The Supreme Court has refused to waive the immunity of Piotr Schab on suspicion of slandering Waldemar Żurka.

Polsat NewsIndependentCenter11 hr. ago

The Supreme Court of Poland rejected a request to revoke the immunity of Piotr Schab, a disciplinary officer of judges appointed under the Law and Justice Party (PiS). The case originated from a press conference in May 2022 where Schab accused Waldemar Żurek, a former member of the National Council of the Judiciary, of falsifying court decisions by providing incorrect dates. Żurek responded by calling the matter a 'political maneuver' and claimed he had never committed any wrongdoing. The Supreme Court's ruling stated that while Schab made a legal error during the briefing, the issue of date accuracy in civil proceedings was not central to the case, and thus Schab's actions did not constitute a criminal offense. The decision highlights ongoing tensions between judicial figures and disciplinary authorities within the Polish judiciary.

Bias read (Center): While the article discusses a politically sensitive issue involving high-ranking judicial figures and potential conflicts of interest, the framing remains balanced. It presents both perspectives—Schab’s accusations against Żurek and Żurek’s defense—as well as the Supreme Court’s reasoning without明显的

RzeczpospolitaIndependentCenter14 hr. ago

In March 2024, the Supreme Court (SN) refused to lift the immunity of Judge Piotr Schab regarding allegations of misconduct involving Judge Waldemar Żurek. The case stems from a press conference held by Schab in May 2022, where he accused Żurek of falsifying dates on 64 court decisions during his tenure on the National Council of the Judiciary between 2012–2018. Żurek denied these claims, calling them a political smear campaign and asserting he had committed no wrongdoing. In March 2023, Żurek’s legal representative reported the matter to prosecutors, who initially declined to investigate but later accepted the case after judicial intervention. The investigation began in 2024, and in early 2026, the request to lift Schab’s immunity was submitted to the Supreme Court. In its ruling, the SN acknowledged that too much was said at the press conference but argued that Schab, as a criminal law judge, misunderstood civil law nuances, which are not central to his role.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the dispute—Schab’s accusations against Żurek and Żurek’s denial of wrongdoing. It includes direct quotes from both parties and provides background on the legal proceedings without overtly favoring one side. The Supreme Court’s reasoning is summarized neutrally, as