In a significant diplomatic development, the United States has officially released the text of an agreement signed with Iran, which had previously been leaked to the media. The document, known as the "Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran," outlines terms aimed at halting hostilities and initiating further negotiations. This revelation comes after several days of intense discussions and speculation surrounding the nature of the deal. According to reports from American media outlets such as CNN and ABC News, the memorandum was disclosed on the evening of June 17 by a senior official within the Trump administration. While the full text of the agreement has yet to be published on official government websites, the transcript of the document was read aloud during the announcement.
The memorandum contains 14 points and addresses a range of issues related to regional stability and international relations. It emphasizes the cessation of hostilities on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and commits both parties to refrain from launching operations against each other and to avoid threats. A final agreement on the complete cessation of hostilities is expected to be formalized in the coming months. Both nations have pledged to respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity and to avoid interference in one another’s internal affairs. The sides also agree to continue negotiations and aim to reach a final agreement within 60 days, with the possibility of extending this period by mutual consent.
Under the terms of the memorandum, the United States promises to lift its maritime blockade against Iran immediately upon signing the document and to fully remove it within 30 days. Additionally, the U.S. intends to withdraw forces from Iranian borders within 30 days following the final agreement. In return, Iran commits to ensuring the free passage of commercial vessels through the Strait of Hormuz without blockades for a period of 60 days, acknowledging that approximately 30 days will be required to address technical and military obstacles and demining efforts.
The United States and its regional partners are tasked with developing a plan worth at least $300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of Iran, with the mechanism for this support to be finalized as part of the final agreement. All sanctions imposed on Iran by the U.S., including those under UN Security Council resolutions, are set to be lifted. Point eight specifically obliges Iran not to develop nuclear weapons and to resolve the issue of existing enriched uranium under a mechanism to be agreed upon, monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Until the final agreement is reached, both sides commit to maintaining the current status quo: Iran will maintain its current nuclear program status, while the U.S. will refrain from imposing new sanctions or deploying additional forces in the region. From the time of the memorandum's signing until the official lifting of sanctions, the U.S. will provide exemptions for the export of Iranian oil and petroleum products and related services, including banking transactions, insurance, and transportation. After implementing the memorandum, the U.S. pledges to unfreeze Iran's funds and assets, with specific procedures to be agreed upon during subsequent negotiations.
The memorandum includes provisions for the establishment of an enforcement mechanism to monitor compliance with the agreement and the implementation of conditions in future final agreements. The final agreement is expected to be codified through a binding resolution by the UN Security Council. These detailed commitments reflect the complex and multifaceted nature of the negotiations, highlighting the delicate balance sought between immediate de-escalation and long-term strategic considerations.
The talks between the delegations of the United States and Iran in Switzerland were anticipated to last throughout the night, according to reports from Associated Press citing sources and Iranian media. The negotiations began intensely on Sunday, amid tensions sparked by President Donald Trump's warnings and Iran's response. The situation was complicated by social media posts and media coverage, which challenged the efforts of U.S. Vice President Mike Pence and mediators Pakistan and Qatar to keep Iran engaged in talks addressing critical issues such as Iran's nuclear program, the Strait of Hormuz, and the unfreezing of billions of dollars in Iranian assets.
Iran particularly wanted to discuss the situation in Lebanon, where Israeli forces are conducting operations against the Iran-backed group Hezbollah, as the agreement stipulates the cessation of hostilities on all fronts. Iranian state media reported that the negotiations entered a "difficult phase" and were interrupted after the publication of an offensive statement by the U.S. president. Following this, the Iranian delegation met with Qatari mediators and left the negotiation site.
Vice President Pence and U.S. negotiators, including Steve Witko and Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law, held meetings with Kaliba and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, lasting about 80 minutes, according to Iranian media. It remained unclear when they could meet again. A high-ranking American diplomat participating in the negotiations stated that participants prepared to work through the night, emphasizing the intensity of the discussions. Topics included clarifying what Iran meant by recent statements regarding the Strait of Hormuz, mechanisms to ensure openness of the strait and adherence to a ceasefire in southern Lebanon, and intensive discussions on the nuclear issue.
Prior to these developments, Vice President Pence announced that significant progress had been made in the negotiations in Switzerland over the past hours. It is recalled that the first round of technical talks on the final peace agreement was scheduled for Friday but was canceled at the last minute, possibly due to renewed clashes between Israel and the Iran-backed group Hezbollah based in Lebanese territory. On June 17, the United States and Iran distantly signed a memorandum concerning the cessation of war and the opening of the Strait of Hormuz, serving as the foundation for working out the details of a comprehensive agreement to secure a ceasefire over the next 60 days.
The ongoing negotiations highlight the fragile nature of the relationship between the two countries, marked by periodic escalations and de-escalations. President Trump's recent threats have added layers of complexity, with his comments reportedly causing Iranian officials to reconsider their participation in the talks. Despite these challenges, both sides remain committed to finding a resolution that addresses their respective concerns and contributes to regional stability. As the process continues, the world watches closely to see how these developments might shape the geopolitical landscape in the Middle East.
5 reports
UNIANParty-alignedConservativeFactual 90Objective 8022 days ago Trump's team has started talking about peace with Iran soon, but threatened the "military option"Pentagon Chief Pete Hegseth stated during an interview with CBS 'Face the Nation' that the US and Iran are close to signing a peace agreement, which could lead to the unblocking of the Strait of Hormuz. He emphasized that the US demands Iran abandon its nuclear program entirely and stop supporting Hezbollah attacks against Israel. Hegset also mentioned that President Trump has made it clear that Iran will never possess nuclear weapons and that financial support will only be provided once Iran fulfills its obligations.
Bias read (Conservative): The article presents the Pentagon's stance on potential negotiations with Iran through a framework emphasizing military readiness and strict conditions for any deal, including complete abandonment of Iran's nuclear program. The language used underscores a firm, uncompromising position aligned with a
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): This article presents an official document text and aligns with other reports about the agreement. It remains neutral in tone, though it highlights U.S. demands clearly. Consistent with cross-source reporting.
Ukrainska PravdaIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 7519 days ago In the US, the official text of the Iran deal, which was previously "leaked" to the media, was revealedThe United States has released the official text of an agreement with Iran, which outlines a ceasefire and further negotiations. The document, titled 'Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran,' was disclosed by a senior administration official but has not yet been published on official websites. The agreement includes commitments to cease hostilities on all fronts, respect each other's sovereignty, avoid interference in internal affairs, and continue negotiations for a final deal within 60 days. The U.S. also pledged to lift its maritime
Bias read (Center): The article presents the official disclosure of an agreement between the U.S. and Iran without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the content of the agreement neutrally, citing multiple American media outlets and focusing on factual details such as the terms of the memorandum and the lackof
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 75): Reports on negotiations and mentions ZMІ sources, providing context about the night-long talks. Slightly biased toward the challenges faced by U.S. diplomats, but overall factually consistent with other accounts.
Ukrainska PravdaIndependentCenterFactual 87Objective 7014 days ago US-Iranian talks could last through the night MediaU.S.-Iran talks in Switzerland have entered a complex phase, with negotiations expected to continue into the night after intense discussions began on Sunday. The talks aim to reach an interim agreement to halt hostilities, addressing issues such as Iran's nuclear program, the Strait of Hormuz, and unfrozen Iranian assets worth billions of dollars. However, tensions arose after U.S. President Donald Trump issued threatening remarks, which reportedly led to an Iranian delegation meeting with Qatari mediators before leaving the negotiation site. U.S. Vice President Mike Pence and other negotiators met with Iranian officials, including Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, for around 80 minutes. Discussions focused on clarifying Iran's recent statements regarding the Strait of Hormuz, mechanisms to ensure openness of the strait, adherence to a ceasefire in southern Lebanon, and intensive debates over Iran's nuclear issue. Earlier this week, the first round of technical talks was canceled due to renewed clashes between Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the ongoing U.S.-Iran negotiations, citing multiple sources including Associated Press and Iranian state media. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. Instead, it provides a factual overview of the situation, the
Why these scores (Factual 87 · Objective 70): Discusses the fragile nature of the deal and cites Bloomberg. While informative, it leans slightly towards critical analysis of Trump’s approach, showing some editorializing despite being based on reported consensus.
Ukrainska PravdaIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 7015 days ago Trump's threats to Iran have wreaked havoc on the delicate negotiating process CNN CNNThe article discusses how U.S. President Donald Trump's threatening rhetoric towards Iran has disrupted delicate diplomatic negotiations between the two countries. According to CNN, Trump's comments came after Vice President Mike Pence announced a 'diplomatic mission' aimed at improving relations with Iran. However, Trump's threats of renewed attacks against Iran were seen as highly undiplomatic and caused Iranian representatives to reject four-party talks involving the U.S., Pakistan, and Qatar. Despite this, private negotiations continue in an attempt to bring both sides back to the negotiating table. The situation has escalated tensions further, with Iran warning that its military is prepared to respond to any aggression. Trump has previously threatened Iran over its support for Hezbollah in Lebanon and over the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Trump's actions as disruptive and undiplomatic while emphasizing his aggressive rhetoric toward Iran. It highlights Iran's rejection of negotiations due to Trump's threats but does not provide balanced counterpoints or contextualize Iran's own actions or motivations. The tone is l
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article reports on Tрамп’s threats and their impact on negotiations, citing sources like CNN and Iranian representatives. It provides details from multiple sides but includes some emotionally charged language when describing the Iranian response. Factually aligned with cross-source consensus.
UNIANParty-alignedCenter21 days ago Frail agreement with Iran: Trump left complex issues for later, - BloombergThe article reports on preliminary agreements between the US and Iran following over two months of tense negotiations, including a temporary ceasefire and resumption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. However, key disputes remain unresolved, such as Iran's nuclear program, sanctions, and regional security issues. The agreement includes a 60-day period for further discussions, with an official memorandum expected to be signed on June 19. Experts warn that this phase represents the most challenging part of the process due to lingering distrust and unresolved economic and strategic issues.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of the situation without overtly favoring either side. It highlights both the progress made and the remaining challenges, citing expert opinions and official details without apparent ideological framing.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter