ON
← Back to feed
Strangler fig-inspired high-rise planned for South Brisbane
Australia🏛️ PoliticsCenter9/1/2026

Strangler fig-inspired high-rise planned for South Brisbane

A residential tower inspired by strangler fig trees has been proposed for a South Brisbane site, aiming to increase housing supply in the inner city. Developers, Milton 1, have applied to redevelop a private car park into a 29-story building with 350 rooming accommodations, commercial spaces, and public amenities. The project falls under the Kurilpa Sustainable Growth Precinct, allowing taller buildings in exchange for sustainability and design standards. The design features a narrow, 'slender tower' form with a curved facade inspired by plant vines. The development includes public open space, bike facilities, and minimal car parking, reflecting a focus on affordability and urban integration.

A 29-storey residential tower inspired by the growth patterns of strangler fig trees has been proposed for a narrow site in South Brisbane. Developers behind the project, Milton 1, have submitted an application to redevelop a cross-block link between 37 Cordelia Street and 42 Manning Street, currently occupied as a private car park. The proposal includes a mix of rooming accommodation, ground-floor commercial spaces, and a publicly accessible arcade. The development, designed by Fender Katsalidis, aims to address housing shortages in the inner city while incorporating sustainable design principles. The site falls within the Kurilpa Sustainable Growth Precinct, an area designated under temporary planning rules that encourage taller residential developments in exchange for compliance with specific design, sustainability, and landscaping standards. The proposed building is one storey shorter than the precinct's maximum allowed height of 30 storeys. The structure would rise from a site measuring just 20 metres in width, featuring a "slender tower" form approximately 12 metres wide throughout much of its height. This design is described as being influenced by the twisting vines of strangler fig trees, with the architects noting that the building's curved facade reflects this organic inspiration. The development would include 350 rooming accommodation units, alongside 413.8 square metres of commercial space suitable for shops, offices, cafes, or restaurants. At ground level, there would be 235.7 square metres of publicly accessible open space, including an arcade extending from Cordelia Street toward Manning Street. This space would be lined with commercial premises and serve as a point of access to the building. The proposal also includes 10 visitor car parks and 110 bicycle spaces, with no provision for resident vehicle parking. According to the planning assessment report prepared by Mewing Planning Consultants, the development is intended to provide affordable housing options for students and co-living arrangements near key amenities such as public transportation, educational institutions, and employment hubs. The report highlights that one-person dwellings make up roughly a quarter of all households in Brisbane, underscoring the need for flexible and cost-effective housing solutions. The proposal is framed as a response to the ongoing housing crisis, offering an innovative approach to increasing supply in a densely populated urban environment. A flood risk assessment included with the application indicates that the building would follow a flood emergency management plan. Residents would either be evacuated early or instructed to remain in place during major flood events. The planning report also mentions that the site is located within an industrial amenity investigation area due to its proximity to the Visy Glass facility. A larger 7.1-hectare block adjacent to the site is projected to accommodate over 4000 residences in the future. Because the proposal aligns with the height and landscaping criteria set by the Kurilpa temporary planning framework, it bypassed the requirement for public notification. The Brisbane City Council will review the application and determine whether it should proceed. The approval process will likely involve further scrutiny of environmental impact assessments, community feedback, and adherence to local zoning regulations. The development represents a notable step in the city's efforts to expand housing stock while integrating green architecture and public accessibility into urban planning.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 809/1/2026
Strangler fig-inspired high-rise planned for South Brisbane

A residential tower inspired by strangler fig trees has been proposed for a South Brisbane site, aiming to increase housing supply in the inner city. Developers, Milton 1, have applied to redevelop a private car park into a 29-story building with 350 rooming accommodations, commercial spaces, and public amenities. The project falls under the Kurilpa Sustainable Growth Precinct, allowing taller buildings in exchange for sustainability and design standards. The design features a narrow, 'slender tower' form with a curved facade inspired by plant vines. The development includes public open space, bike facilities, and minimal car parking, reflecting a focus on affordability and urban integration.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the development proposal as a neutral initiative aimed at addressing housing shortages, focusing on technical aspects like design, zoning, and sustainability. While housing policy is politically sensitive, the framing remains balanced, avoiding overt advocacy for either side. It

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the details of the proposed development including the location, the developer, the type of accommodation, and the design inspiration. It references the planning consultants and the council's temporary planning rules. While the text cuts off mid-sentence, the informatio

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting facts without apparent bias. The article focuses on the development's features and intentions without overtly promoting or criticizing the project. However, there is a slight tendency to present the development's benefits without counterpoints.

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 809/1/2026
Strangler fig-inspired high-rise planned for South Brisbane

A proposed residential tower in South Brisbane, inspired by strangler fig tree vines, aims to provide 350 rooming accommodations and commercial spaces. Developed by Milton 1 and designed by Fender Katsalidis, the 29-story structure would occupy a narrow 20-meter-wide site and fall within the Kurilpa Sustainable Growth Precinct, which allows taller buildings under specific conditions. The development includes public open space, retail areas, and bike facilities but excludes resident car parking. The proposal seeks to address housing shortages by offering affordable options near transit and services.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the development proposal as a neutral initiative aimed at addressing housing supply issues, citing official planning guidelines and developer claims. It does not overtly favor or criticize the development, nor does it emphasize ideological positions. The framing remains balanced

Why factuality (85): This article mirrors the first in content, providing the same factual information regarding the proposed development. It includes similar details about the location, the developer, the planning consultants, and the design elements. There is no significant deviation from the first article, maintainin

Why objectivity (80): Similar to the first article, this piece maintains a neutral tone. It presents the development's aspects without clear bias. However, like the first article, it appears to focus primarily on the positive aspects of the development without offering alternative viewpoints or criticisms.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories