Stephen A. Smith heaps praise on Rubio, Vance and DeSantis
Stephen A. Smith, a prominent ESPN and SiriusXM personality, praised Republican politicians Marco Rubio, JD Vance, and Ron DeSantis in a recent interview, highlighting their qualifications and political acumen. Smith described Rubio as 'the real deal,' emphasizing his background as a former senator, bilingual skills, and Cuban heritage, suggesting he could be a strong candidate for the 2028 presidential election. He also commended Vance for his sharpness and comfort on camera and acknowledged DeSantis's effectiveness as a governor, despite policy differences. Smith has previously expressed support for Rubio, defending him against Democratic criticisms and predicting that a Vance-Rubio ticket would be difficult for any Democrat to defeat in 2028. However, Smith has ruled out running for president himself, stating he prefers to maintain his broadcasting career.
Ben Shapiro, a prominent conservative commentator, has warned that a potential 2028 presidential race between Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance might ultimately harm Rubio’s political prospects. This assessment comes amid growing speculation about a possible matchup between the two figures, which has sparked debate among analysts and commentators. In a recent podcast interview with host Patrick Bet-David, released on Wednesday, Shapiro expressed skepticism about whether Rubio would pursue the presidency, pointing to the secretary’s past decisions and public statements as indicators of caution. Shapiro’s remarks follow a wave of positive commentary directed toward Rubio and Vance from another high-profile media figure, ESPN and SiriusXM personality Stephen A. Smith. During a segment of his show “Straight Shooter with Stephen A,” which gained traction on social media platforms, Smith praised Rubio extensively, describing him as “the real deal” and emphasizing his impressive qualifications. Smith highlighted Rubio’s background as a former U.S. Senator, his current role as secretary of state, and his fluency in Spanish and heritage as a Cuban-American, all of which he argued make Rubio a credible candidate for the presidency in 2028. In the same clip, Smith also commended Vice President JD Vance for his sharp intellect and comfort in front of cameras, suggesting that Vance could be a compelling opponent or running mate for Rubio. Additionally, Smith acknowledged Florida Governor Ron DeSantis as a capable leader, despite policy differences, noting that he does not perceive widespread dissatisfaction with Florida’s governance under DeSantis’s leadership. Smith’s comments align with his broader political stance, which includes a shift away from previous support for Democratic candidates. Earlier this year, he admitted regret over his decision to vote for Kamala Harris in the 2020 election. On a February appearance on Dave Rubin’s show, Smith contrasted Vance with Rubio, stating that he viewed Vance as someone who leans into populist rhetoric rather than focusing on practical governance. However, Smith had previously predicted that a hypothetical Vance-Rubio ticket would pose a formidable challenge to any Democratic candidate in the 2028 elections. Despite his admiration for Rubio, Smith has ruled out a presidential campaign of his own, explaining during an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity that he prefers to maintain his career in broadcasting. Instead, he has publicly endorsed Democratic governors Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania and Wes Moore of Maryland as potential candidates for the 2028 election. While Smith’s remarks have been widely shared online, The Washington Times was unable to independently verify the specifics of his comments beyond the video clip that circulated. Nonetheless, the sentiment expressed by Smith reflects a broader trend of optimism surrounding Rubio’s political future, particularly within conservative circles. Rubio’s potential candidacy for president in 2028 has drawn considerable attention, especially given his experience in national politics and his position as secretary of state. His background as a Cuban-American and his multilingual abilities have positioned him as a unique figure in the Republican Party, potentially appealing to diverse constituencies. Meanwhile, Vance, as vice president, has emerged as a rising star within the party, known for his intellectual demeanor and strategic communication skills. As discussions around the 2028 election continue to evolve, the dynamics between Rubio and Vance will likely remain a focal point for analysts and voters alike. Their respective strengths and weaknesses, along with their ability to navigate the complex landscape of modern American politics, will play a crucial role in shaping the trajectory of the upcoming presidential race.
Go to the primary sources (2)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Stephen A. Smith, a prominent ESPN and SiriusXM personality, praised Republican politicians Marco Rubio, JD Vance, and Ron DeSantis in a recent interview, highlighting their qualifications and political acumen. Smith described Rubio as 'the real deal,' emphasizing his background as a former senator, bilingual skills, and Cuban heritage, suggesting he could be a strong candidate for the 2028 presidential election. He also commended Vance for his sharpness and comfort on camera and acknowledged DeSantis's effectiveness as a governor, despite policy differences. Smith has previously expressed support for Rubio, defending him against Democratic criticisms and predicting that a Vance-Rubio ticket would be difficult for any Democrat to defeat in 2028. However, Smith has ruled out running for president himself, stating he prefers to maintain his broadcasting career.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Stephen A. Smith's praise for several Republican figures but does not exhibit overtly biased language or one-sided sourcing. It includes quotes from Smith and references his past statements, providing a balanced view of his opinions without editorializing or favoring one side.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately summarizes Stephen A. Smith's praise for Rubio, Vance, and DeSantis based on a clip of his show, which matches the primary source document. It also mentions Smith's previous statements about the 2028 election, showing consistency with the original report. No significant factua
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting Smith's comments without overtly endorsing or criticizing any political figure. It provides context about Smith's past views and includes quotes without apparent bias, maintaining a balanced perspective.
The HillIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 608/15/2026
Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro warns that a potential 2028 presidential race between Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance could lead to negative outcomes for Rubio. In a podcast interview with Patrick Bet-David, Shapiro questions whether Rubio would realistically run for president, pointing to his past experiences and challenges. The discussion highlights concerns about Rubio's viability in a competitive political landscape, particularly against a rising figure like Vance. While the article does not confirm any specific plans from either candidate, it suggests that such a matchup could create significant political tension.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the potential candidacy of Marco Rubio through the lens of a conservative commentator expressing skepticism about his chances. This perspective leans left by questioning the feasibility of a prominent Republican figure's campaign, implying potential shortcomings in his political '
Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports that Ben Shapiro warned about a potential 2028 presidential contest between Marco Rubio and JD Vance, aligning with the primary source document where Stephen A. Smith discusses the likelihood of a Democratic candidate losing to a Vance-Rubio ticket. However, it does no
Why objectivity (60): The article presents Shapiro's warning as a cautionary note but frames it in a somewhat critical light toward Rubio, implying potential failure. While it remains within journalistic bounds, the tone leans slightly toward skepticism about Rubio's viability, which may reflect a bias rather than pure n
The HillIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 558/10/2026
As Donald Trump's presidency enters its final phase, Republican candidate JD Vance and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris are both emphasizing their roles as populist outsiders ahead of the 2028 election. Both figures are attempting to frame themselves as alternatives to the establishment within their parties, though they face internal criticism. This positioning reflects broader trends in U.S. politics where candidates seek to appeal to voters disillusioned with traditional political structures. The strategies of Vance and Harris highlight the competitive nature of upcoming elections and the challenges candidates face in balancing party loyalty with appeals to broader constituencies.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both Vance and Harris as populist outsiders without overtly favoring one over the other. It does not use biased language or selectively present information to support one candidate’s position over the other. The framing remains balanced, focusing on their shared strategy rather
Why factuality (60): The article mentions JD Vance and Kamala Harris positioning themselves as populists for 2028, but it lacks specific details or sources to substantiate these claims. It references internal criticism from within their parties, but does not provide evidence or quotes to support this assertion. The lack
Why objectivity (55): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, focusing on the strategic moves of candidates rather than taking sides. However, it uses terms like 'battle to define outsider personas' which could imply a competitive or adversarial dynamic without providing enough context to determine if this is a
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
United States
