UN: Expansion of settlements in West Bank undermines two-state solution

The United Nations has expressed deep concern over recent developments on the West Bank, particularly highlighting the expansion of Israeli settlements as undermining efforts toward a two-state solution. In a joint statement issued at the UN headquarters, five countries—Denmark, Greece, Latvia, the United Kingdom, and France—underscored their alarm about the deteriorating situation in the occupied Palestinian territories, including East Jerusalem. They emphasized that while global attention remains focused on restoring peace in other parts of the Middle East, the international community must continue to prioritize the implementation of the peace plan and monitor developments on the West Bank.

The statement referenced discussions within the Security Council regarding Resolution 2334, which explicitly condemns settlement activities in the occupied Palestinian territory and calls on Israel to respect its obligations under international law. The five nations noted that the Israeli government continues to consolidate control over the occupied Palestinian land, actions they claim violate both international law and Resolution 2334. These measures, according to the statement, undermine ongoing peace efforts in Gaza, the application of Resolution 2803, and the prospects for a two-state solution and regional security, including long-term Israeli security.

The countries strongly condemned the continued creation and expansion of Israeli settlements, as well as repeated acts of violence by settlers against Palestinian civilians. They called on the Israeli government to halt the expansion of settlements and administrative powers, ensure accountability for settler violence, and investigate complaints against Israeli forces. Particular concern was expressed over construction projects by Israel in the E1 area and the eviction order affecting the Khan al-Ahmar community.

The E5 warned that developing settlements in the E1 region would divide the West Bank further, isolate East Jerusalem even more, and represent a deliberate and direct attack on the viability and continuity of an independent and sovereign Palestinian state. Such actions were deemed a clear violation of international law and would create unprecedented risks of annexation and forced displacement, which the countries firmly oppose. They also stressed that these operations should not proceed with tenders for construction contracts in E1 or other settlement expansions, emphasizing the legal and reputational consequences for those involved.

The five nations rejected all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character, and status of the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, and underscored the importance of maintaining and respecting the historical status quo of the Holy Sites in Jerusalem. They condemned repeated violations of this status quo, warning that such actions pose a threat to regional stability.

Reiterating their call for the immediate resumption of tax revenues owed by Israel to the Palestinian Authority, the E5 noted that these funds must be transferred in accordance with the Paris Protocol and are essential for providing basic services to the Palestinian population and implementing reforms by the Palestinian Authority. They also emphasized the critical need for Israel to allow the UN, including UNRWA, and international NGOs to operate safely and on a large scale throughout the entire occupied Palestinian territory, in compliance with international humanitarian law.

Regarding UNRWA, the E5 criticized the illegal demolition of its headquarters in East Jerusalem. This act, they argued, undermines the organization's ability to provide crucial humanitarian aid to Palestinians and further complicates the already fragile situation on the ground. The destruction of UNRWA’s infrastructure not only hampers relief efforts but also signals a broader disregard for international norms and cooperation.

The joint statement reflects a unified stance among these European nations, highlighting their commitment to upholding international law and supporting peaceful resolutions to the conflict. Their concerns extend beyond the immediate impact of settlement expansions to include the broader implications for regional stability, the rights of the Palestinian people, and the role of international institutions in facilitating a just and lasting peace. As tensions continue to rise, the international community faces mounting pressure to address these issues effectively and prevent further escalation.