ON
← Back to feed
Spin Time, 120 people relocated, but protests against remote facilities are growing: "We don't want to leave the neighborhood"
Italy🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive11 days ago

Spin Time, 120 people relocated, but protests against remote facilities are growing: "We don't want to leave the neighborhood"

The article discusses the ongoing situation of former occupants of the Spin Time building in Rome, which was evacuated after an arson incident on July 29th. Following a municipal order, approximately 120 people have been relocated to approved shelters and religious facilities, but around 150 others have chosen to remain homeless, continuing their occupation of the site. The main issue is the distance of the proposed accommodations, with three structures located outside the Grande Raccordo Anulare, contrary to the residents' request to stay within their neighborhood. This has raised concerns about disrupting children's schooling continuity. Meanwhile, the Municipality of Rome had offered to purchase the building to allow gradual reoccupation, but the property owner rejected this, citing structural unsuitability. This claim is disputed by Fratelli d'Italia, which claims the Ministry of Interior ruled against reentry for safety and legality reasons. A new meeting is scheduled for August 11th to discuss solutions. Notably, British director Ken Loach and other intellectuals have expressed solidarity with the community, highlighting the challenges of living on the streets, especially for

The city of Rome has begun relocating former occupants of Spin Time, a building located at via di Santa Croce in Gerusalemme, following an ordinance issued by the mayor. As of the latest update, approximately 120 individuals have been moved into temporary accommodations arranged through the Civil Protection service and some religious institutions. However, around 150 others continue to reside outside the structure, maintaining their encampment near the site. The issue stems primarily from the distance of the proposed housing options, which many residents find unacceptable. Three of the designated shelters lie beyond the Grande Raccordo Anulare, the ring road surrounding Rome, despite repeated requests from the community to remain within their current neighborhood where they live, work, and maintain established relationships. The situation arose after an arson incident on July 29, which led to the evacuation of the building. The Municipality of Rome had previously submitted a proposal to acquire the property from Investire SGR, the company that owns the structure, with the aim of enabling gradual return of its former occupants. This offer was rejected by the company, citing a technical assessment that deemed the building uninhabitable. This claim has been disputed by the political party Fratelli d’Italia, which asserts that the Ministry of Interior had ruled against reoccupation due to safety and legal concerns. In response to ongoing challenges, a new meeting has been scheduled for August 11 at the City Hall, where representatives from the municipal government will discuss future steps regarding the relocation of the displaced individuals. The community continues to hold its encampment, insisting that the process should continue until every person has access to shelter. The mayor’s office has indicated that solutions have been found for 120 individuals, yet activists argue that these placements often take them away from the Esquilino district and central Rome, disrupting both personal networks and children's schooling continuity. Among the seven available options, three are situated outside the ring road, ranging from northern suburbs like La Storta to coastal areas such as the Roman Riviera. One resident expressed her reluctance to relocate, stating, “I refuse to move an hour and a half away from here. My husband works nearby, and I need regular medical care at the Policlinico Umberto I. Without a car, we wouldn’t know how to get around.” Others have opted to stay in the encampment rather than accept the offered housing, preferring the familiar surroundings over distant locations. These decisions reflect broader concerns about displacement and the erosion of the supportive network that Spin Time has fostered among its inhabitants. Meanwhile, public figures and artists have shown solidarity with the community. British filmmaker Ken Loach has sent a message expressing his support, recalling the time he spent with the residents and highlighting the emotional impact of their shared experiences. He emphasized the difficulty of living outdoors, particularly for children, and praised the community’s spirit of generosity and compassion. Other notable supporters include Fiorella Mannoia, Roberto Saviano, Paola Turci, and Giorgio Parisi, who has spoken out against inequality and marginalization. Organizations such as Amnesty International and Una nessuna centomila have also joined the campaign. Artistic expressions of support have taken form, including a new installation by the artist Laika outside the headquarters of Investire SGR. The artwork features a tent used by activists, depicting a girl holding a shield bearing the Spin Time emblem pierced by three arrows symbolizing speculation, repression, and abandonment. These gestures underscore the deepening sense of urgency and collective resolve among those affected by the ongoing crisis. As the situation evolves, the community remains steadfast in its demand for dignified housing and continued support.

4 reports

ANSA logoANSAIndependentCenterFactual 100Objective 9011 days ago
Spin Time, the property is allocating 500,000 euros for the housing emergency.

The property owner of the Spin Time building in Rome, which was damaged by a fire on July 29, has pledged €500,000 to assist the city in addressing the housing emergency for former occupants who lost their homes. The contribution will be provided through a payment delegation to the City of Rome, specifically to cover costs related to finding temporary housing solutions. Priority will be given to structures located in the Esquilino neighborhood to protect particularly vulnerable situations and ensure the continuity of schooling and education for children, while preserving the local ties of affected families.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a straightforward statement from the property owner regarding financial assistance to the city for a housing crisis caused by a fire. There is no evident framing bias, loaded language, or selective sourcing. The information is reported neutrally, focusing on the actions taken by

Why factuality (100): This article provides a clear and concise account of the situation, stating that Investire Sgr has allocated 500,000 euros to help resolve the housing emergency caused by the fire. It directly cites the company’s statement and explains the conditions under which the funds will be used. All key facts

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting only the official statement from Investire Sgr without taking a stance or injecting subjective language. It focuses on factual reporting and avoids any overt bias or emotional framing.

Il Fatto Quotidiano logoIl Fatto QuotidianoIndependentCenterFactual 98Objective 7511 days ago
Spin Time, the owners of the building give 500 thousand euros to the City of Rome for the evicted families.

The dispute over Spin Time, a building in Rome, continues as the property owner, Investire Sgr, has allocated 500,000 euros to the city of Rome to assist families displaced after a fire occurred in the building on July 29. The residents, who have lived there for 13 years, argue they were evacuated at the explicit request of Investire Sgr and have not been allowed to return home. They insist the only viable solution is the sale of the building to convert it into a cooperative housing model. Two weeks have passed since the incident, but the 400 residents, many of them children, have yet to return. Approximately 160 residents have found temporary accommodations through discussions between the city and the Spin Time community. The city plans to continue searching for suitable housing, prioritizing areas near the Esquilino district and ensuring continuity in schooling and local ties. Investire Sgr will cover the costs of these temporary solutions according to the priorities set during the meeting.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives: the property owner’s financial contribution and the residents' demands for the building’s sale. It does not favor one side over the other, providing balanced quotes from both parties without overtly biased language or selective sourcing.

Why factuality (98): The article accurately reports that Investire Sgr has allocated 500,000 euros to the City of Rome for families affected by the fire at Spin Time. It also includes direct quotes from the residents who argue they were evacuated intentionally by the property owners. The details align closely with the i

Why objectivity (75): The article presents both sides of the issue but leans toward the perspective of the residents of Spin Time, using phrases like 'mette a repentaglio questa comunità da 13 anni' and emphasizing their call for the sale of the building. While it does include the property owner’s contribution, the frami

ANSA logoANSAIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 7813 days ago
Ken Loach's solidarity with Spin Time, first housing for 120 people.

The ongoing street occupation at Spin Time continues, alongside demonstrations of solidarity from various groups, including filmmaker Ken Loach. Efforts to find alternative housing for the former occupants are progressing slowly, despite support from international organizations and Italian cinema figures. The Rome City Council claims solutions have been found for 120 people, but activists argue many of these options are located far from the Esquilino district and central Rome, disrupting community ties and children’s schooling. Some residents refuse relocation due to distance from jobs and healthcare facilities, while others choose to remain in the street protest rather than accept the new accommodations. At least 150 people are still camped outside the building, though the mayor has mandated their removal from the street. A meeting with city officials is scheduled for the next day.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives, activists’ concerns about displacement and the city’s efforts to provide housing, without overtly favoring one side. It includes quotes from protesters and mentions the city’s actions, maintaining a balanced tone.

Why factuality (88): This ANSA article provides detailed information on the ongoing efforts to relocate residents, mentioning Ken Loach’s support and the challenges faced. It includes specifics such as the number of people relocated and the distances involved. The reference to the rejected municipal offer and the politi

Why objectivity (78): While the article acknowledges the difficulties faced by the residents, it maintains a generally neutral tone. However, there is a subtle emphasis on the solidarity shown by figures like Ken Loach, which may slightly favor the perspective of the protesters.

Open logoOpenIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7513 days ago
Spin Time, 120 people relocated, but protests against remote facilities are growing: "We don't want to leave the neighborhood"

The article discusses the ongoing situation of former occupants of the Spin Time building in Rome, which was evacuated after an arson incident on July 29th. Following a municipal order, approximately 120 people have been relocated to approved shelters and religious facilities, but around 150 others have chosen to remain homeless, continuing their occupation of the site. The main issue is the distance of the proposed accommodations, with three structures located outside the Grande Raccordo Anulare, contrary to the residents' request to stay within their neighborhood. This has raised concerns about disrupting children's schooling continuity. Meanwhile, the Municipality of Rome had offered to purchase the building to allow gradual reoccupation, but the property owner rejected this, citing structural unsuitability. This claim is disputed by Fratelli d'Italia, which claims the Ministry of Interior ruled against reentry for safety and legality reasons. A new meeting is scheduled for August 11th to discuss solutions. Notably, British director Ken Loach and other intellectuals have expressed solidarity with the community, highlighting the challenges of living on the streets, especially for

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a struggle for housing rights and social justice, emphasizing the hardship faced by the displaced individuals and the lack of support from local authorities. It highlights the opposition to dispersal and the call for staying in the neighborhood, aligning with left

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the situation at Spin Time, including the evacuation after the fire, the transfer of 120 people, and the continued protest by 150 others. It mentions the distance issue with the proposed accommodations and the rejected offer from the city to buy the building. The artic

Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat sympathetic to the protesters, emphasizing their concerns about displacement and community continuity. There is a slight bias towards portraying the situation as difficult and the authorities as less responsive, though not overtly partisan.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories