Info360IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 802 days agoA survey conducted by the Center for Socioinformatics at the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, reveals that 83% of Slovenian parents support a proposal to restrict social media usage for children under 15 years old. The research, involving 3,519 participants with 1,879 responding to questions about internet safety, indicates that parents view age restrictions primarily as a protective measure for children. Support remains high across different age groups, with 77% of parents of teenagers agreeing. While most see the restriction as a helpful tool rather than a replacement for parental responsibility, some express concerns about potential negative impacts on children’s online communication. The study also highlights a gap between knowledge of parental control features and their actual use, with many parents finding it difficult to manage platforms like TikTok and Snapchat. Experts emphasize that technical controls cannot replace active parental involvement, particularly in discussions with teenagers about online risks.
Bias read (Center): The article presents data from a survey showing broad public opinion but does not take a clear ideological stance. It reports findings without overtly favoring any political position, maintaining neutrality in framing the issue around parental concern and technological limitations rather than policy
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a survey conducted by the Center for Socioinformatics at the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, with 3,519 participants and 1,879 responses. It provides detailed statistics on parental support for age restrictions on social media usage, including percentages
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the survey results in a neutral manner, summarizing the findings without overtly promoting any particular viewpoint. However, there is a slight tendency to frame the results in a way that suggests parents generally understand the purpose of such measures, which may introduce a m
Si21IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 78yesterdayIn Slovenia and other EU countries, there has been ongoing discussion about introducing age limits for social media usage. A survey conducted by the Center for Socioinformatics at the University of Ljubljana Faculty of Social Sciences, in collaboration with Safe.si, revealed high support among parents for restricting access to social media for children under 15 years old. The study, based on data from the 12th wave of the 1KA probability internet panel, surveyed 3,519 individuals and included responses from 1,879 participants regarding internet safety. According to the findings, 83% of parents agree with the proposal to allow social media use starting at age 15. Support was highest among parents of children aged 0–5 years, followed by those of older children, though it remained relatively high across all age groups. Most parents viewed state-imposed restrictions as additional support rather than a replacement for their parental responsibility, while some expressed concerns about potential negative effects on children’s communication and online participation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents balanced reporting on a politically sensitive issue, age restrictions for social media access. It includes survey results showing broad parent support, but also acknowledges minority concerns. There is no overt ideological framing, and the focus remains on factual data and public
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a survey conducted by the Center for Socio-Informatics at the University of Ljubljana Faculty of Social Sciences, citing data from the 12th wave of the probabilistic internet panel 1KA. It provides specific statistics such as the sample size, response rates, and percentages su
Why objectivity (78): The article presents the findings of the survey in a balanced manner, quoting percentages and perspectives from parents and guardians. However, it leans slightly towards emphasizing the support for age restrictions, which may reflect a bias toward the topic being discussed rather than presenting an
Slovenia
