ON
← Back to feed
Stellar eruptions in the laboratory: First experimental evidence for their suppression in strong magnetic fields
United Kingdom🔬 Science2 days ago

Stellar eruptions in the laboratory: First experimental evidence for their suppression in strong magnetic fields

An international team of researchers has conducted laboratory experiments that provide the first experimental evidence showing that strong magnetic fields can suppress coronal mass ejections (CMEs), which are massive plasma eruptions from stars. Using high-energy lasers and plasma simulations, the team recreated conditions similar to those in stars and found that stronger magnetic fields prevent these eruptions from escaping into space. This finding helps explain why CMEs are rare on most stars compared to the Sun. The study, published in *Physical Review Letters*, highlights the role of magnetic fields in controlling stellar activity and could improve our understanding of stellar evolution and planetary space weather.

An international team of astrophysicists and plasma physicists has achieved the first experimental confirmation that strong magnetic fields can entirely suppress coronal mass ejections (CMEs), offering new insights into why such eruptions are rare on stars beyond the Sun. The breakthrough, detailed in a study published in Physical Review Letters, was made using laboratory experiments that recreated stellar eruptions under controlled conditions. The experiments were conducted at the Ecole Polytechnique in France, where researchers used high-energy lasers to generate plasma flows mimicking the core of solar CMEs. By applying varying levels of magnetic fields, the team observed how these fields influenced the behavior of the plasma. Under weaker magnetic fields, the plasma expanded and moved outward as expected. But with stronger magnetic fields, the flow became unstable, fragmented, and eventually stopped. This demonstrated that intense magnetic fields could act as a barrier, preventing CMEs from escaping into space. Julián D. Alvarado-Gomez, a senior scientist at the Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam, played a key role in connecting the laboratory findings to real-world stellar environments. He explained that the combination of theoretical models, experimental data, and numerical simulations allowed the team to validate a longstanding hypothesis, that magnetic fields on active stars might prevent CMEs from occurring or escaping. Julien Fuchs, who led the experimental work, noted that the results were unexpected yet crucial. “When we increased the magnetic field strength and saw the change in behavior of the propagating plasma, it was a clear sign that something fundamental was happening,” he said. The experiments revealed that the interaction between the expanding plasma and the magnetic field could lead to a phenomenon known as kink instability, where the flow bends and reverses direction. The kink instability occurs when the external magnetic field becomes strong enough to exert a dominant force on the plasma. This causes the flow to lose its forward motion and either collapse back onto itself or remain confined within the magnetic structure. The discovery suggests that many CMEs on active stars may not reach space at all, being instead trapped by the surrounding magnetic field. This would explain why such eruptions are rarely observed on stars other than the Sun. The implications extend beyond understanding stellar activity. The study highlights the potential impact of magnetic suppression on exoplanets. CMEs are among the most energetic phenomena in space, capable of stripping planetary atmospheres or altering their chemical composition. If many CMEs are prevented from escaping due to strong magnetic fields, some exoplanets may experience a more stable and less hostile space environment. This could improve their chances of maintaining atmospheres over geological timescales, potentially enhancing their habitability. The research marks a significant step in bridging laboratory physics with astrophysical observations. By replicating stellar processes in a controlled setting, scientists have gained valuable insight into mechanisms that shape the behavior of stars and their planetary systems. Future studies will likely focus on refining the models and exploring how variations in magnetic field strength affect different types of stellar eruptions.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Phys.org logoPhys.orgIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 882 days ago
Stellar eruptions in the laboratory: First experimental evidence for their suppression in strong magnetic fields

An international team of researchers has conducted laboratory experiments that provide the first experimental evidence showing that strong magnetic fields can suppress coronal mass ejections (CMEs), which are massive plasma eruptions from stars. Using high-energy lasers and plasma simulations, the team recreated conditions similar to those in stars and found that stronger magnetic fields prevent these eruptions from escaping into space. This finding helps explain why CMEs are rare on most stars compared to the Sun. The study, published in *Physical Review Letters*, highlights the role of magnetic fields in controlling stellar activity and could improve our understanding of stellar evolution and planetary space weather.

Bias read (Center): The article presents scientific findings without political implications. It focuses on astrophysical phenomena and does not take a stance on any political issue. The framing remains neutral, relying on empirical data and expert commentary without ideological bias.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately summarizes the primary source document, mentioning the combination of astrophysical simulations, laser-plasma experiments, and 3D modeling used to test the hypothesis about stellar magnetic fields suppressing CMEs. It correctly references the key findings such as the suppressi

Why objectivity (88): The article presents the findings in a neutral tone, explaining the significance of the research without overt bias. However, it includes quotes from researchers, which may slightly influence perceived objectivity, though not to an extreme degree.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories