In a significant legal development, Donald Trump has been ordered to pay $5 million to E. Jean Carroll, a columnist who accused him of sexual assault and defamation. This ruling comes after a jury awarded her the sum in a civil case that was initiated in 2022. The case centered around allegations that Trump sexually assaulted Carroll in a department store in New York during the mid-1990s, as well as his claims that she fabricated the story to boost book sales. Carroll first filed a lawsuit against Trump in 2019 for defamation, and then again in 2022 for defamation and harassment following the adoption of a law in New York State allowing victims of sexual assault to pursue civil cases for past incidents. This second case was the first to go to trial, resulting in the jury awarding her $5 million.
The 2019 case had previously resulted in a judgment of $83 million against Trump, which, along with interest, brings the total amount Carroll seeks to over $100 million. Trump's attorneys challenged the proceedings before federal judge Lewis Kaplan, arguing that the jury should not have heard testimonies from two women who accused him of previous sexual assaults, nor should they have viewed the infamous "Access Hollywood" tape from 2005. In that clip, Trump remarked on how he is automatically attracted to beautiful women and how being a celebrity allows him to engage in such behavior freely.
The Second Circuit Appellate Court upheld the $5 million verdict last year, stating there were no errors warranting a new trial. Trump lost another attempt in June 2025 to have the matter reviewed by the full court, leading him to appeal to the Supreme Court. His lawyers are expected to file an appeal against the $83 million judgment in the coming days.
In 2023, Trump transferred $5.5 million to a court-controlled account following the jury’s decision, meaning Carroll could potentially receive the funds relatively quickly. Her attorney was not immediately available for comment.
The Supreme Court’s recent rejection of Trump’s appeal means that the $5 million judgment stands, and Carroll can proceed with collecting the money. This marks a major legal victory for her and adds to the growing list of financial liabilities facing Trump, including the $83 million judgment from the earlier case. The outcome underscores the ongoing legal battles surrounding Trump, particularly concerning allegations of sexual misconduct and defamation.
The case has drawn considerable public attention, especially given the broader implications for accountability and justice in high-profile legal disputes involving powerful individuals. Carroll's ability to collect the $5 million judgment highlights the effectiveness of legal mechanisms designed to hold individuals accountable for their actions, even when those actions occurred decades ago. It also reflects the evolving landscape of civil rights and protections for victims of sexual assault, particularly in states like New York where legislation has expanded access to justice for survivors.
The legal process has been complex and multifaceted, with multiple layers of appeals and challenges. Each stage of the proceedings has brought forth various arguments and counterarguments, reflecting the intricate nature of civil litigation, especially in cases involving high-profile figures. The involvement of the Supreme Court in this instance further emphasizes the significance of the case within the broader legal framework.
As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen whether Trump will continue to challenge the rulings or seek alternative avenues for resolution. Meanwhile, Carroll and her legal team are likely preparing for the next steps in securing the awarded funds, which could have substantial personal and financial implications for both parties involved. The case serves as a reminder of the enduring impact of legal decisions on individuals and the importance of upholding judicial processes in pursuit of justice.
3 reports
OslobođenjeIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 657 days agoThe Supreme Court of the United States has rejected President Donald Trump's appeal against a ruling requiring him to pay $5 million to E. Jean Carroll for sexual assault and defamation. This decision allows Carroll, a magazine columnist, to collect the amount awarded by the jury in a case initiated in 2022. The lawsuit relates to alleged incidents in the 1990s at a retail store in New York and Trump's claims that Carroll fabricated the story to boost her book sales. Carroll first sued Trump in 2019 for defamation, then again in 2022 after New York state passed a law allowing victims of sexual assault to file civil suits for past incidents. The 2022 case was the first to go to trial, resulting in the $5 million award. A separate 2019 case resulted in a $83 million verdict against Trump, which, including interest, totals over $100 million. Trump's lawyers challenged the trial before federal judge Lewis Kaplan, arguing that the jury was improperly allowed to hear testimonies from two women who accused Trump of prior sexual assaults and view the 2005 'Access Hollywood' tape where Trump made lewd remarks. The Second Circuit Appellate Court upheld the $5 million judgment last year, depl
Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings involving Donald Trump and E. Jean Carroll in a balanced manner, citing both the court's decision and Trump's legal challenges without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from the 'Access Hollywood' tape and mentions both parties' legal
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): Highly factual, matching the first article in reporting the Supreme Court’s rejection of Trump’s appeal and the implications for Carroll. It maintains consistency with the cross-source consensus but still leans toward supporting Carroll’s claim, with limited balance on Trump’s legal arguments.
Klix.baIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 657 days agoThe Supreme Court has rejected Donald Trump's appeal regarding a $5 million judgment against him for sexual misconduct, allowing the plaintiff, E. Jean Carroll, to collect the amount awarded by a jury in a case dating back to the mid-1990s. The lawsuit involved allegations of assault at a New York store and Trump's claim that Carroll fabricated the story to boost her book sales. Carroll first sued Trump in 2019 for defamation, then again in 2022 after New York passed a law enabling victims of sexual abuse to file civil suits for past incidents. The 2022 case was the first to go to trial, resulting in the $5 million award. A separate 2019 case resulted in an $83 million verdict against Trump, which, including interest, totals over $100 million. Trump's lawyers challenged the trial before Judge Lewis Kaplan, arguing that the jury improperly heard testimony from two women who accused him of prior sexual assaults and viewed the 'Access Hollywood' tape from 2005, where Trump made lewd remarks. The Second Circuit Appellate Court upheld the $5 million ruling last year, finding no grounds for retrial. Trump lost his attempt to have the case reviewed by the full court in June 2025 and now转向
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about legal proceedings involving a high-profile political figure without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on judicial decisions and legal arguments neutrally, providing both sides of the case without emphasizing one over the other.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): Factual accuracy is high as it aligns with known legal proceedings involving Trump and E. Jean Carroll, including the $5 million verdict and the $83 million ruling. However, the article presents a clear narrative favoring Carroll and implies Trump’s guilt without balancing with his defense arguments
Klix.baIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 607 days ago Spacey on the molestation allegations: I didn't say there was no "fire", I was courting a lot of menKevin Spacey, known for his roles in films like 'American Beauty' and 'The Usual Suspects,' discussed allegations of sexual misconduct during an interview on Bill Maher's podcast 'Club Random.' He stated he does not deny that there was any 'fire' but emphasized that it was not a 'wild fire' and that he had been flirting with many men. The allegations against him first emerged in a 2017 BuzzFeed article, leading to multiple accusations that severely impacted his career. Anthony Rapp filed a civil lawsuit worth $40 million, but a jury in New York found Spacey not responsible for any charges. During the interview, Maher acknowledged some allegations might have merit but noted he wasn't fully informed about all claims. Spacey admitted his behavior crossed boundaries in certain situations and mentioned feeling less confined now, believing people are starting to hear the facts and understand that he won court cases. He also commented on how his situation would have been viewed differently if he were a sports figure.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both Spacey's statements and Maher's responses neutrally, without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both parties and provides background on the legal outcomes without apparent bias.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 60): Factually consistent with the broader legal context of Trump vs. Carroll, though some details like the $5.5 million transfer are only partially explained. Objectivity is lower due to the focus on Carroll’s potential recovery and less attention to Trump’s legal challenges, presenting a more sympathet
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
BA
