ON
← Back to feed
The Slovene left would give the right to vote to more than 100,000 foreigners.
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservativeyesterday

The Slovene left would give the right to vote to more than 100,000 foreigners.

The article discusses a debate between members of Slovenia's political parties regarding the voting rights of foreign residents. Dan Juvan from the Left Party argues that legal immigrants, such as cleaners, caregivers, cooks, and delivery workers, contribute significantly to the economy and society, and that restricting their residency or family unification would harm both them and the country. He criticizes policies that differentiate between EU citizens and those from other countries, noting that many non-EU migrants come from former Yugoslav states. In contrast, Andrej Kosi from the SDS highlights statistical data showing a significant increase in the number of foreigners with local voting rights, rising from around 15,000 in 2002 to over 100,000 today. He warns that this growing demographic could influence local elections by increasing the political power of non-citizens. The discussion also includes perspectives from activists and experts who caution against populist measures that divide society and highlight potential long-term risks of ignoring demographic changes.

Advertisement

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Zanima.me logoZanima.meIndependentConservativeyesterday
The Slovene left would give the right to vote to more than 100,000 foreigners.

The article discusses a debate between members of Slovenia's political parties regarding the voting rights of foreign residents. Dan Juvan from the Left Party argues that legal immigrants, such as cleaners, caregivers, cooks, and delivery workers, contribute significantly to the economy and society, and that restricting their residency or family unification would harm both them and the country. He criticizes policies that differentiate between EU citizens and those from other countries, noting that many non-EU migrants come from former Yugoslav states. In contrast, Andrej Kosi from the SDS highlights statistical data showing a significant increase in the number of foreigners with local voting rights, rising from around 15,000 in 2002 to over 100,000 today. He warns that this growing demographic could influence local elections by increasing the political power of non-citizens. The discussion also includes perspectives from activists and experts who caution against populist measures that divide society and highlight potential long-term risks of ignoring demographic changes.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the issue through a focus on the numerical growth of non-citizen voters and potential political influence, emphasizing concerns about national identity and democratic integrity. It leans toward the right by highlighting fears of non-citizens' impact on local governance and using a

Info360 logoInfo360IndependentCenter2 days ago
Are we already threatened by aliens?

On September 17, 2026, at 6:00 AM, a debate was held on Info360's program 'V Središču' ahead of a consultative referendum on a law amendment that would revoke voting rights for foreigners from third countries in November local elections. The discussion featured Ajgul Hakimova, a long-time activist who migrated from Kyrgyzstan to Slovenia over 20 years ago, former politician and political commentator Bogdan Biščak, MP of SDS Andrej Kosić, and legal expert Janez Pogorelec, member of NSi. The conversation included contentious discussions on whether revoking voting rights would lead to fewer foreign workers or support staff in Ljubljana's UKC. The interview was conducted by journalist Suzana Kos.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion involving multiple stakeholders with differing perspectives on the proposed law amendment. While the topic is politically charged, the framing appears neutral, with participants representing various viewpoints without overt ideological slant. The focus is a

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories