A moderate earthquake with a magnitude of 3.1 on the Richter scale struck Bosnia and Herzegovina around midday on Thursday, July 29, 2026, according to data from the European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC). The tremor was felt in parts of Croatia’s Dubrovnik region, including the city itself, and was described by residents as brief and weak. The epicenter was located approximately 50 kilometers from Dubrovnik, 35 kilometers south-southeast of Mostar, and four kilometers south-southeast of Stolac. This information was shared across multiple local media outlets, including Index.hr, N1 Hrvatska, and Jutarnji list. The seismic activity began shortly after 4:21 local time, with the epicenter situated 12 kilometers east of Sarajevo at a depth of six kilometers. According to reports, the tremor was felt in Sarajevo and surrounding areas, with over 490 users reporting their experiences on the EMSC platform. One user from Lukavica described the sensation as “osjetno podrhtavanje, čuo se i zvuk” (“noticeable shaking, heard and felt”), while another from Kobilja Glava noted, “Kratko, ali jako. Centar Sarajeva” (“short, but strong. Center of Sarajevo”). These accounts were echoed by other residents who described the event as a sudden, though not severe, disturbance. In addition to the main tremor near Sarajevo, there was a separate quake of similar magnitude recorded earlier in the day, around 14:00, affecting southern Bosnia and Herzegovina. This second event had its epicenter 10 kilometers east of Sarajevo, also at a depth of six kilometers. Residents in nearby towns such as Vogošće, Ilidža, and Kobilja Glava reported feeling the tremors, with some noting that the shaking caused objects to move or even wake them from sleep. One resident wrote, “Zadrmalo fino” (“fine trembling”), while another described the experience as “Blago se zatresao ormar” (“the cabinet slightly shook”). In Sarajevo, one person remarked, “Kratko, ali jako zaljuljalo” (“short, but strongly shaken”), highlighting the localized impact of the quakes. The tremors were also felt in parts of southern Croatia, particularly in the Dubrovnik area. Reports from tportal indicated that the shaking was noticeable in the region, with some residents describing it as “Nije svejedno” (“not insignificant”) due to the area's known seismic sensitivity. Others commented on the sound associated with the tremor, noting that it was audible and accompanied by a distinct rumbling. Despite the widespread perception of the event, there have been no official reports of damage or injuries so far. Multiple sources confirmed the location and timing of the earthquakes, with slight variations in the exact distances and depths cited. For instance, tportal stated that the epicenter was eight kilometers southeast of Stolac and 39 kilometers from Mostar, whereas Index.hr placed it four kilometers southeast of Stolac and 35 kilometers from Mostar. These minor discrepancies reflect the nature of crowd-sourced seismic data, which can vary based on individual observations rather than centralized measurements. Nevertheless, all reports concur that the quakes were relatively mild and did not result in any immediate casualties or structural harm. Local authorities and emergency services have not issued any alerts or statements regarding the events, indicating that they are currently assessing the situation. As of now, there are no indications of further seismic activity, and the region remains stable. Residents continue to share their experiences online, contributing to the ongoing documentation of the event through social media and dedicated platforms like EMSC. The data collected will likely be used for future analysis and monitoring of seismic patterns in the area.
15 reports
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 904 days agoA minor earthquake of magnitude 3.1 on the Richter scale struck Bosnia and Herzegovina today around noon. The tremor was felt in the Dubrovnik area as well. According to data from the European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC), the epicenter was nearly 50 kilometers from Dubrovnik, 35 kilometers southeast of Mostar, and four kilometers southeast of Stolac. Citizens reported brief shaking lasting a few seconds, with some describing it as a light tremor.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a natural disaster event with minimal political context or framing. It focuses on factual information such as the earthquake's magnitude, location, and citizen reactions without any apparent ideological slant or emphasis on political implications.
Why factuality (95): The article is nearly identical to the primary source, providing accurate magnitudes, distances, and depth. It correctly attributes the event to Bosnia and Herzegovina and reports the effects on Dubrovnik. No discrepancies are noted.
Why objectivity (90): The tone is neutral and factual, with no signs of bias or emotional language. It simply reports the event based on available data and public comments.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 904 days agoNa podne Bosni i Hercegovini dogodio se potres magnituda 3,1 po Richterovoj skali, a podrhtavanje tla osjetilo se i na dubrovačkom području. Prema podacima Europsko-mediteranskog seizmološkog centra (EMSC), epicentar potresa bio je oko četiri kilometra jugoistočno od Stoca, 35 kilometara jugoistočno od Mostara i približno 50 kilometara od Dubrovnika. Građani su na stranici EMSC-a prijavili da je podrhtavanje bilo kratko i slabo, s komentarima poput 'slabo podrhtavanje u trajanju od nekoliko sekundi', 'kratko se zatreslo' i 'Dubrovnik, lagano zadrmalo'.
Bias read (Center): Vijest o potresu nije politički nabit, ali je izvještaj osjetljiv jer se događaj dogodio u regiji koja ima povijesne i kulturne značajke. Vijest se fokusira na opisivanje događaja bez evidentnog političkog slanja ili kritike. Izvor informacija je objektivan (EMSC), a komentari građana su neutralni i
Why factuality (95): This article is almost verbatim to the primary source, with minor variations in phrasing. It accurately reports the magnitude, location, and depth of the earthquake and includes public comments as described in the primary source.
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the event without any subjective interpretation. It reports the facts clearly and concisely.
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 904 days agoA minor earthquake measuring 3.1 on the Richter scale shook Bosnia and Herzegovina, with tremors felt in the Dubrovnik area. According to data from the EMSC, the epicenter was approximately 50 kilometers away from Dubrovnik, 35 kilometers south-southeast of Mostar, and 4 kilometers south-southeast of Stoca. Residents described the sensation as a 'weak shaking lasting a few seconds' and 'brief trembling,' with some noting that Dubrovnik experienced a light shudder. The report highlights the localized impact of the seismic event but does not mention any significant damage or casualties.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about an earthquake without taking a political stance. It reports on the scientific data and local reactions without emphasizing ideological positions or partisan perspectives. The tone remains neutral, focusing on the natural event rather than any political,
Why factuality (95): The article is very close to the primary source, with only slight differences in wording. It accurately describes the magnitude, location, and depth of the earthquake and includes public comments as reported in the primary source.
Why objectivity (90): The tone is neutral and factual, with no emotional language or bias. It presents the event in a clear and unbiased manner.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 904 days agoA magnitude 3.1 earthquake was recorded on the Richter scale, with its epicenter eight kilometers from Stoca and 39 kilometers from Mostar, at a depth of six kilometers. The tremor was felt in parts of Bosnia and Herzegovina and also in southern Dalmatia in Croatia, particularly around Dubrovnik, which is located in a seismically sensitive area. Residents described the shaking as brief but noticeable, with some commenting that it was significant enough to feel. As of now, there are no reports of material damage or injuries.
Bias read (Center): The article provides factual information about an earthquake without taking a political stance. It reports on the event's location, intensity, and effects without emphasizing any particular political viewpoint or agenda. The focus remains on scientific and geographical data rather than ideological,党
Why factuality (95): This article closely mirrors the primary source document, including exact magnitudes, distances, and depths. It references EMSC and provides precise coordinates. All factual claims are supported and match the primary source without deviation.
Why objectivity (90): The article is highly objective, presenting the event in a straightforward manner without emotional language or editorializing. It focuses solely on the facts and reports public reactions neutrally.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 802 days agoA magnitude 3.1 earthquake struck near Sarajevo early Wednesday morning, according to the European Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC). The tremor was recorded at 4:21 AM, with the epicenter approximately 10 kilometers east of Sarajevo and occurring at a depth of six kilometers. Residents in nearby areas reported feeling the shaking, with some describing it as 'fine trembling' and others noting that it woke them up or caused furniture to move. While there were no reports of material damage or injuries, the event was noted on social media platforms where citizens shared their experiences.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a natural event without taking a political stance. It reports on the scientific data provided by EMSC and includes citizen accounts without apparent ideological framing. There is no indication of favoring any particular political group or agenda.
Why factuality (85): The article reports the earthquake as occurring early in the morning near Sarajevo, which is slightly different from the primary source’s description of the event being centered around Mostar and Stoca. However, it still aligns with EMSC data and does not introduce major inaccuracies.
Why objectivity (80): The tone is slightly more descriptive, with some emphasis on the personal experiences of residents, which could be interpreted as a mild editorial angle. Nonetheless, it remains largely objective.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 802 days ago An earthquake of magnitude 3.1 near SarajevoA magnitude 3.1 earthquake was recorded early Monday morning east of Sarajevo, according to the European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC). The tremor occurred at 4:21 local time, with the epicenter located 12 kilometers east of Sarajevo at a depth of six kilometers. Many residents of Sarajevo and surrounding areas felt the shaking, with over 490 EMSC users reporting the event and nearly 200 comments from citizens on their platform. Residents described the sensation as noticeable, with some noting they heard sounds and felt the shake in the city center. There are currently no reports of injuries or material damage.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a natural event without overt ideological framing. It focuses on scientific data provided by the EMSC and includes citizen reactions without taking a partisan stance. The tone remains neutral, providing balanced reporting without leaning toward any side
Why factuality (85): The article reports the earthquake near Sarajevo with magnitude 3.1, matching the primary source document's mention of a 3.1 magnitude quake felt in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Dubrovnik area. It provides specific details like time, location, depth, and user comments, aligning with EMSC data. However
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, reporting facts and including citizen reactions without apparent bias. The article avoids emotional language but includes some subjective descriptions like 'osjetno podrhtavanje' and 'zvuk', which could be seen as slightly emotive.
Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 852 days agoNa dan 29. srpnja 2026., u 4:21 sati, zapisa je potres magnitude 3,1 po Richterovoj skali, s epicentrom oko 12 km istočno od Sarajeva, na dubini od 6 km. Potešak je osjetio broj nekoliko stanovnika Sarajeva i okolice, koji su objavili svoja iskustva na stranicama Europsko-mediteranskog seizmološkog centra (EMSC). Nema prijave ozlijeđenih osoba ili materijalne štete. EMSC je objavio poruku na Twitteru zaštita potresa, pozivajući javnost da prijavi osjećaje putem poveznica koje je dao. Napomena je da je ovo automatska detekcija, a ne potvrđeno seizmički.
Bias read (Center): Vijest je neutralna i fokusira se na tehničke podatke o potresu, bez političkog okreta. Izvor podataka je objektivan (EMSC), a tekst ne pokazuje ni lijevi ni desni naglasak. Sadržaj je informativan i opisuje događaj bez vrednovanja ili stvaranja konteksta koji bi mogao dovesti do političkog naglaska
Why factuality (80): The article reports the earthquake as occurring early in the morning near Sarajevo, which conflicts slightly with the primary source that places the epicenter closer to Mostar and Stoca. However, it still aligns with EMSC data and does not introduce major inaccuracies.
Why objectivity (85): The tone is neutral, though there is a slight emphasis on the impact of the earthquake in Sarajevo, which could be seen as a minor editorial tilt. Overall, it remains balanced.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 852 days ago The earthquake shook I would say, 'It struck briefly, but hard'A magnitude 3.1 earthquake was recorded early Monday morning east of Sarajevo, according to the European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC). The tremor occurred at approximately 4:21 local time, with the epicenter located 12 kilometers east of Sarajevo at a depth of six kilometers. Many residents in Sarajevo and surrounding areas felt the quake, with some describing it as a brief but strong shaking. One user from Lukavica reported feeling the tremor and hearing a sound, while another from Kobilja Glava described it as 'short but very strong.' As of now, there are no reports of injuries or material damage.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a natural event without taking a political stance. It provides objective data from a scientific source (EMSC) and includes eyewitness accounts without editorializing. There is no indication of ideological framing or emphasis on specific political groups
Why factuality (80): The article reports the earthquake as occurring early in the morning near Sarajevo, which is slightly different from the primary source’s description of the event being centered around Mostar and Stoca. However, it still aligns with EMSC data and does not introduce major inaccuracies.
Why objectivity (85): The tone is neutral, though there is a slight emphasis on the impact of the earthquake in Sarajevo, which could be seen as a minor editorial tilt. Overall, it remains balanced.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 854 days ago The earthquake struck Herzegovina, and was felt in southern CroatiaA moderate earthquake of magnitude 3.1 on the Richter scale struck the southern part of Bosnia and Herzegovina on Monday at 2:00 PM. The epicenter was located 39 kilometers southeast of Mostar, or eight kilometers southeast of Stoc, at a depth of 6.3 kilometers. Due to the relatively shallow depth of the epicenter, ground shaking could be felt in surrounding areas, including parts of southern Croatia. Residents of Dubrovnik and Župa dubrovačka reported feeling the tremor. There are currently no reports of material damage or injured individuals.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual account of an earthquake event, focusing on geographical details, the depth of the epicenter, and the regions affected. It does not present any overtly biased language, nor does it emphasize political implications or take a stance on the event itself. The information,
Why factuality (80): The article correctly identifies the magnitude 3.1 earthquake affecting Bosnia and Herzegovina and notes its effect on southern Croatia. It uses EMSC data and matches the primary source’s descriptions of distance and depth. No significant inaccuracies are present.
Why objectivity (85): The tone remains neutral, presenting the event without emotional language or bias. Public comments are reported fairly, and no attempt is made to influence the reader’s perception.
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 75yesterday A 3.6 magnitude earthquake has shaken Sisak and the surrounding area.A magnitude 3.6 earthquake was felt in central Croatia early today at 6:29 AM, with the epicenter recorded six kilometers southeast of Sisak, approximately 56 kilometers from Zagreb, at a depth of nine kilometers. Residents in Sisak and surrounding areas reported feeling a short but fairly strong tremor accompanied by a rumbling sound. The event is considered minor and does not pose significant risk.
Bias read (Center): The article reports a natural disaster event without taking a political stance. It provides factual information about the earthquake, including location, time, magnitude, and local reactions, without emphasizing any particular political viewpoint or agenda.
Why factuality (65): The article reports a 3.7 magnitude earthquake near Siska, again differing from the primary source's 3.1 magnitude quake in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It provides similar details to the previous article but adds more specifics about location relative to Zagreb. It still misses key locations from the pr
Why objectivity (75): The tone remains relatively neutral, presenting facts and including citizen feedback. It uses descriptive language like 'dobro se osjetilo' and 'jaka trešnja', which could be considered slightly emotive but not overly biased.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 60Objective 70yesterdayA moderate earthquake with a magnitude of 3.6 on the Richter scale struck near Sisak today at 6:29 AM, according to the Seismological Service. The quake had an intensity of IV on the EMS scale at its epicenter. Residents reported feeling strong shaking, with some describing the experience as if a bomb had exploded followed by a long rumble. Others mentioned the sensation of their homes trembling. The incident has been tagged with hashtags related to the earthquake and the Sisak-Moslavina County.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a natural disaster event without any political commentary, framing, or bias. It focuses solely on the factual details of the earthquake and includes witness accounts without taking a stance or emphasizing any particular perspective.
Why factuality (60): The article mentions a 3.6 magnitude earthquake near Siska, which is different from the primary source document's 3.1 magnitude quake in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It provides some geographical details but omits key locations like Dubrovnik, Mostara, and Stoca mentioned in the primary source.
Why objectivity (70): The tone is generally neutral, focusing on reporting the event and including citizen accounts. However, it uses somewhat dramatic language like 'poprilično snažan udar uz tutnjavu', which may lean towards emotional description.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 657 days ago A powerful earthquake awakens Austrians: It caused rock erosion and was felt as far away as ViennaA strong earthquake measuring 4.5 on the Richter scale struck the Semmering area in Austria at 1:59 AM on August 24, 2026. The tremors were felt in Vienna and parts of Lower Austria and Styria. The epicenter was located eight kilometers southwest of Glunten and 15 kilometers east of Murzzuschlau in Styria, with the hypocenter at a depth of four kilometers. Seismologists warn that minor damages could occur in the affected area, and initial effects have already been recorded. Austrian media reported that the earthquake caused a rockslide on a road between Schottwin and Breitenstein in the Neunkirchen district. Small pieces of stone fell onto the roadway, prompting firefighters to remove the debris and restore normal traffic flow. As of now, there are no reports of injuries or significant material damage. Authorities continue to monitor the situation in the affected region.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a natural disaster without overt ideological framing. It focuses on scientific data provided by the Geosphere Austria seismic institute and reports on the immediate consequences without taking a partisan stance. While the event has political relevance (
Why factuality (60): The article reports a magnitude 4.5 earthquake in Austria, but the primary source documents an earthquake of magnitude 3.1 near Bosnia and Herzegovina. This discrepancy significantly reduces factual accuracy. The article also mentions damage and rockfalls, which are not mentioned in the primary sour
Why objectivity (65): The tone is somewhat sensationalist, using phrases like 'snažan potres' and mentioning rockfalls, which may imply more impact than actually occurred. However, it remains relatively neutral in reporting the event.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 20Objective 303 days ago An earthquake measuring 7.1 on the Richter scale has struck JapanAn earthquake measuring 7.1 on the Richter scale struck Japan. The event has raised concerns among experts due to Japan's history of seismic activity and its preparedness protocols. Authorities have issued advisories and are monitoring the situation closely. While there are no immediate reports of casualties or major damage, the incident highlights the ongoing risks associated with living in a seismically active region.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about an earthquake without overtly emphasizing political perspectives or agendas. It focuses on the natural disaster itself and related safety measures, which aligns with a balanced reporting approach.
Why factuality (20): This article incorrectly reports an earthquake of magnitude 7.1 hitting Japan, which is completely unrelated to the primary source document about a 3.1 magnitude quake in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It contains no relevant information about the actual event described in the primary source.
Why objectivity (30): The article is clearly misleading and lacks any connection to the actual event. It uses sensationalist language and presents false information without any attempt at balance or correction.
Večernji listIndependentCenter4 hr. ago The earthquake hit the area of Naples: no electricity, things falling from the shelvesA strong earthquake measuring 4.3 on the Richter scale struck southern Italy on July 31, 2026, at 7:46 PM local time, with the epicenter located approximately 13 kilometers west of Naples. The tremor lasted over 20 seconds and was described by residents as extremely powerful, causing power outages, objects falling from shelves, and shaking of furniture. While there are currently no reports of material damage or injuries, authorities continue to monitor the situation. Residents shared their experiences through comments on the European-Mediterranean Seismological Centre (EMSC) platform, describing the unsettling effects of the quake but noting no physical harm. No official sources were cited in the article, and the focus remains on the immediate impact rather than broader implications.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a natural disaster without overt ideological framing. It focuses on the seismic event itself, quoting residents' accounts and citing data from the EMSC. There is no evident political agenda or emphasis on specific policies, parties, or governance structures.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenteryesterday The Siska earthquakeAn earthquake measuring 3.7 on the Richter scale struck the Sisak area early Thursday morning, according to the European-Mediterranean Seismological Center (EMSC). The quake occurred at 6:29 AM, with the epicenter located six kilometers southeast of Sisak, approximately 56 kilometers southeast of Zagreb. It was recorded at a depth of nine kilometers. Residents reported feeling the tremor through the EMSC app, describing it as 'well felt' and mentioning strong shaking in the center of Sisak. The report includes calls for opinions and invites readers to join discussions or read comments.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about an earthquake without taking a political stance. It reports on seismic activity, locations, and public reactions without commentary on governance, policy, or ideological positions. The framing remains neutral, focusing solely on scientific data and user
Croatia
