Starmer on the brink: PM and Burnham ‘working towards’ handover in September
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is reportedly considering stepping down as leader of the Labour Party, with discussions underway about handing over the leadership to Andy Burnham, the former mayor of Greater Manchester. Sources indicate that a potential transition could occur as early as mid-July or by September, depending on internal negotiations. This comes after Burnham's strong performance in the Makerfield by-election, where he defeated Reform UK candidate Richard Tice. Some Labour MPs have expressed concerns about prolonged uncertainty under Starmer’s current leadership, while Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper has reportedly urged him to step down. US President Donald Trump has also commented on the situation, stating that Starmer 'will resign' due to failures on immigration and energy policies. Starmer has remained largely silent on the issue, though Tech Secretary Peter Kyle confirmed he is considering resigning and is consulting with advisors.
Andy Burnham, the newly elected Labour MP for Makerfield, faces mounting pressure from within his party and beyond to avoid appointing Ed Miliband as Chancellor. The concerns stem from fears that Miliband's left-leaning policies—particularly his aggressive stance on climate action and taxation—could destabilize the economy and alienate both business leaders and financial markets. This growing unease has prompted senior figures from the business sector, alongside some Labour MPs, to publicly voice their apprehensions. The controversy began following reports that Burnham, who is poised to become the next Prime Minister, is weighing between appointing Miliband or Wes Streeting as his potential Chancellor. While Miliband, once a prominent figure in Labour politics, is seen as a staunch advocate for ambitious environmental targets and higher taxation, his approach has drawn criticism for its perceived negative impact on economic stability. Business leaders argue that Miliband's policies, particularly his focus on Net Zero initiatives, could lead to increased costs for consumers and businesses alike, potentially triggering inflationary pressures and undermining confidence in the economy. Sir Rocco Forte, a hotelier and prominent businessman, expressed deep concern over the prospect of Miliband taking charge of the economy. He warned that Miliband's ideology, characterized by high taxation and anti-enterprise sentiment, could hinder economic growth and deter investment. Similarly, Hugh Osmond, a former entrepreneur, highlighted how Miliband's policies could exacerbate existing challenges in labor and energy sectors, areas where current Chancellor Rachel Reeves has attempted to maintain balance. Meanwhile, the debate surrounding Burnham's choice has intensified as he prepares to outline his economic vision in a significant speech. This speech, expected to occur shortly, aims to reassure investors and the public that Burnham will adhere to fiscal discipline and prioritize economic stability. However, the lack of clarity regarding his preferred Chancellor has raised eyebrows among political analysts and market observers. Lucy Powell, Labour's deputy leader and a close associate of Miliband, has publicly endorsed the idea of Miliband serving as Chancellor. She argued that Miliband possesses the necessary skills to challenge traditional economic norms and implement bold reforms. Despite this support, some within Burnham's inner circle remain skeptical, noting that such a move could risk alienating key stakeholders, including the business community and financial institutions. As the situation unfolds, the broader implications of Burnham's decision extend beyond immediate economic concerns. It reflects deeper ideological divides within the Labour Party and highlights the delicate balance required to navigate the complex landscape of modern British politics. With the upcoming leadership transition and the potential reshaping of economic priorities, the outcome of Burnham's choice will undoubtedly influence the trajectory of the nation's economic strategy in the coming years.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
The article presents a poll asking whether Andy Burnham would make a better Prime Minister than Keir Starmer. It includes user comments but does not provide specific data or analysis regarding the poll results.
Bias read (Center): The article frames a question about leadership potential without taking a stance or providing biased information. It simply presents a poll question and allows reader comments, which are noted as unmoderated and not reflecting the publication's views.
Why these scores (Factual 100 · Objective 100): The article is unrelated to the RSA employment tribunal event, discussing a completely different topic about Andy Burnham and Keir Starmer. Since it doesn't address the event at all, both scores are 100 by default.
iNewsIndependentCenterFactual 100Objective 9023 days ago
Andy Burnham's recent by-election win positions him as a potential future prime minister. The article outlines Burnham's potential policies, including his stance on taxation, which aligns with Labour's 2024 manifesto commitment to avoid increasing major taxes. However, Burnham has previously suggested reconsidering the 50p top rate of income tax, indicating a shift in his position.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Burnham's policy positions without overtly favoring one side. It includes direct quotes from Burnham and references his past statements, providing a balanced overview of his potential approach as PM. There is no clear ideological slant in the framing or sourcing.
Why these scores (Factual 100 · Objective 90): The article clearly corrects a false claim by Reform UK and provides accurate details about the by-election results. It maintains a strictly factual and neutral tone.
The IndependentIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 9024 days ago
Labour's Andy Burnham won a significant majority in the Makerfield by-election following the resignation of Josh Simons. Burnham described the result as a 'turning point' and emphasized the need for change in British politics. He expressed pride in the community's response and stated that the victory would serve as a foundation for future efforts.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents Burnham's speech emphasizing change, hope, and criticism of current politics, which aligns with progressive themes. While the article itself is neutral in tone, the framing of Burnham's remarks and the emphasis on his call for transformation suggest a left-leaning perspective.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): The article provides a direct transcript of Andy Burnham's speech following his by-election victory, accurately reporting his statements and the context of his potential leadership challenge. The tone remains neutral and factual, presenting events without bias or editorializing.
BBC News (UK)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 9024 days ago
Professor Sir John Curtice analyzes Andy Burnham's unexpected victory in the Makerfield by-election, noting that Labour's performance was significantly better than expected despite recent declines in national polling. He highlights Burnham's personal appeal and strategic campaigning as key factors in retaining Labour's support.
Bias read (Center): The article presents an analytical perspective from a respected academic without overtly favoring any political side. It focuses on statistical trends and electoral outcomes rather than making value judgments or using biased language. The framing remains neutral, emphasizing data and expert analysis
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): The article provides a detailed analysis of Burnham's victory, citing academic insights and polling data. It remains highly objective and factual throughout.
The EconomistIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 9024 days ago
The article reports two brief international updates: Keir Starmer's Labour Party candidate, Sir John Burnham, has won the Makerfield by-election in England, and US Vice President Kamala Harris's running mate, JD Vance, has postponed planned talks with Iran.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a neutral summary of two events without editorializing, biased language, or one-sided sourcing. It simply reports the outcomes of a UK by-election and a diplomatic postponement without taking a stance.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): The article accurately reports Burnham's by-election win alongside unrelated international news. It remains objective and factual in its reporting.
Novara MediaIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8524 days ago
Andy Burnham secured a decisive victory in the Makerfield byelection with 55% of the vote, defeating Reform UK candidate Robert Kenyon by over 9,000 votes. The article highlights Burnham's strong support in the area and critiques Conservative and Labour figures who attempted to downplay the significance of his win.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Burnham's victory as a 'huge personal mandate' and criticizes right-leaning figures like Mike Tapp and James Cleverly for attempting to minimize the result. It emphasizes Burnham's leadership potential and implies that the right is underestimating his influence, which aligns with左
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article accurately reports Burnham's victory and the reactions from various political figures. It emphasizes the significance of the result without overtly favoring any particular side, maintaining a balanced tone.
The IndependentIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8524 days ago
The by-election in Makerfield saw Labour candidate Andy Burnham win by over 9,000 votes, positioning him as a potential challenger to Prime Minister Keir Starmer for leadership of the Labour Party. International media, including the Wall Street Journal, highlighted the significance of the result, describing it as a potential source of further political instability in the UK.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the event factually without overtly favoring any side. It reports on the election outcome and quotes international media reactions neutrally, without using loaded language or emphasizing one perspective over another.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article accurately summarizes international media coverage of Burnham's victory. It presents the global reaction neutrally, focusing on the factual outcomes and international perspectives without taking sides.
BBC News (UK)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 8524 days ago
The article discusses Andy Burnham's potential challenge against Sir Keir Starmer for the Labour Party leadership following Burnham's victory in the Makerfield by-election. It outlines the circumstances surrounding Starmer's leadership, including poor performance in recent local elections and internal party pressure. The piece also touches on Starmer's controversial appointment of Lord Mandelson as UK ambassador to the US, which raised concerns due to Mandelson's ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the situation—Burnham's potential challenge and Starmer's position—without overtly favoring one over the other. It provides factual background on the reasons for the leadership challenge and includes details on both supporters and critics of Starmer. There is no明显的
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article provides accurate information about the process of challenging Starmer's leadership. It remains neutral in tone, explaining the procedures and possible outcomes without bias.
The Guardian (UK)IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8524 days ago
Andy Burnham's decisive victory in the Makerfield byelection has raised questions about his potential challenge to Keir Starmer's leadership within the Labour Party. Burnham, who previously served as mayor of Greater Manchester, described the win as the 'most consequential byelection of our lives' and suggested it could mark a turning point for both the constituency and the country. The high voter turnout of 58.75%, the largest for a byelection in seven years, was seen as a positive sign for Labour. Burnham secured 55% of the vote, while Reform candidate Robert Kenyon received 35%, with the新兴的
Bias read (Center): The article presents the outcome of the byelection without overtly favoring any particular side. It reports on Burnham's victory and its implications for Labour leader Keir Starmer, as well as Reform's performance, without using biased language or selectively emphasizing one perspective over another
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article accurately reports the election results and Burnham's statements. It maintains a balanced approach by discussing the implications of the result without overtly favoring any political stance.
Daily MailIndependentConservativeFactual 95Objective 8524 days ago
Labour faces potential internal conflict following Andy Burnham's by-election win in Makerfield. Some MPs and leadership rivals are urging Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to resign, citing his unpopularity and the need to prevent a divisive leadership contest. However, Starmer remains defiant, insisting he has the mandate to continue leading the country and may resist calls for him to step down.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the situation as a 'civil war' within Labour, emphasizing the pressure on Starmer to resign and portraying his refusal as defiance against his peers. The tone suggests skepticism toward Starmer’s continued leadership, using terms like 'embattled Prime Minister,' 'unpopular PM in历史
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article accurately describes the by-election and its implications. While it mentions speculation about Starmer's future, it maintains a relatively neutral tone compared to others.
BBC News (UK)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 8023 days ago
Following Andy Burnham's victory in the Makerfield by-election, Labour MPs are divided over the future of Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Some MPs criticize Starmer, claiming he has led the party into internal conflict, while others argue that Burnham is poised to become the next leader through an uncontested 'coronation' process. The article notes that Burnham could secure enough support from MPs to bypass a formal leadership contest, similar to Gordon Brown's ascension in 2007. However, Starmer has stated he will run in any leadership election, ensuring a vote by Labour members. This creates tension, as Starmer's position as both PM and Labour leader requires him to maintain parliamentary support.
Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives from Labour MPs, including criticism of Starmer and speculation about Burnham's potential leadership. It avoids overtly favoring one side, instead highlighting the internal divisions and possible outcomes without taking a stance on the validity of either.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 80): The article accurately summarizes the political reactions and provides balanced quotes from both sides. It maintains a neutral tone overall.
Middle East EyeIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8023 days ago
Andy Burnham, the former mayor of Greater Manchester and current MP for Makerfield, has emerged as the frontrunner to become Britain's next prime minister following his decisive victory in the by-election. His win, with 55% of the vote, significantly outperformed Reform UK, which secured 35%. This result challenges Reform UK's narrative that a Farage-led government is inevitable. The outcome could influence Labour's overall support, though predictions vary regarding the extent of the impact.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual results of the election and quotes varying opinions from pollsters without overtly favoring any side. It does not use loaded language or selectively omit context, maintaining a balanced tone.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 80): The article provides a comprehensive overview of Burnham's potential impact and policies. It maintains a balanced approach while presenting factual information.
The IndependentIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8024 days ago
Andy Burnham won the Makerfield by-election with a significant majority, securing over half the vote and surpassing Reform UK candidate Robert Kenyon by nearly 10,000 votes. This follows a shift in voter preferences observed during recent local elections where Nigel Farage's party gained ground. Burnham's victory marks his return to Parliament and positions him to potentially challenge Sir Keir Starmer for the Labour leadership. The results show Labour's increased vote share compared to previous years, while Reform UK also saw an increase in support, though some of its voters shifted to the新兴党
Bias read (Progressive): The article emphasizes Andy Burnham's 'historic' victory and frames it as a boost for Labour, highlighting the 'Burnham effect' and noting Labour's improved performance. It contrasts this with Reform UK's gains but presents them as less impactful, suggesting a positive outlook for Labour.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 80): The article provides detailed statistics and context about the election results, accurately reporting Burnham's vote share and Reform UK's performance. It remains relatively neutral in tone, focusing on presenting the facts rather than taking sides.
The Guardian (UK)IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 7523 days ago
Andy Burnham, the newly elected MP for Makerfield, secured a significant victory in the by-election with a majority of 9,231 votes, surpassing previous results and defeating Reform UK by over 20 percentage points. Despite the win, Burnham avoided direct confrontation with Labour leader Keir Starmer during his victory rally, choosing to leave quickly amid media questioning. His campaign manager, Louise Haigh, suggested that Starmer should consider stepping down due to the potential challenges of retaining leadership within the party. Burnham's strong performance has raised speculation about a possible leadership challenge against Starmer, though Burnham himself did not explicitly confirm this. Meanwhile, Starmer attempted to claim credit for the victory, emphasizing the defeat of Reform UK, but faced pressure from journalists suggesting his position as Labour leader is under threat.
Bias read (Center): The article provides balanced coverage of the event, presenting both Burnham's actions and Starmer's response without overtly favoring either side. It includes quotes from multiple figures, including Burnham's campaign manager and rival leadership contender Wes Streeting, offering a multi-perspectiv
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 75): The article provides detailed accounts of Burnham's actions and quotes from supporters. It maintains a relatively neutral tone but includes speculative elements about potential leadership challenges.
Daily MirrorIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 7023 days ago
In the Makerfield by-election, Andy Burnham secured a significant victory for Labour, defeating Reform and other parties with a majority of over 9,000 votes. This result strengthens Burnham's position within Labour and provides him with leverage in any potential leadership challenge against Keir Starmer. Despite Reform's influence in recent local elections, Burnham's win demonstrates Labour's resilience, particularly in areas previously captured by Reform. The outcome offers Labour MPs a renewed sense of optimism amid low national polling for the government. Meanwhile, the Prime Minister remains confident in his general election mandate and is preparing for possible leadership challenges. Internal discussions are ongoing within Labour about readiness for a potential leadership race, though consensus on timing remains elusive.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the electoral results and their implications for Labour's internal dynamics and the broader political landscape without overtly favoring any particular side. It includes perspectives from both Burnham's camp and the current government, providing balanced context on the situation
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports the election results and Burnham's strategic implications. It presents the situation fairly but slightly emphasizes Burnham's potential over other factors.
The Guardian (UK)IndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 9523 days ago
Andy Burnham, the former Greater Manchester mayor, secured a significant byelection victory in Makerfield, defeating Reform UK candidate Robert Kenyon with a 9,231-vote majority. This win marked a broader shift in voter behavior, as Burnham attracted support from across the political spectrum, including left, center, and even some right-wing voters. Labour captured 55% of the vote, while Reform UK received 35% and the hard-right Restore Britain got 7%. The Liberal Democrats and Greens saw their share of the vote drop dramatically, contributing to Burnham's success. Voters expressed concerns about the divisive nature of right-wing campaigns focused on immigration, which they felt alienated local communities. Some former Reform supporters, such as Joseph, a heavy goods driver, switched to Burnham, believing he offered the best chance to counter right-wing influence in the region.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the electoral outcome, highlighting support from multiple political factions without overtly favoring any side. It includes perspectives from various voters, including those from the left, center, and right, and does not exhibit strong ideological framing or o
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 95): Neutral reporting on the by-election process with factual details about polling locations, procedures, and candidates. No subjective commentary, maintaining high objectivity.
The Guardian (UK)IndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8520 days ago
Andy Burnham's potential selection of a chancellor has sparked internal divisions among his supporters, with Wes Streeting and Ed Miliband emerging as the leading candidates. Advocates for Streeting argue that his appointment would signal a more centrist approach, aimed at reassuring businesses and the fossil fuel sector. Supporters of Miliband believe he possesses the necessary experience and commitment to advance Burnham's progressive policies, such as nationalizing utilities. This debate highlights the broader question of Burnham's political direction should he become prime minister. While Miliband is seen as having strong ties to Burnham and a track record of implementing policies, concerns remain about his alignment with financial markets. Burnham has not yet made a decision on the chancellor role, with other potential candidates also under consideration.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives on the potential chancellor candidates without overtly favoring one side. It includes quotes from supporters of both Streeting and Miliband, highlighting their respective arguments and concerns. There is no clear bias toward either candidate or political stance
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Highly factual and balanced reporting on the division among Burnham's supporters regarding the chancellor selection. Accurately reflects the competing interests between Streeting and Miliband. Maintains neutrality in presenting both sides of the debate.
The IndependentIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8523 days ago
The Makerfield by-election in northern England saw a significant victory for Labour candidate Andy Burnham, who won 54.8% of the vote, securing a large majority over Reform UK's Robert Kenyon. This result came amid concerns that Labour might face a crisis after poor performance in recent local elections, particularly in Wigan, where Reform UK gained substantial ground. Burnham's win strengthens his position to challenge current Labour leader Keir Starmer for the party leadership. Voters in the area, such as Terry Miller, believe Burnham represents a return to Labour's traditional values and argue that the party has drifted too close to the Conservatives in recent years.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the election outcome and voter perspectives neutrally, quoting both supporters of Burnham and acknowledging the broader political context without overtly favoring any side. It includes balanced viewpoints on Labour's direction and does not exhibit strong framing biases.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article accurately reports on Andy Burnham's by-election victory and the expectations surrounding his potential role in the Labour Party. It presents the situation with a balanced tone, focusing on the factual outcomes of the election and its political implications.
iNewsIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8523 days ago
The article discusses potential impacts on mortgage rates if Andy Burnham becomes Prime Minister following his victory in the Makerfield by-election. Mortgage experts warn of possible short-term increases due to political uncertainty, though brokers suggest rates might decrease in the long term if Burnham provides clear fiscal policies. The piece explains how political changes indirectly influence mortgage rates through market confidence, gilt yields, and swap rates.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both potential outcomes—short-term rate increases due to uncertainty and long-term decreases if fiscal clarity is provided—without overtly favoring one perspective. It relies on expert opinions and economic principles without apparent ideological framing.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article provides detailed explanations of how political changes could impact mortgage rates, linking them to economic indicators. It cites examples and explains mechanisms clearly. Objectivity is strong as it presents information without taking sides.
openDemocracyIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 8524 days ago
The article discusses the recent by-election results in Makerfield, highlighting Andy Burnham's victory and its implications for the Labour Party. It notes that Burnham's win may secure his position as a potential leader of the party, potentially avoiding a leadership contest if Keir Starmer decides not to run. The piece also mentions the challenges faced by Labour MPs and the possible impact of the far-right Restore Party on the election outcome.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation with a focus on the Labour Party's internal dynamics and the potential rise of Andy Burnham, using terms such as 'pathologically inclined toward self-defeat' to describe some Labour MPs, which implies criticism of the party's current state. The tone suggests optimism
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Accurately presents Burnham's victory and its implications for Starmer. Maintains objective tone by focusing on electoral outcomes rather than personal attacks.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
United Kingdom
