A divorced mother, a doctor at the UKC Ljubljana, shared a touching post on the anniversary of the death of her 13-year-old son
A young doctor at the University Children's Hospital in Ljubljana, Anne Gorbunova, shared a deeply emotional post on social media commemorating the death of her nearly 13-year-old son, Arsentiy, who was killed by a train accident one year prior. The incident occurred on September 6th of the previous year when Arsentiy was playing near the railway tracks near Park Kodeljevo. According to Gorbunova, the train struck him directly in the left occipital region, resulting in immediate death. She detailed the circumstances, noting that the train had come around a bend and that Arsentiy was likely not aware of its approach. He had returned to retrieve a forgotten pocketknife after playing with friends, which led to the tragedy. Gorbunova expressed frustration over conflicting accounts of the event and revealed that some narratives were painful for her family. She emphasized that her son did not act intentionally and that he understood the dangers, but had underestimated the risk and made a mistake. She concluded by stating that she does not blame her child for his death and would comfort him if he were alive.
A mother’s emotional account of her son's death after being struck by a train in Ljubljana has surfaced on social media one year after the tragedy. The incident occurred on September 6, 2025, near the Kodeljevo park, where a nearly 13-year-old boy was killed when a speeding train hit him. The boy, Arsentij, had been playing with friends along the railway tracks, searching for a spot to build a pool. According to his mother, Anne Gorbunova, a doctor at the University Clinical Center Ljubljana (UKC), the group had been looking for a secluded area to construct their project. They navigated through bushes, climbed up a bank adjacent to the rails, and found a small space where they began building the pool. Later that afternoon, they returned home for dinner and played games. Around 5 p.m., Arsentij accompanied his friends back to the location. Upon returning, the group discovered they had left behind a folding knife in the makeshift shelter. Arsentij decided to return to retrieve it. It was during this time that the tragic accident occurred. Police later determined that the fast-moving train approached from around a bend and likely caught Arsentij off guard. He was positioned approximately at the height of a bicycle frame, facing away from the track and the train, standing on the edge of the platform, possibly holding the knife. The train’s braking system extended nearly a meter outward, reaching the level of the platform edges. The impact directly hit the left rear section of Arsentij’s body, resulting in immediate fatality. His mother described the moment in detail, emphasizing that he had no headphones, did not look at his phone, and had an empty device. She expressed deep sorrow over the circumstances, noting that her son had always been cautious and aware of dangers, yet had made a fatal mistake. In a heartfelt message shared on social media, she acknowledged the painful misinformation surrounding the incident. She recounted how some had wrongly suggested that the boy had intentionally caused the accident, which deeply affected her family. “My son did not do this on purpose,” she wrote. “He made a mistake, but he is not irresponsible or foolish. One action, one second, one wrong decision cannot define his entire life.” She also mentioned that her son’s closest friend had struggled with guilt for months due to the forgotten knife, requiring time to accept the tragedy as an accident. Despite the pain, she emphasized that her son’s actions were not intentional, and that the error could not be undone. The incident took place on a poorly maintained stretch of rail in Ljubljana, where illegal crossings have become common among pedestrians seeking shortcuts. The area near Kodeljevo connects public parking and sports facilities through unofficial paths, making it a frequent route for young people. The lack of proper safety measures has led to several similar incidents in recent years, including multiple fatalities. One year later, the mother continues to share her grief, expressing love and longing for her son. She has written extensively about the tragedy, highlighting the fleeting nature of life and the enduring power of love. Her words serve as both a tribute and a warning, urging others to remain vigilant in potentially dangerous situations.
A mother has shared a detailed account of her nearly 13-year-old son’s tragic death after he was struck by a train while playing near railway tracks in Ljubljana. The incident occurred on September 6, 2025, when the boy was playing with friends who had been searching for a spot to build a pool. They had previously lost two pools due to damage on their property and were using the park area near the railway. The boy, named Arsentij, was reportedly holding a knife and was standing on the edge of the track, possibly unaware of the danger. According to the mother, the train, traveling at high speed, struck him directly, causing immediate fatal injuries. She expressed deep sorrow over the tragedy, emphasizing that her son did not intentionally cause his own death and was not reckless. She also noted the emotional impact on her son’s friend, who struggled with guilt over the knife, eventually coming to terms with the accident being a tragic accident rather than intentional harm.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident through the perspective of the grieving mother, highlighting the lack of safety awareness and potential negligence in the environment where the child played. While the event itself is a personal tragedy, the narrative emphasizes systemic issues such as inadequate rail
Why factuality (88): This article confirms the key facts from the first article, including the date, location, and cause of death. It also mentions the search for a hiding spot for a pool, the forgotten knife, and the police investigation into the accident. It maintains consistency with the other sources and does not in
Why objectivity (78): While the article conveys emotion through the mother’s perspective, it remains more focused on reporting the facts rather than indulging in excessive sentimentality. The language is still somewhat dramatic but less emotionally charged than the first article.
An article reports on the tragic death of a 13-year-old boy named Arsentiy who was killed by a train while playing near the tracks in Ljubljana. The boy’s mother, Anna Gorbunova, shared detailed accounts of the incident on social media, clarifying the circumstances and addressing misinformation. She described how the boy and his friends were playing near the tracks, using a knife, and failed to notice the approaching train. The mother emphasized that her son had made a mistake by being in a dangerous area and warned against similar behavior. The article also references previous concerns raised by Dnevnik about the unsafe conditions of railway crossings in Ljubljana, particularly around the Kodljevska area where illegal paths connect public spaces.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a tragic accident without overtly taking a political stance. While it highlights safety concerns related to railway infrastructure, which could be considered a public policy issue, the focus remains on the personal tragedy and the family's perspective. There
Why factuality (86): The article corroborates the timeline and circumstances of the incident, including the search for a hiding spot, the forgotten knife, and the police investigation. It matches the other articles in terms of factual content and does not contradict any established details. However, it cuts off mid-sent
Why objectivity (76): The tone is empathetic but still leans towards emotional expression, particularly in describing the mother’s reaction and the tragic nature of the event. While it doesn’t take a clear political or ideological stance, it presents the story through a personal lens, which can affect perceived neutralit
A young doctor at the University Children's Hospital in Ljubljana, Anne Gorbunova, shared a deeply emotional post on social media commemorating the death of her nearly 13-year-old son, Arsentiy, who was killed by a train accident one year prior. The incident occurred on September 6th of the previous year when Arsentiy was playing near the railway tracks near Park Kodeljevo. According to Gorbunova, the train struck him directly in the left occipital region, resulting in immediate death. She detailed the circumstances, noting that the train had come around a bend and that Arsentiy was likely not aware of its approach. He had returned to retrieve a forgotten pocketknife after playing with friends, which led to the tragedy. Gorbunova expressed frustration over conflicting accounts of the event and revealed that some narratives were painful for her family. She emphasized that her son did not act intentionally and that he understood the dangers, but had underestimated the risk and made a mistake. She concluded by stating that she does not blame her child for his death and would comfort him if he were alive.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a personal tragedy and the emotional response of a mother, rather than presenting a political stance or agenda. While the incident involves public infrastructure (railway safety), the narrative remains centered on the individual experience and does not engage in political pole
Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about the incident, including the date (6 September 2025), location (near Kodeljevo Park), cause of death (hit by train), and the mother’s account of events. It aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the child being hit by a train while playing nea
Why objectivity (75): The tone is emotionally charged, especially in the mother’s recounting of the tragedy. The article uses expressive language like 'most absurd coincidence' and emphasizes her personal loss, which leans toward an emotional narrative rather than a neutral report.
A passenger train struck a person on the tracks near Žalec, Slovenia, early on September 7, 2026. Emergency services, including firefighters from Žalec and Vrbje, responded to the incident. According to police reports, the collision was not classified as an accident or criminal act, and the individual involved survived. Firefighters evacuated 147 passengers and staff from the train, with no reported injuries. The affected passengers were provided with alternative transportation, and information was relayed through Savinjska Televizija. A total of 21 firefighters used five vehicles during the operation. Authorities are still investigating the circumstances and consequences of the incident. The article notes several similar incidents this year, some resulting in fatalities, highlighting ongoing concerns about safety on railway tracks.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report of a rail incident without overt ideological framing. While it mentions past incidents and calls for attention to safety, it does not take a clear partisan stance. The tone remains neutral, focusing on the event itself rather than advocating for specific policy,
Why factuality (75): The article reports the incident accurately, matching the primary source document regarding the number of passengers evacuated (147) and the involvement of 21 firefighters. However, it mentions '150 passengers' which slightly deviates from the exact figure given in the primary source. It also refere
Why objectivity (70): The tone remains neutral, focusing on reporting the facts without emotional language. However, the mention of 'več podobnih nesreč' (more similar accidents) could be seen as subtly emphasizing the frequency of such events, potentially influencing reader perception.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Slovenia-U53178531123vEM-1200x630%40diario_abc.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
