UN: Expansion of settlements in West Bank undermines two-state solution

The United Nations has expressed deep concern over recent developments in the West Bank, particularly highlighting the expansion of Israeli settlements as undermining efforts toward a two-state solution. In a joint statement issued at the UN headquarters, five countries—Denmark, Greece, Latvia, the United Kingdom, and France—underscored their alarm about the deteriorating situation in the occupied Palestinian territories, including East Jerusalem. They emphasized that while global attention is focused on restoring peace in other parts of the Middle East, the international community must remain committed to implementing the peace plan and addressing the ongoing issues in the West Bank.

These nations referenced discussions within the Security Council regarding Resolution 2334, which explicitly condemns settlement activities in the occupied Palestinian territory and calls upon Israel to adhere to its obligations under international law. The statement criticized the Israeli government for continuing to consolidate control over the occupied Palestinian land, noting that these actions contradict both international law and Resolution 2334. It further warned that such measures undermine ongoing peace efforts in Gaza, the implementation of Resolution 2803, and the prospects for a two-state solution and regional security, including long-term Israeli security.

The statement strongly condemned the continued creation and expansion of Israeli settlements, as well as repeated acts of violence by settlers against Palestinian civilians. It called upon the Israeli government to halt the expansion of settlements and administrative powers, ensure accountability for settler violence, and investigate complaints against Israeli forces. Particular concern was raised about construction projects in the E1 area and the eviction order affecting the Khan Al-Ahmar community.

The E5 group warned that developing settlements in the E1 region would divide the West Bank, further isolate East Jerusalem, and represent a deliberate and immediate attack on the viability and continuity of an independent and sovereign Palestinian state. Such actions were deemed a clear violation of international law and posed unprecedented risks of annexation and forced displacement, which the countries firmly oppose. They also stressed that no entities should submit bids for construction contracts in E1 or other settlement expansions, emphasizing the legal and reputational consequences for those involved.

The countries rejected all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character, and status of the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem. They underscored the importance of maintaining and respecting the historical status quo of the Holy Sites in Jerusalem. They condemned repeated violations of this status quo, warning that these actions pose a threat to regional stability.

Reiterating their call for the immediate resumption of tax revenues owed by Israel to the Palestinian Authority, they noted that these funds must be transferred according to the Paris Protocol and are essential for providing basic services to the Palestinian population and enabling necessary reforms by the Palestinian Authority. They also emphasized the critical importance of allowing the UN, including UNRWA, and international NGOs to operate safely and extensively throughout the entire occupied Palestinian territory in accordance with international humanitarian law.

Regarding UNRWA, the E5 characterized the illegal demolition of its headquarters in East Jerusalem as an unprecedented action against a UN organization, noting that it undermines UNRWA's ability to provide essential services to Palestinians as mandated. They welcomed the advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice in October 2025 and urged Israel to fully comply with its international law obligations.

In conclusion, Denmark, Greece, Latvia, the United Kingdom, and France reaffirmed their unwavering commitment to the two-state solution, aligning with relevant UN resolutions and the New York Declaration. They emphasized the importance of unifying the Gaza Strip with the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, under Palestinian authority and stressed the need for a political process aimed at achieving a just and lasting resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, where Israelis and Palestinians can live in peace, security, and dignity.