ON
← Back to feed
State took land but didn't pay compensation for 50 years; Andhra Pradesh HC orders payment
India🏛️ PoliticsProgressive3 hr. ago

State took land but didn't pay compensation for 50 years; Andhra Pradesh HC orders payment

The Andhra Pradesh High Court ordered the state government to pay land compensation to a 72-year-old woman, Kunisetty Hymavathy, which was awarded in 1976 but never delivered. The court ruled that while the 2013 Land Acquisition Act does not allow reopening cases under the old 1894 Act, the state has a duty to ensure compensation is paid promptly. The petitioner discovered the land had been acquired decades earlier and compensation had been deposited with the state's revenue department. The court emphasized that fair compensation is a constitutional requirement and that failure to deliver it constitutes a breach of Article 300-A.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentProgressive3 hr. ago
State took land but didn't pay compensation for 50 years; Andhra Pradesh HC orders payment

The Andhra Pradesh High Court ordered the state government to pay land compensation to a 72-year-old woman, Kunisetty Hymavathy, which was awarded in 1976 but never delivered. The court ruled that while the 2013 Land Acquisition Act does not allow reopening cases under the old 1894 Act, the state has a duty to ensure compensation is paid promptly. The petitioner discovered the land had been acquired decades earlier and compensation had been deposited with the state's revenue department. The court emphasized that fair compensation is a constitutional requirement and that failure to deliver it constitutes a breach of Article 300-A.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a failure of governmental accountability and highlights the constitutional obligation to provide timely compensation. While the legal framework is discussed objectively, the emphasis on the state's 'constitutional and statutory responsibility' and the critique of the

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories