Some Jewish allies of Mamdani denounce his use of ‘monsters’ to describe AIPAC

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani recently sparked controversy after using the term "monsters" to describe the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) during a rally for progressive candidates ahead of the upcoming Democratic primaries. The speech, delivered alongside Senator Bernie Sanders at a Brooklyn venue, drew sharp reactions from some of Mamdani’s Jewish allies, who raised concerns about the potential implications of such language.

Mamdani’s remarks were part of a broader effort to mobilize support for several progressive candidates, including Jewish candidate Brad Lander, who is running for Congress. During the rally, Mamdani invoked the words of Italian anti-fascist philosopher Antonio Gramsci, citing his famous quote, “Now is the time of monsters.” According to Mamdani, this reference was meant to highlight the role of entities like AIPAC in obstructing progress and maintaining an unjust status quo. He argued that these organizations are responsible for perpetuating policies that harm vulnerable populations in New York City.

Despite Mamdani’s explanation, some of his Jewish supporters expressed discomfort with the term "monsters." Rabbi Jill Jacobs, head of the progressive rabbinic human rights group T'ruah, noted that such language could invoke antisemitic tropes that reduce individuals or groups to sub-human status. She emphasized that while opposing policies is important, dehumanizing opponents risks reinforcing harmful stereotypes.

Rabbi Misha Shulman, a Mamdani supporter and leader of the progressive Brooklyn synagogue The New Shul, acknowledged that the mayor’s comments were troubling. Although he did not find the term "monsters" itself to be the most concerning aspect, he pointed to Mamdani’s characterization of AIPAC as a "dark money" group as more problematic. This label typically refers to politically active organizations that obscure their donors, which AIPAC does not do. Shulman viewed this as a tactical misstep, especially given the current climate of rising antisemitism.

Mamdani reiterated his stance during a subsequent press conference, clarifying that his use of the term was not limited to AIPAC alone. However, he specifically criticized the lobbying group for supporting a status quo he deemed immoral. He suggested that AIPAC’s influence is detrimental to efforts aimed at addressing social issues in New York City, although he did not provide specific connections between AIPAC and local poverty levels.

The rally also featured strong criticisms of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his management of the conflict in Gaza. Mamdani accused AIPAC of prioritizing the continuation of Netanyahu’s policies over democratic processes and peace efforts. He contended that the organization’s financial strategies are designed to divide the public rather than foster unity among citizens.

Senator Bernie Sanders echoed Mamdani’s sentiments, emphasizing the impact of AIPAC funding on U.S. foreign policy. Both speakers urged the audience to support candidates who align with their progressive values, highlighting the importance of challenging entrenched interests in politics.

Despite the contentious nature of Mamdani’s remarks, he concluded his speech with a message of inclusivity and shared values among diverse communities in New York City. He appealed to Jewish voters and others, stressing common ground based on mutual goals for the city’s future. His call for unity underscored the complexity of navigating political discourse while addressing sensitive topics related to identity and advocacy.

As the debate continues, the responses from Mamdani’s Jewish allies reflect the nuanced challenges faced by progressive leaders in articulating critiques without inadvertently contributing to divisive narratives. The situation highlights ongoing tensions within the progressive movement regarding how to address complex geopolitical issues while maintaining solidarity with Jewish communities.