The Serbian National Council (SNV) has sent an open letter to the management of Hrvatska Radiotelevizija (HRT), expressing concern over the appearance of historian Mario Jareb on HRT's radio program. The SNV claims that editor Mislav Togonol allowed Jareb to present a revisionist account of the uprising in Serbia, which they describe as false and damaging to the institution of public service. In their letter, the SNV states that this development is a step towards a boycott of the public service, emphasizing that Croatia was founded in opposition to the Independent State of Croatia (NDH). They criticize Jareb for asserting that Serbs led the uprising against the NDH, claiming there were few communists involved and that they collaborated with Italian occupying forces. The SNV also points out that Jareb did not mention the Ustasha crimes preceding the uprising. As a response, the SNV organized a public forum on the events related to the uprising in Serbia, featuring historians Milan Radanović, Igor Mrkalj, and Ivo Goldstein.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the SNV's perspective, which criticizes the revisionist narrative presented by historian Mario Jareb on HRT. The framing emphasizes the SNV's concerns about historical accuracy and the potential damage to public service institutions, suggesting a left-leaning emphasis on the Ust
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a statement from the SRPSKO Narodno Vijeće (SNV) criticizing HRT for allowing historian Marija Jareb to present revisionist views on the uprising in Serbia. It references specific claims made by Jareb and mentions the SNV's response through an open letter. While no primary sou
Why objectivity (60): The tone of the article is clearly critical of the SNV's position and presents the SNV's concerns as justified, while also highlighting the controversy around Jareb's statements. There is a clear bias toward the SNV's perspective, with emotionally charged language like 'sramotno gostovanje' (shamefu





