Dinamo Zagreb's decision to bench Monsef Bakrar during their 1:1 draw with Thun in the second round of the Champions League qualifiers has raised questions among fans and analysts alike. Despite being one of the club’s key players, Bakrar did not feature in the match, even though Dinamo was trailing for much of the game. The absence of the Algerian forward, who had been expected to play a crucial role, has sparked speculation about the reasons behind his omission. The situation appears to stem from a contractual clause tied to Bakrar's deal with New York City FC. According to reports, the clause stipulates that if Bakrar were to make his tenth European appearance during his current contract period, Dinamo would have to pay an additional $100,000 to New York City. Bakrar already made nine appearances in the Europa League last season, meaning that playing against Thun would have triggered the clause. Given that his departure from Dinamo seems imminent, rumored to be moving to Egyptian side Al Ahly for around €3 million, the club opted to avoid the extra cost. This financial consideration appears to have taken precedence over tactical decisions. Coach Marija Kovačević did not bring Bakrar into the game despite Dinamo's need for a goal, instead opting for substitutes such as Fran Topić and Lucas Kačavenda. Topić's late contribution led to the equalizer through Mihal Zajc, securing a draw that will likely benefit Dinamo in the return leg at Maksimir. Bakrar arrived at Dinamo last summer from New York City for approximately €1 million. He quickly became a vital part of the team, making 42 appearances last season and scoring 18 goals while adding seven assists. His performances were particularly notable after Mateo Lisica suffered from mononucleosis, which saw Bakrar emerge as the primary option on the right flank. However, with Lisica now back in action, Bakrar's position within the squad has become less secure. Despite his contributions, Bakrar is now reportedly on the verge of leaving Dinamo. The club is expected to finalize his move to Al Ahly soon, and the decision to keep him on the bench against Thun suggests that management is prioritizing cost savings ahead of the transfer. This approach could prevent further financial obligations to New York City, especially since Bakrar might still be available for the return fixture, depending on the club's strategy. Meanwhile, another player has emerged as a potential target for Dinamo and other clubs. Slovenian defender Matija Kuzmić, currently playing for Danish side Viborg, has attracted interest from several top-tier teams. Kuzmić, 22 years old, recently earned his first start for Slovenia under new coach Boštjan Cesar, signaling his growing importance in the national team setup. His versatility, able to play both right-back and center-back positions, makes him an attractive prospect for clubs looking to strengthen their defensive lines. Viborg, where Kuzmić has spent the past year, is entering a critical phase as the player’s contract is set to expire in a year. The Danish club expects a substantial fee for his services, potentially upwards of €1 million. Earlier discussions between Dinamo and Viborg had stalled due to financial discrepancies, with Viborg initially demanding €2.5 million and Dinamo offering up to €1.3 million. However, recent developments suggest that the market value of Kuzmić has risen significantly. Interest in Kuzmić has expanded beyond Dinamo. French Ligue 1 side Toulouse, owned by American investment fund RedBird, has shown interest, as has Nottingham Forest, a Premier League club controlled by Greek billionaire Evangelos Marinakis. The latter's ownership also includes Olympiacos and Portuguese club Rio Ave, indicating a broader network of potential suitors. A move to the Premier League would represent a major step forward for Kuzmić, elevating his career to one of football’s most competitive leagues. With multiple clubs showing interest, Kuzmić’s future looks increasingly uncertain. While Dinamo had previously pursued him, the emergence of stronger financial offers from higher-profile clubs complicates the situation. If Nottingham Forest makes a serious bid, Kuzmić could find himself heading to England, marking a significant shift in his professional trajectory. For now, however, the focus remains on whether Dinamo can secure a deal that aligns with both its financial constraints and sporting ambitions.
3 reports
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8010 days agoDinamo je u prvoj utakmici drugog pretkola Lige prvaka igrao neriješeno 1:1 na gostovanju kod Thuna, a jedno od najzanimljivijih pitanja nakon utakmice bilo je zašto je Alžirski napadalač Monsef Bakrar ostao cijelo vrijeme na klupi. Iako je Dinamo od 20. minute bio u zaostatku, Bakrar nije ušao u igru. Sport Klub navodi da je razlog njegova izostanka iz igre vezan uz klauzulu iz ugovora prema kojoj bi Dinamo moralo platiti New York Cityju dodatnih 100.000 dolara ako bi Bakrar upisao deseti europski nastup u aktualnom ugovornom razdoblju. Budući da je Bakrar prošle sezone odigrao devet utakmica u Europskoj ligi, njegov nastup protiv Thuna bi automatiski bio deseti i aktivirao taj bonus. Međutim, jer je njegov transfer u Al Ahly predviđen, Dinamo je odlučilo izbjeći dodatne troškove. U završnici su ušli Fran Topić i Lukas Kačavendu, dok je Bakrar ostao na klupi. Njegovo izostanak iz igre objašnjen je kao strategija kako bi se izbjegao bonus bivšem klubu.
Bias read (Center): The article discusses a sports-related decision regarding player selection in a football match, which does not involve political issues, ideologies, or public policy. The framing focuses on contractual clauses and team strategy rather than any ideological stance. As such, the content is apolitical,
Why factuality (85): The article explains why Bakrar did not play, citing the contract clause related to the additional payment if he reached ten European appearances. This aligns with the consensus from other sources.
Why objectivity (80): The tone is neutral and factual, explaining the decision based on contractual obligations. It avoids emotional language and presents the situation objectively.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7513 days agoAlžirski napadac Monsef Bakrar, koji je bio u procesu transfera iz Hrvatskog Dinama u egipatski Al Ahly, dobio je iznenadnu ponudu od španjolskog prvoligaša Getafea. Getafe je ponudio fiksnu nagradu od 3,5 milijuna eura, trogodišnji ugovor s opcijom produženja na četvrtu sezonu i godišnju plaću od 1,2 milijuna eura. Transfer s Al Ahlyjem bio je već dogovoren, ali Dinamo je odgodio potpisivanje ugovora kako bi zadržao Bakrara dok se ne odigraju utakmice protiv švicarskog Thuna u kvalifikacijama za Ligu prvaka. Iako je ponuda Getafea finansijski privlačna, Bakrar još uvijek preferira Al Ahly zbog sportskog projekta, mogućnosti igre u kontinentalnim natjecanjima i ambicija kluba. Situacija se komplikirala jer je Getafe pružio Dinamu konkretan izbor za bolju zaradu.
Bias read (Center): Činjenica da je transfer bio u procesu i da su različiti klubovi pokušavali da dobiju Bakrara može se smatrati politički relevantnom, ali članak ne prikazuje jasno straničan pristup. Uglavnom se opisuje situacija bez evidentnog slanja poruke u jednom smjeru. Nema jasno izražene strane ili izraženog
Why factuality (85): Article reports on Monsef Bakrar’s potential transfer from Dinamo to Al Ahly, citing an exclusive source from Africafoot. It mentions a new offer from Getafe and details the previous agreement with Al Ahly. While there is no primary source, the information aligns with cross-source consensus regardin
Why objectivity (75): The article presents the transfer situation with some bias towards Al Ahly, emphasizing Bakrar’s preference for them despite financial offers from Getafe. There is a slight editorial tone when discussing his personal desires and the club’s stance.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 605 days agoSlovenski desni bek Srdan Kuzmić, koji je razvijao svoju karijeru u danskom Viborgu, privukao je interes više klubova, uključujući hrvatskog prvaka Dinamo, francuskog Toulousea i engleskog Nottingham Foresta. Kuzmić, 22-godišnji igrač koji je prošao Iliriju i Muru, 2023. godine otišao je u Viborg, gdje je bio opisan kao desnonogog braniča koji može igrati na obje bekovske pozicije. Dinamo je prethodno imalo interes, ali nije uspjelo završiti transfer. Viborg sada ima jednu od posljednjih prilika da zaradi odštetu od oko milijun eura. Klubovi kao što su Toulouse i Nottingham Forest, koji su pod vlasništvom američkog fonda RedBird i grčkog milijardera Evangelosa Marinakisa, sada su uključeni u trgu. Transfer u Premier ligu bi bio ogroman korak naprijed za Kuzmića, a njegova reprezentativna performansa i profil ga čine privlačnim za klubove iz jačih liga.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on sports-related content regarding a football player's potential transfer, which is considered apolitical. The narrative remains neutral, presenting facts about the player's development, interest from various clubs, and financial aspects without taking a clear ideological stance
Why factuality (70): This article shifts focus to other players like Kristijan Jakić and continues the transfer saga around Dominik Livaković, which is unrelated to the primary source document. It includes speculative information and lacks alignment with the primary source content about Kuzmić.
Why objectivity (60): The article presents information in a biased manner, focusing on ongoing rumors and speculation rather than offering a balanced perspective. It leans towards reporting on the uncertain future of Livaković without clear neutrality.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Croatia
