ON
← Back to feed
Serbian government proposes to dissolve parliament and hold early elections
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive9/7/2026

Serbian government proposes to dissolve parliament and hold early elections

The Serbian government, led by Prime Minister Đuro Macut, has proposed early parliamentary elections following sustained public pressure. The proposal was made during an extraordinary cabinet meeting, with Macut emphasizing the need to address societal tensions and restore public trust through democratic processes. He argued that elections are a demonstration of democratic strength rather than weakness. President Aleksandar Vučić had previously announced plans for early elections, which were initially expected to take place on October 18th or 25th, but recent decisions have shifted the date to October 25th. The ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) has decided that Vučić will lead the 'United Serbia' list and could become prime minister if his party wins. Vučić has indicated he would accept the decision regarding the candidate for prime minister, and the election is now set to be called by September 10th. This move comes amid ongoing protests following the November 2024 incident at the railway station in Novi Sad.

The Serbian government has recommended to President Aleksander Vučić that he dissolve parliament and call early parliamentary elections. This recommendation marks the start of a 72-hour period during which Vučić must decide whether to accept the proposal. The move comes amid ongoing anti-government protests that have lasted over a year, with demonstrators demanding early elections following the collapse of a canopy at a train station in Novi Sad in November 2024, which resulted in 16 deaths. Prime Minister Đuro Macut presented the proposal during an extraordinary session of the government, emphasizing that parts of the public have long called for early parliamentary elections. “A responsible government never ignores such demands,” he stated. According to Macut, holding elections would help reduce social tensions, move away from exhausting disputes, and eliminate doubts about the will of the people. He added that elections represent “an opportunity to strengthen institutions, reduce tensions, reject exclusionist policies, and return political struggle from the streets back to institutions.” Vučić had previously indicated that early elections would take place either on October 18 or 25. Last week, pro-government media reported that the country’s leadership had decided on October 25 as the election date. Vučić would need to announce the elections by September 10 at the latest, according to the electoral law, which stipulates that the period between the announcement of elections and their conduct must be at least 45 days and no more than 60 days. The main committee of the ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) decided last Saturday that Vučić would lead the United Serbia list in the early elections and would be the party’s candidate for prime minister if he wins. Earlier this week, Vučić said he was prepared to accept the SNS’s wish regarding his candidacy for prime minister. He also announced that he would announce the elections “within a few days, on September 9 or 10.” Vučić’s position as prime minister would allow him to remain in power. His second presidential term will expire in May 2027, and under the constitution, he would no longer be eligible to run for president again. Macut, a Belgrade-based endocrinologist and professor at the Medical Faculty, was appointed prime minister on Vučić’s recommendation and received support from the parliament and governing coalition led by the SNS on April 16 of last year. The student-led anti-corruption movement began after the canopy collapse in Novi Sad, which was widely attributed to entrenched corruption. Initially, protesters demanded a transparent investigation into the incident, but their demands soon expanded to include calls for early elections. These demonstrations have continued throughout the year, with students blocking universities and pressuring the government. Government officials have repeatedly promised to hold elections but had not yet set a specific date. Vučić recently indicated that he would step down as president before his term ends in April 2027 to participate in the campaign. The SNS has decided to ask him to lead its electoral list and stand as its candidate for prime minister. The situation in Serbia has remained tense since the canopy collapse in November 2024. Mass anti-government protests have erupted in Belgrade, Novi Sad, and other cities across the country, with students forming the core of the movement. In addition to demanding accountability for those responsible for the canopy collapse and fighting systemic corruption, the protesters are also seeking early parliamentary elections.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 3 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

3 reports

24ur (POP TV) logo24ur (POP TV)IndependentProgressiveFactual 78Objective 689/7/2026
Serbian government proposes to dissolve parliament and hold early elections

The Serbian government, led by Prime Minister Đuro Macut, has proposed early parliamentary elections following sustained public pressure. The proposal was made during an extraordinary cabinet meeting, with Macut emphasizing the need to address societal tensions and restore public trust through democratic processes. He argued that elections are a demonstration of democratic strength rather than weakness. President Aleksandar Vučić had previously announced plans for early elections, which were initially expected to take place on October 18th or 25th, but recent decisions have shifted the date to October 25th. The ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) has decided that Vučić will lead the 'United Serbia' list and could become prime minister if his party wins. Vučić has indicated he would accept the decision regarding the candidate for prime minister, and the election is now set to be called by September 10th. This move comes amid ongoing protests following the November 2024 incident at the railway station in Novi Sad.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the call for early elections as a necessary democratic action to resolve societal tensions and restore public confidence. It emphasizes the legitimacy of the government’s actions and portrays Vučić as responsive to public demands. The language used highlights the importance of re-

Why factuality (78): This article confirms the proposal by the Serbian government to dissolve parliament and call early elections, with a 72-hour deadline for Vučić. It includes quotes from Premier Macut and references to media reports about the state council's decision to set October 25th as election day. The informati

Why objectivity (68): While the article remains relatively neutral in reporting facts, it uses emotionally charged language such as 'priložnost za krepitev institucij' which suggests a positive view of the government's actions. The framing of the protests as calls for democratic accountability may subtly favor the govern

Slovenske novice logoSlovenske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 659/7/2026
Tensions in Serbia: Government proposes to President Vučić to dissolve parliament and call elections

The Serbian government has proposed to President Aleksandar Vučić that he dissolve parliament and call early parliamentary elections, initiating a 72-hour period during which Vučić must decide whether to accept the proposal. This move comes amid ongoing protests by anti-government groups demanding early elections, which they have been requesting for over a year following the death of a student in a train station incident in November 2024. Prime Minister Đuro Macut emphasized that the government cannot ignore such demands and stated that holding new elections would be the most democratic solution to reduce societal tensions. Vučić had previously announced plans for early elections on either October 18th or 25th, with the final decision expected by September 10th. Meanwhile, the ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) has decided that Vučić will lead their electoral list and could become prime minister if elected, allowing him to remain in power beyond his current term.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the government's proposal and the opposition's demands without overtly favoring one side. It includes direct quotes from both the prime minister and the president, providing balanced perspectives on the situation. There is no evident bias in the language or framing of the报道

Why factuality (75): The article reports that the Serbian government has proposed dissolving parliament and calling early elections, with a 72-hour period for President Vučić to decide. It mentions Premier Đuro Macut's statement about public demand for early elections and references media reports about the decision by t

Why objectivity (65): The tone is somewhat supportive of the government's actions, using phrases like 'ni bolj demokratičnega in močnega odgovora' which implies approval of the government's stance. The article also frames the protests as demands for democratic accountability, which may reflect a biased perspective.

STA – Slovenska tiskovna agencija logoSTA – Slovenska tiskovna agencijaState / PublicCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 679/7/2026
Serbia closer to early parliamentary elections

The Serbian government has proposed to dissolve parliament and call for early parliamentary elections, initiating a 72-hour period during which President Aleksandar Vučić must decide whether to accept the proposal. This move comes after over a year of demands from opposition groups who have been calling for early elections. The decision marks a significant development in Serbia's political landscape, potentially leading to a change in the country's governance structure.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation neutrally by reporting both the government's proposal and the opposition's longstanding demands without overtly favoring either side. It focuses on the procedural aspects of the potential early elections rather than taking a stance on the merits of the proposal or抨

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (67): The article maintains a generally neutral tone but presents the situation through the lens of media reports, which may have a particular bias. The focus on the government's action without extensive coverage of opposing viewpoints could suggest a lack of balance.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories