Subsidy: Kwankwaso says NDC will do ‘whatever necessary’ to reduce petrol prices
Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, the vice-presidential candidate of Nigeria's Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), stated that the party is willing to take 'whatever necessary' actions, including reinstating petrol subsidies, to lower fuel prices if elected in the 2027 general election. This comes amid concerns over the economic effects of President Bola Tinubu's decision to remove petrol subsidies in May 2023, which caused a significant rise in fuel prices and increased transportation and living costs. Kwankwaso emphasized that Nigerians have not yet recovered from the initial shock of the subsidy removal and argued that energy costs remain unacceptably high. He noted that the NDC has studied past experiences, including the tenure of its presidential candidate Peter Obi as Anambra State governor and his own time as Kano State governor, to develop strategies for addressing the nation's economic challenges. The NDC's proposal aims to alleviate the financial strain on citizens, especially those struggling to afford basic needs.
Bayo Onanuga, the special adviser to President Bola Tinubu on information and strategy, rejected the explanation offered by Peter Obi regarding controversial remarks made about Nigerians in the diaspora. On Wednesday, Onanuga posted on the social media platform X that the former Anambra State Governor had failed to clarify his statements made in Manchester. The presidential spokesman insisted that Obi’s original message was not misrepresented by political opponents. Instead, Onanuga argued that Obi’s recent statement merely reaffirmed his earlier comments. “Mr Peter Obi, you failed to clarify your Manchester callous statement. Nobody twisted your statement. Thank you for affirming it again,” Onanuga wrote. This dispute follows a clarification issued by Obi on Tuesday. The Nigeria Democratic Congress presidential candidate accused political rivals of distorting his views on financial support from the diaspora. Obi stated that he deeply appreciated the sacrifices made by Nigerians living abroad to support their families. He noted that these remittances cover essential costs such as school fees, hospital bills, rent, and food. Obi emphasized that he never suggested that expatriates should abandon their relatives. “I deeply appreciate Nigerians in the diaspora who work tirelessly and make enormous sacrifices to support their families back home,” Obi said in a post titled “My Message Has Been Twisted.” Obi explained that his intent was to highlight the economic conditions that force millions of Nigerians to rely on overseas relatives for basic survival. He argued that the nation should not remain dependent on external funds for fundamental needs. “Our goal must be to build a nation that provides jobs, affordable healthcare, quality education, and economic opportunities for its citizens,” Obi wrote. He asserted that his comments were designed to urge the government to create an environment where residents could meet their needs domestically. “Political opponents may twist my message, but the truth remains clear: I am not asking Nigerians abroad to abandon their families. I am advocating for a Nigeria that will no longer abandon its own people,” he added. The controversy originated from a town hall meeting held in Manchester on Sunday. During the event, Obi addressed diaspora supporters in a video that subsequently circulated widely online. In the footage, Obi urged Nigerians in the United Kingdom to refuse requests for money from relatives at home. He argued that providing such financial aid might alleviate immediate hardship without resolving the root causes of economic difficulty. “You have people at home in Nigeria today who are begging you for money. Tell them no!” Obi said in the recording. He attributed the country’s economic struggles to poor leadership. Obi encouraged those abroad to persuade their relatives and friends to elect officials who prioritize productivity and economic growth. Onanuga’s rebuttal comes amid broader discussions regarding the administration’s economic performance. Earlier this week, the presidential spokesman defended the government’s track record against criticism from media personalities. Onanuga cited falling food prices, increased foreign reserves, and improved access to foreign exchange as signs of progress under President Tinubu, who took office in May 2023. He specifically referenced the cost of staple foods, claiming that the price of a bag of rice had dropped significantly. Onanuga stated that a preferred variety of rice, previously priced at approximately 120,000 naira, now sells for less than 50,000 naira. In his hometown, he noted, the price is around 45,000 naira. The adviser also highlighted improvements in the financial sector. He pointed to Nigeria’s foreign reserves, which he described as approaching 60 billion dollars. Onanuga noted that Nigerians can now use naira-denominated bank cards internationally, a capability he said was unavailable prior to the current presidency. He further argued that business owners can secure foreign currency to import raw materials and equipment, facilitating operational activities. Onanuga disputed claims that incoming investment consists primarily of portfolio investments. He maintained that foreign direct investment is entering the country to generate employment. “Investors are coming back, not mainly as portfolio investors... These investors belong in the category of FDI. They bring money into our economy and create jobs,” he wrote. Onanuga also addressed the stance of state executives. He declared that the support of 33 state governors for the president demonstrated confidence in the administration’s direction. “Thirty-three governors cannot be wrong in casting their support for President Tinubu,” he stated. The adviser criticized television anchors for persistently promoting narratives that suggest no positive changes have occurred since 2023. He advised broadcasters to verify market conditions themselves rather than relying on outdated perspectives. Onanuga concluded his defense by asserting that the available facts demonstrate economic stability and growth, challenging critics to look beyond partisan biases. He described the current leadership as having established a solid foundation for the economy, positioning the nation for future shared prosperity.
Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), has denied claims that he told Nigerians living in the United Kingdom to abandon relatives who depend on them financially. Obi clarified that his message about Nigeria's economic challenges was misunderstood and misrepresented by political opponents. He emphasized that his concerns were about the country's reliance on remittances and the need to create local opportunities rather than discourage financial support for families. The clarification came after a viral video showed Obi urging Nigerians in the UK to refuse requests for money from relatives in Nigeria, arguing that this would not address the root causes of the country's economic struggles. Obi stressed that his goal is to build a self-sufficient Nigeria that provides jobs, healthcare, and education for all citizens.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both Obi's statements and the context of the controversy surrounding them, including his clarification and the accusations of misrepresentation by political opponents. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or one-sided sourcing, providing a balanced account of the issue.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Obi's denial of asking Nigerians in the UK to abandon family members, citing his statement on X. It includes direct quotes from Obi and explains the context of his concerns about Nigeria's reliance on remittances. The facts align with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (90): The article presents Obi's statements neutrally, using direct quotes and avoiding overtly biased language. It acknowledges his accusations against political opponents without taking sides, maintaining a balanced tone.
Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, the vice-presidential candidate of Nigeria's Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), stated that the party is willing to take 'whatever necessary' actions, including reinstating petrol subsidies, to lower fuel prices if elected in the 2027 general election. This comes amid concerns over the economic effects of President Bola Tinubu's decision to remove petrol subsidies in May 2023, which caused a significant rise in fuel prices and increased transportation and living costs. Kwankwaso emphasized that Nigerians have not yet recovered from the initial shock of the subsidy removal and argued that energy costs remain unacceptably high. He noted that the NDC has studied past experiences, including the tenure of its presidential candidate Peter Obi as Anambra State governor and his own time as Kano State governor, to develop strategies for addressing the nation's economic challenges. The NDC's proposal aims to alleviate the financial strain on citizens, especially those struggling to afford basic needs.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a direct quote from a political figure discussing potential policy changes related to fuel subsidies. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The content remains focused on the political stance of the NDC without evident slant.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Kwankwaso's statements regarding the NDC's potential approach to reducing fuel prices, citing his interview on Channels Television. It provides context about the removal of the petrol subsidy under President Tinubu and references Kwankwaso's experience as a former gove
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the information in a relatively neutral manner, quoting Kwankwaso directly and providing background context. However, there is a slight emphasis on the negative impacts of the subsidy removal, which may subtly frame the situation in favor of the NDC's stance.
Rabiu Kwankwaso, the vice-presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), defended the party's presidential candidate, Peter Obi, against criticism from Vice President Kashim Shettima. Shettima accused Obi of using 'bogus statistics' and making 'incoherent economic prescriptions,' mocking Obi's comparisons between Nigeria and other countries like Bangladesh. In response, Kwankwaso stated that most of Obi's figures were accurate and suggested that any errors were minor slips rather than deliberate falsehoods. He praised Obi's understanding of global development statistics and emphasized their shared vision for Nigeria, which led to their collaboration under the NDC.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the exchange between Kwankwaso and Shettima without overtly favoring either. It quotes directly from both parties involved and does not introduce biased language or selective omissions. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the back-and-forth dialogue ratherthan
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the exchange between Kwankwaso and Shettima regarding Obi's statistical claims. It includes direct quotes from both parties and provides context about the political setting. However, it does not provide specific examples of which of Obi's figures were 'correct' or 'inc
Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting statements from both sides of the political debate. However, it uses phrases like 'mocked his comparisons' and 'I don't think he was correct,' which may subtly favor Kwankwaso's perspective.
Bayo Onanuga, the Special Adviser to Nigerian President Bola Tinubu on Information and Strategy, criticized Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, for failing to clarify his comments about Nigerians living abroad. Onanuga claimed that Obi's original message was not distorted and that Obi's recent statement reaffirmed his earlier remarks. Obi had previously stated that he appreciates the sacrifices and financial contributions of Nigerians in the diaspora, emphasizing that their remittances help support families back home. However, Obi clarified that he did not ask Nigerians abroad to abandon their loved ones but expressed concern that many depend on overseas relatives for basic needs. He called for the creation of opportunities within Nigeria to reduce reliance on foreign financial support.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both Onanuga's criticism of Obi and Obi's clarification of his stance, providing balanced perspectives without overtly favoring either side. There is no evident loaded language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context that would indicate a clear ideological lean.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reflects the public exchange between Bayo Onanuga and Peter Obi regarding the 'diaspora' comments. It correctly attributes the specific quotes ('Nobody twisted your statement') to Onanuga and summarizes Obi's defense (appreciation for remittances vs. need for domestic opportun
Why objectivity (60): The headline uses somewhat combative phrasing ('tackles'), though this mirrors the aggressive tone of the source material itself. The body text remains largely descriptive, quoting both sides directly. However, by leading with Onanuga's rebuttal and framing Obi's previous statement as a failure to c
The PunchIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 40
Bayo Onanuga, the Special Adviser to Nigerian President Bola Tinubu on Information and Strategy, defended the president's economic policies, asserting that 33 state governors' support for Tinubu proves the administration's success. Onanuga highlighted falling food prices, increased foreign reserves, improved access to foreign exchange, and renewed foreign investment as signs of progress since Tinubu took office in May 2023. He criticized TV anchors for questioning these improvements, claiming they promote the opposition's narrative that little has changed since 2023. Onanuga cited specific examples such as the drop in rice prices from N120,000 to below N50,000 and noted that Nigeria's foreign reserves are nearing $60 billion. He emphasized that foreign direct investment, rather than just portfolio investment, is contributing to the economy.
Bias read (Conservative): The article presents a strong defense of President Tinubu's economic policies through the voice of his special adviser, using selective data and emphasizing positive outcomes while criticizing opposing viewpoints. This framing supports the administration's stance and downplays challenges or dissent,
Why factuality (75): The article presents statements from Bayo Onanuga, the presidential adviser, regarding economic improvements under Tinubu. The claims about falling food prices and economic indicators are based on his assertions but lack independent verification or citation of specific data sources like NBS statisti
Why objectivity (40): The article exhibits clear bias in favor of the Tinubu administration, using dismissive language toward critics ('ridiculous', 'parroting the old narrative') and presenting Onanuga's statements uncritically. It frames dissenting voices as part of an 'opposition' agenda rather than offering balanced
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
NG
