in a conflict with the Sudanese military since April 2023. The UN expressed concerns about the possibility of repeating the atrocities seen during the October 2025 assault on El-Fasher, which showed signs of genocide. UN Secretary-General's special envoy for Sudan, Pekka Haavisto, has urged RSF leader Mohamed Hamdan Daglo to stop attacking El-Obeid and has worked with international actors to promote dialogue and de-escalation. The conflict has caused widespread destruction, killing tens of thousands and displacing over 11 million people, leading to severe humanitarian challenges.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the UN's warning and calls for action without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from the UN Security Council and mentions efforts by the UN envoy to de-escalate the situation, providing balanced information without biased language or selective sourcing.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Accurate and detailed report from the UN Security Council, aligns with other sources. Maintains a neutral tone despite the gravity of the situation.
Hurriyet Daily NewsParty-alignedCenterFactual 90Objective 8520 days ago
The United Nations has urged the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Sudan to stop an 'imminent offensive' against the city of El-Obeid, warning of potential large-scale violence and harm to civilians. U.N. officials expressed concern over increased military activity, including troop movements, drone strikes, and artillery shelling. The conflict in Sudan began in April 2023 between the Sudanese armed forces and the RSF. El-Obeid, located in North Kordofan state, is strategically important and has been under partial siege-like conditions for months.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the U.N.'s concerns regarding the situation in Sudan without apparent ideological framing. It quotes U.N. officials and describes the military actions and humanitarian risks objectively, with no evident bias toward any side.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Accurate and detailed report from the UN, aligns with other sources. Maintains a neutral tone despite the gravity of the situation.
Daily SabahParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 8017 days ago
The United Nations Security Council issued a warning about an 'imminent risk of mass atrocities' in Sudan, specifically concerning the city of el-Obeid, which has been under siege by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) since April 2023. The council urged the RSF to stop its advance and called for an immediate cessation of hostilities between conflicting parties. The UN expressed concerns about a possible repetition of atrocities similar to those seen during the October 2024 assault on el-Fasher, which was described as having 'hallmarks of genocide.' UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres' special envoy, Pekka Haavisto, contacted RSF leader Mohamed Hamdan Daglo to urge him not to attack el-Obeid and emphasized the need to de-escalate tensions. Aid organizations are preparing for a potential influx of civilians fleeing the area, highlighting the severe humanitarian crisis caused by the ongoing conflict, which has resulted in tens of thousands of deaths and over 11 million displacements.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the UN Security Council's warnings and calls for action regarding the situation in Sudan, focusing on the risks of mass atrocities and the humanitarian crisis. It includes statements from both the Security Council and the UN spokesperson, providing balanced perspectives without顯
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): Consistent with other reports on the humanitarian crisis and RSF activities. Slightly biased toward US concerns, but remains generally objective.
Al Jazeera EnglishState / PublicProgressiveFactual 80Objective 7516 days ago
The United States has raised concerns over the potential for 'mass atrocities' in Sudan as the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a paramilitary group, reportedly surround the city of el-Obeid. The U.S. State Department warned that further escalation could devastate civilians and reiterated calls for a negotiated resolution to the ongoing conflict between the RSF and Sudan's military, which began in April 2023. This conflict has already resulted in tens of thousands of deaths and displaced millions, creating one of the worst humanitarian crises globally. The UN has compared the potential assault on el-Obeid to the October 2025 attack on el-Fasher, which was described as having 'hallmarks of genocide.' The UN Human Rights Council reported that 500,000 civilians in el-Obeid could face atrocities if the RSF attacks, with 50 civilians killed in drone strikes over 10 days in the region.
Bias read (Progressive): The article emphasizes the potential for 'mass atrocities,' references international humanitarian law, and highlights civilian casualties and humanitarian suffering. It quotes the U.S. State Department calling for protection of civilians and adherence to international norms, aligning with a leftward
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 75): Factuality is good as it reports US concerns and the situation in Sudan with some specifics. Objectivity is slightly lower due to the focus on the RSF's actions and the warnings from multiple countries, which may imply a particular perspective.
The NationalParty-alignedCenterFactual 80Objective 7518 days ago
Sudan's Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a paramilitary group, is advancing toward Al Obeid in the North Kordofan region, which is currently held by the Sudanese army. The city has experienced significant disruptions due to RSF drone strikes targeting both military and civilian infrastructure, including the main power station, leading to power outages, water shortages, and hospital operations being affected. Residents report that life remains mostly normal despite these challenges, though fuel shortages persist after attacks on gas stations. Videos circulating online show RSF fighters claiming they will capture Al Obeid within days. Al Obeid is strategically important as it houses the army's 5th Infantry Division and serves as a major commercial hub. Losing this city would be a significant setback for the army, similar to their previous loss of El Fasher in Darfur, which led to widespread atrocities by the RSF. In response, multiple countries, including Norway, Britain, France, and Germany, have raised concerns at the UN Human Rights Council, warning of potential large-scale atrocities if the RSF escalates its assault on Al Obeid.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the situation in Al Obeid, detailing actions taken by both the RSF and the Sudanese army, as well as international reactions. There is no overtly biased language, and the framing appears neutral, focusing on reported events and statements from various sides
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 75): Report focuses on Amnesty International's findings regarding El Fasher, includes survivor accounts. Less focused on current events and more on historical context, reducing objectivity.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
