U emisiji "Gledanje snimaka" programa "Elita 9", Maja Marinković je iznenadila publiku šokantnim izrecima o Staniji Dobrojević, koja su, po njenim rečima, ukazivala na duboko nepravilan ponašanje u vezi sa brendom i ponašanjem u rijaliti. Ova izjava je bila ključna u izazivanju novog nivoa napetosti u Beloj kući, gde su učesnici i producenti reagovali s različitim reakcijama. Maja je, u toku rasprave, iznela detalje iz spoljnog sveta koji su povezani sa Stanijinim brendom, što je izazvalo šok i zabrinutost među drugima. Ova izjava je bila nešto više od jednog komentara – bila je pravomerno izraz pohvale za Milenu Kačavendu, koja je, prema njenim rečima, bila u pravu u vezi sa ponašanjem Stanije.
U toku rasprave, Stanija Dobrojević je pokušala da spusti loptu i skrene temu na svoj primarni konflikt sa Asminom Durdžićem, tvrdeći da su ratovi ostalih učesnika apsolutno ne zanimaju. Međutim, Milena Kačavenda nije ostala nema, već je odmah ubacila se u raspravu, podsećajući Dobrojevićevu na njene prve reči po ulasku u Belu kuću, koje su se ticale Anđela. Milena je izneto da je Stanija ušla u Belu kuću da bi elegantno izvučela Anđela iz sukoba sa njom, a sada ga izvlači. Ova izjava je bila izuzetno oštra i izazvala veliku reakciju u prostoru.
U daljem toku rasprave, Stanija je pokušala da objasni situaciju izjavama Marka Đedovića, tvrdeći da je Đedović nije rekao da Sita ulazi, već je rekao da ne zna, a onda posle rekao nešto. Ova izjava je bila pokušaj da se izbegne direktna konfrontacija, ali je izazvala dodatne diskusije i nesigurnost među učesnicima.
U međuvremenu, Asmin Durdžić i Maja Marinković su bili u centru pažnje, a njihov odnos je bio izuzetno napet. U jednoj emisiji, Asmin je iznio detalje o ponašanju Maje, tvrdeći da je bila dosadna i da je zauzimala previše prostora. Maja je, u odgovoru, iznела šokantne detalje o njihovom ponašanju, a njihov konflikt je bio izuzetno izražen. U jednoj emisiji, Asmin je iznio detalje o ponašanju Maje, tvrdeći da je bila dosadna i da je zauzimala previše prostora. Maja je, u odgovoru, iznела šokantne detalje o njihovom ponašanju, a njihov konflikt je bio izuzetno izražen.
U drugim emisijama, kao što su "Pitanja gledalaca" i "Radio-Amnezija", su se pojavili i drugi učesnici, kao što su Aneli Ahmić, Luka Vujović, i dr., koji su iznosili svoje mišljenja o različitim aspektima programa. Aneli Ahmić je, na primer, izniosla detalje o svojim odnosima sa Lepim Mićom, dok su Luka Vujović i Aniti Stanojlović iznosili svoje planove nakon izlaska iz rijalitija. Ovi razgovori su bili izuzetno izraženi i izazvali veliku pažnju javnosti.
U jednoj emisiji, "Igra istine", su se pojavili i drugi učesnici, kao što su Dača Virijević i Milena Kačavenda, koji su iznosili svoje mišljenja o različitim aspektima programa. Dača Virijević je iznio detalje o ponašanju Milene Kačavende, tvrdeći da je bila neiskrena i da je izazivala velike probleme u Beloj kući. Milena Kačavenda je, u odgovoru, iznела detalje o ponašanju Dače, tvrdeći da je bio neiskorenjen. Ovi razgovori su bili izuzetno izraženi i izazvali veliku pažnju javnosti.
U međuvremenu, su se pojavili i drugi učesnici, kao što su Matora, Jovana Tomić, i dr., koji su iznosili svoje mišljenja o različitim aspektima programa. Matora je izniosla detalje o odnosima Asmina i Maje, tvrdeći da između njih nema ljubavi, već samo strast. Ova izjava je bila izuzetno izražena i izazvala veliku pažnju javnosti.
U toku emisije, su se pojavili i drugi učesnici, kao što su Luka Vujović, Aniti Stanojlović, i dr., koji su iznosili svoje mišljenja o različitim aspektima programa. Luka Vujović je izniosla detalje o svojim planovima nakon izlaska iz rijalitija, dok su Aniti Stanojlović iznosili svoje planove o porodičnim susretima i budućim obavezama. Ovi razgovori su bili izuzetno izraženi i izazvali veliku pažnju javnosti.
U međuvremenu, su se pojavili i drugi učesnici, kao što su Matora, Jovana Tomić, i dr., koji su iznosili svoje mišljenja o različitim aspektima programa. Matora je izniosla detalje o odnosima Asmina i Maje, tvrdeći da između njih nema ljubavi, već samo strast. Ova izjava je bila izuzetno izražena i izazvala veliku pažnju javnosti.
U toku emisije, su se pojavili i drugi učesnici, kao što su Luka Vujović, Aniti Stanojlović, i dr., koji su iznosili svoje mišljenja o različitim aspektima programa. Luka Vujović je izniosla detalje o svojim planovima nakon izlaska iz rijalitija, dok su Aniti Stanojlović iznosili svoje planove o porodičnim susretima i budućim obavezama. Ovi razgovori su bili izuzetno izraženi i izazvali veliku pažnju javnosti.
U međuvremenu, su se pojavili i drugi učesnici, kao što su Matora, Jovana Tomić, i dr., koji su iznosili svoje mišljenja o različitim aspektima programa. Matora je izniosla detalje o odnosima Asmina i Maje, tvrdeći da između njih nema ljubavi, već samo strast. Ova izjava je bila izuzetno izražena i izazvala veliku pažnju javnosti.
19 reports
RepublikaParty-alignedLeftFactual 88Objective 5015 days agoIn an episode of 'Gledanje snimaka,' Maja Marinković expressed her opinion on the conflict between Milena Kačavenda and Asmina Durdžić, but the discussion quickly shifted to focus on Stanija Dobrojević's behavior. Marinković supported Kačavenda, recalling past reactions from Dobrojević and revealing details about Dobrojević's brand and alleged frustration before entering reality TV. She claimed that Dobrojević cried when she called her 'babica' (grandmother), while now Dobrojević refers to Kačavenda as 'babica.' Dobrojević attempted to redirect the conversation back to her main conflict with D
Bias read (Left): The article presents Maja Marinković's perspective in a supportive manner toward Milena Kačavenda, using emotionally charged language such as 'plakala je kad sam je nazvala babom' (she cried when I called her grandmother). The framing emphasizes Stanija Dobrojević's actions negatively, suggesting a左
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 50): This article includes detailed statements from Maja about Stanija and Milena, aligning with the cross-source consensus. However, it presents Maja's perspective prominently without balancing it with opposing views, leading to a lower objectivity score.
RepublikaParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 6518 days ago NERIO RUŽANJI OBRISAO PATOS SA TETKOM ANELI: Isplivali mračni detalji iz porodice Ahmić - MUK (VIDEO)The article discusses events from the reality show 'Elita 9,' focusing on Aneli Ahmić, who is currently leading the show. During a budget distribution segment, she awarded funds to Lepi Mića and expressed appreciation for his advice, comparing him to her father. This led to a heated discussion among participants. The article also mentions Nerio Ružanji reflecting on his relationship with Aneli and the impact she had on him during his time in the show.
Bias read (Center): The article covers a cultural event (reality TV show) without any overt political commentary, framing, or bias. It reports on interactions between contestants without taking sides or using loaded language.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): The article provides detailed quotes and descriptions of events from the show, but some details may be dramatized or exaggerated for effect. The content aligns with the general consensus found in other articles, though it leans more towards entertainment than strict factual reporting.
RepublikaParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 6018 days ago STANNY WILL BECOME THE WILD OF THE FACT: The unseen drama in "Elite", whose scream echoed the Shiman people!The article describes a tense situation at 'Elita' where contestants were tasked with choosing someone willing to do anything for a goal. Jovana Cvijanović sparked controversy by discussing bizarre photos involving an elderly man. The program was interrupted when Milena Kačavenda entered a conflict with Stanija Dobrojević, exchanging harsh words. Various participants expressed their motivations and conflicts, including references to personal relationships and competition goals.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on entertainment and reality TV dynamics without overt political commentary or bias. It reports on events within a show without taking a stance on broader political issues.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 60): The article provides detailed quotes and descriptions of events but lacks clear sourcing. The content appears consistent with other reports, though some statements may be dramatized. The tone is highly emotional and biased toward certain participants.
RepublikaParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 5015 days ago The most monstrous sentence ever uttered ENJOY the program!In the reality show 'Elita 9', during the segment 'Pitanja gledalaca,' tensions arose among participants Asmin Durdžić, Aneli Ahmić, Stanija Dobrojević, and Maja Marinković. Host Maša Mihailović gave Stanija the floor to speak about her relationship with Asmin and his relationship with Aneli. Stanija claimed she knew Asmin well and suggested Aneli lacked tact in dealing with him. Aneli responded by saying she did not know what viewers expected from her and that they provoked her. Asmin criticized Aneli, calling her weak and entangled in lies, and challenged her to bring Nora into the situation
Bias read (Center): The article reports on events from a reality TV show without taking a stance or showing bias. It presents quotes and interactions between participants without favoring any side.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 50): The article recounts heated exchanges during the show, using direct quotes. However, it employs emotionally charged language like 'brutalno poniženje' and 'kvarna,' showing a clear bias against Maja Marinković.
RepublikaParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 5023 days ago Asmin and Maya without censorship: After brutal arguments, Durjit is sweeter - don't give the boys the chance to sleep! (video)Reality TV participants Maja Marinković and Asmin Durdžić have once again drawn attention with their intense interactions on 'Elite 9.' After a heated argument involving Uroš Stanić over a pink flamingo toy, the conflict escalated into a verbal dispute and physical altercation. The production team has decided to penalize Maja by withholding her six-month salary due to her involvement in the incident.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on events from a reality television show without taking a stance on any political issue. It focuses on entertainment and personal conflicts among participants, using neutral language and presenting facts without evident bias.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 50): The article reports on the conflict involving Aneli and the reaction from Maja, aligning with the consensus. However, it uses phrases like 'zapušio usta' which suggest a biased narrative, affecting the overall objectivity score.
RepublikaParty-alignedCenterFactual 80Objective 5521 days ago The theme of the episode "Elit 9" was changed to "Philippine Cara" by Maja Marinković (Video)The article discusses a sensitive issue involving Maja Marinković and the topic of Filip Car's entry into 'Elita 9'. It references a video and mentions it as a 'painful point' for Marinković.
Bias read (Center): The article does not provide enough information to determine a clear ideological slant. It refers to a personal and cultural matter without overtly favoring any political perspective.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 55): The article accurately reports on the conflict involving Maja Marinković and Filip Car, citing direct quotes. However, it uses emotionally charged terms like 'besan kao ris' and 'haos,' showing a biased tone.
RepublikaParty-alignedCenterFactual 75Objective 6016 days ago Known Where the Hardworking Anita Goes After the Final of "ELITE 9": Luka Vujović urgently addressed BiljanaIn the reality show 'Elita 9', participants Luka Vujović and Anita Stanojlović discussed their plans after leaving the show, including family gatherings and personal obligations. Vujović mentioned hoping to see his father in Belgrade and have a family lunch, while Anita needs to visit her family in Kruševac. The article also mentions Vujović's desire to celebrate an upcoming birthday in a special atmosphere.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on entertainment and personal life details of participants in a reality TV show, with no political content or framing. It provides straightforward quotes and does not exhibit any biased language or emphasis.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 60): The article provides specific quotes from Luka Vujović regarding his post-show plans and mentions interactions with Bora Santana and Filip Đukić. However, some statements appear sensationalized (e.g., 'ŠOK! PROCURILE INFORMACIJE') and include speculative or emotionally charged language. The factual
BlicIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 5520 days agoThe article describes Stanija Dobrojević, an attractive participant in the 'Elite 9' reality show, who performed a provocative dance in a bikini at the end of the radio emission 'From the Scene'. Her performance drew attention and admiration from her colleagues Vanja Živić and Marko Janjušević, who were reportedly stunned by her appearance.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on entertainment and celebrity culture with no political content or framing. It objectively reports on a performance and reactions without taking a stance or using biased language.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 55): The article discusses Stanija Dobrojević’s actions and includes quotes from her friend Milo Foks. It uses emotive language like 'besprekoran izgled' and 'zavodljivo uvijala,' which may influence reader perception.
KurirParty-alignedCenterFactual 75Objective 5525 days agoStanija Dobrojević has complained about being harassed by her ex-partner Đorđe Višnjak and his current partner Maja Marinković, who she claims have been watching her negatively. She described feeling exposed while wearing a swimsuit at a pool, saying she felt 'like I'm naked' due to the attention and teasing. Dobrojević also criticized Višnjak's lawyer, stating that her image is worth more than the lawyer's firm. The article mentions ongoing conflicts between Dobrojević and her former partner Asmina Durđić, with whom Marinković is now involved.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on personal conflicts and public comments without overtly favoring any side. It presents quotes from both Stanija Dobrojević and her critics, maintaining a neutral tone.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 55): The article contains direct quotes from Stanija Dobrojević and Dača Virijević, but uses emotionally charged language like 'hijene' and 'boleština teška,' suggesting bias. Some details align with other sources, but the tone leans toward supporting Stanija’s perspective.
KurirParty-alignedCenterFactual 75Objective 5525 days ago "You Have Another 10 Years of Life" Scandalous conflict in Elith, all dreadful of fame!During a reality show meeting, participants were tasked with selecting the most greedy contestant, leading to an intense argument between Marko Janjušević 'Janjuš' and Lepi Mića. Ivan Marinković criticized several contestants, including Murat, for their behavior, calling him unrefined and comparing him unfavorably to someone from Ethiopia rather than Spain. The conflict escalated when Janjuš accused Mića of being greedy for attention, prompting a heated exchange.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a reality TV conflict without taking a stance or showing clear bias in language or sourcing. It presents events as they occurred during the show without apparent ideological framing.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 55): The article provides specific details about the conflict between Janjuš and Mića, but some statements appear exaggerated or emotionally charged, such as 'skandalozan sukob' and 'jezive reči.' The factual content aligns with other reports but lacks neutrality in its presentation.
RepublikaParty-alignedCenterFactual 75Objective 4017 days ago DARK VIREVIC to the bathroom RASKRINKA MILEN KACAVEND: He found out that he was washing his panties to the roommates, so he came out with all the bad news about the conversation!During an episode of 'Igra istine' at the White House, a heated argument broke out between Milena Kačavenda and Dača Virijević. Kačavenda accused Virijević of being foolish, while Virijević responded by accusing her of washing others' underwear and switching sides during the game. He also claimed she lied about financial transactions and criticized her for spreading negative comments about other contestants.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a conflict between two participants in a reality TV show without taking a stance or showing clear bias toward either side. The content focuses on their verbal exchange and does not present any overtly biased language or selective sourcing.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 40): The article presents details of a confrontation between Milena Kačavenda and Dača Virijević during an episode of 'Igra istine'. While it includes direct quotes and specific accusations, some statements may be dramatized or taken out of context. The objectivity score is low due to emotionally charged
RepublikaParty-alignedCenterFactual 70Objective 5524 days ago UNCLE DANE ENTERS "ELITE 9" RIGHT BEFORE THE END?! Tetovki is going to get sick - Sofija Janićijević's dirty laundry exposed! (VIDEO)A tabloid entertainment article about Serbian reality television personalities, alluding to alleged personal drama involving Sofia Janičijević and someone potentially entering a show called 'Elite 9,' though specific details are not provided.
Bias read (Center): The article employs tabloid sensationalism and vague scandal-baiting but does not exhibit left or right political framing; the bias is entertainment-focused rather than ideological.
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 55): The article accurately recounts the conflict between Janjuš and Mića, citing direct dialogue. However, it uses emotionally charged terms like 'skandalozan sukob' and 'jezive reči,' which reduce its overall objectivity.
BlicIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 5020 days ago A NEPISMA IS AND YOU DON'T KNOW TWO CASES" The Zadrugar woman humbled Aneli: But she also mentioned FilipDuring the 'Nominacije' show, tensions rose among participants due to harsh comments and conflicting opinions. Vanja Živić was at the center of attention, attempting to undermine Aneli Ahmić by calling her illiterate and criticizing her relationship with Filip.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on events from a reality TV show without taking a stance or using biased language. It simply describes the interactions and conflicts between participants without favoring any side.
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 50): The article accurately describes the conflict involving Vanja Živić and Aneli Ahmić but uses emotionally charged language ('nepismena,' 'budalom') that affects objectivity. It presents facts but with a clear bias towards Vanja's perspective.
BlicIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 4525 days ago "You Have Only Ten Years to Live" Scandalous conflict in Elith, all dreadful of fame!During a reality show meeting in 'Elita,' tensions escalated into a personal conflict between Marko Janjušević Janjuš and Lepi Mića after Ivan Marinković presented a controversial list of the most greedy contestants. The discussion turned heated when Mića responded with harsh remarks, referencing past conflicts and old information, which shocked everyone present.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a conflict within a reality TV show without taking a stance or showing bias toward any participant. It focuses on describing events as they occurred without apparent ideological framing or selective emphasis.
Why these scores (Factual 65 · Objective 45): The article provides detailed accounts of the conflict but includes subjective descriptions and biased language, such as 'boravio je u rijalitiju za džabe,' which suggests an opinion rather than a neutral report.
KurirParty-alignedCenterFactual 65Objective 3515 days ago Matora believes that Durčić and Marinkovićka are together because of this: They only feel passionJovana Tomić Matora komentariše odnose u 'Eliti 9', posebno među sudionicama Anelom Ahmić, Asminom Durdžić i Majom Marinković. Matora tvrdi da Asmina i Maja nisu u pravoj ljubavi, već su zajedno zbog nekog cilja, a da osećaju samo strast. Takođe govori o nedostatku poverenja ka Dragani Kačavendi i njenom odnosu sa Majo.
Bias read (Center): The article discusses personal relationships and comments within a reality TV show, with no explicit political content or framing. The focus is on interpersonal dynamics rather than policy, ideology, or political figures.
Why these scores (Factual 65 · Objective 35): The article presents statements from Jovana Tomić Matora regarding relationships between contestants in 'Elita 9' but uses emotionally charged language like 'strast osećaju' and frames the situation as if there is a clear truth being revealed. The claims are based solely on Matora's opinions without
RepublikaParty-alignedCenterFactual 60Objective 4016 days ago Shock-bomb, ASMINU DURDZICI DEFEATED ALL HONOR! The information released on Pinka, he stayed in the reality show for free!The article discusses a recent conflict between Maja Marinković and Asmin Durđić during the reality show 'Elita.' During their conversation, Maja attempted to set boundaries and demands, which led to an intense reaction from Asmin, who announced he would leave the show without payment due to multiple penalties for rule violations. The article also mentions rumors about Maja's potential pregnancy, which may have influenced her decision not to attend a previous event.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a personal and cultural conflict within a reality TV show with no direct political implications. It presents the situation neutrally, quoting both participants without apparent bias or ideological framing.
Why these scores (Factual 60 · Objective 40): The article includes direct quotes and events but uses emotionally charged language and takes a clear stance on the relationship dynamics, affecting both factual accuracy and neutrality.
RepublikaParty-alignedCenterFactual 60Objective 3518 days ago ANALY Ahmić has spoken publicly to Goci Trzhan! (Video)Aneli Ahmić, a participant in the reality show 'Elita 9,' has sparked controversy by criticizing other contestants during a budget allocation event at the White House. She accused Theodora Delić of being obsessed with Filip Đukić and claimed she had fabricated events involving him. Dragana responded by denying any prior planning. Jovana Tomić Matora also commented on the situation.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a controversy within a reality TV show without taking a clear stance or using biased language. It presents statements from multiple participants without evident favoritism toward any side.
Why these scores (Factual 60 · Objective 35): The article presents events from multiple perspectives but uses inflammatory language ('prljav veš,' 'monstrum otac') and appears to take sides, particularly with Aleksandra Nikolić's comments, affecting both factual accuracy and objectivity.
RepublikaParty-alignedCenter12 days ago STANCE MAY BE GONE IN "ELITE 9": Shock-bombed before the grand finale, her name is suddenly announced!The article discusses recent developments in the reality show 'Elita 9,' focusing on tensions between contestants Asmina Durdžić and Milena Kačavenda. There have been rumors of a potential alliance between them to challenge Stanija Dobrojević ahead of the final. Mustafa Durdžić, Asmina's father, made a notable statement on his Facebook profile expressing admiration for Milena and stating she has become his favorite to win. He praised her strength, intelligence, and determination, suggesting she stands out as a unique competitor who defies typical reality show dynamics.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a reality TV show and personal opinions expressed by a contestant's father. While there is some commentary on competition and alliances, the framing remains neutral, presenting statements without overt bias or ideological slant. The content does not engage with political or政策性
RepublikaParty-alignedRight25 days ago MAY MARINKOVICE HUMILITY! This must not be told to her, while the program is being deleted!The article discusses the distribution of budgets within a political organization, focusing on the harsh criticism directed at members including Maja Marinković, Nenad Macanović Bebica, and Teodora by the leader, referred to as 'Lepi Mića.' The text details the leader's sharp comments during the budget allocation process, particularly targeting Marinković's moral standing, family, and contradictory positions expressed behind closed doors. Similar scrutiny was applied to Bebica and Teodora regarding their relationship.
Bias read (Right): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'brutalno poniženje' (brutal humiliation), 'surowe analize' (harsh analyses), and 'ogoli njihov turbulentan odnos' (expose their turbulent relationship). It frames the leader's actions as justified and highlights the moral failings of the targets
Serbia
