ON
← Back to feed
Library unions are calling for a boycott of books with AI illustrations
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive1 hr. ago

Library unions are calling for a boycott of books with AI illustrations

Two labor unions, Glosa and Zasuk, have called for libraries to boycott books illustrated using artificial intelligence (AI). They argue that public institutions funded by taxpayer money should support human creativity rather than AI-generated content, which they claim often lacks consistency, contains errors, and does not align well with the text. The unions also raise concerns about copyright issues, noting that AI systems rely on existing copyrighted material obtained from the internet. Additionally, they emphasize the importance of preserving Slovenia’s illustration tradition, citing notable Slovenian illustrators such as Marlenka Stupica and Hinko Smrekar. The unions stress that libraries play a crucial role in providing equal access to cultural and artistic resources for children and question the message sent to young people if AI shortcuts are used instead of supporting human artists. They clarify that they do not oppose authors or publishers selling AI-illustrated books but urge libraries not to purchase them with public funds.

5 reports

Žurnal24 logoŽurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6518 hr. ago
A call to libraries: Don't buy such books!

Two cultural unions in Slovenia, Glosa and Zasuk, have called on all libraries across the country to stop purchasing books, especially picture books illustrated by artificial intelligence. They argue that public institutions using taxpayer money should support human creativity and ensure children grow up surrounded by illustrations created with heart and soul. The unions claim AI-generated picture books, which are often priced similarly to those made by human illustrators, represent a violation of copyright laws. Additionally, they criticize AI-generated illustrations as generally low quality, inconsistent, and inaccurate. The unions emphasized the importance of preserving Slovenia’s rich cultural heritage and highlighted notable Slovenian illustrators and artists who have contributed significantly to the nation’s artistic legacy. They stated that libraries play a crucial role in protecting creativity by providing equal access to high-quality artistic works for all children.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a call from two cultural organizations urging libraries to avoid AI-generated content, emphasizing support for human creativity and copyright concerns. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of opposing viewpoints. The framing remains fact-l

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports the call from two syndicates for libraries to stop purchasing books illustrated by AI. It cites specific names of illustrators and provides context about the reasons behind the call. However, some details such as the exact nature of the copyright issues are not elabora

Why objectivity (65): The article has a clear stance against AI-generated illustrations and promotes human creativity, which introduces a degree of bias. While it presents facts, the tone is more opinionated and lacks neutrality in favoring human-created art over AI-generated work.

Mladina logoMladinaIndependentProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 60yesterday
Against books illustrated by artificial intelligence

The cultural and nature union Glosa, along with the creativity and culture union Zasuk, have called on all libraries in Slovenia to stop purchasing books, especially illustrated books created using artificial intelligence. The groups are concerned about the impact of AI-generated illustrations on the creative industry and cultural values. This call comes amid growing debates over the role of AI in art and intellectual property rights.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights a call by progressive cultural organizations to resist AI-generated content, which aligns with left-leaning concerns about technological disruption and the protection of human creativity. The framing emphasizes cultural preservation and resistance to corporate or technocratic

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (60): The article takes a clear position against AI-generated illustrations and supports human creativity, which introduces a noticeable bias. It lacks balance by not presenting counterarguments or perspectives that might challenge the stated position.

Večer logoVečerIndependent🔒Progressive1 hr. ago
Glossa and Zasuk urge libraries not to buy books with illustrations created by artificial intelligence

The cultural unions Glosa and Zasuk have called on libraries in Slovenia to stop purchasing books, especially picture books, illustrated by artificial intelligence. They argue that libraries, which are publicly funded institutions, should support human creativity and protect Slovenia's rich cultural heritage. The unions claim AI-generated illustrations are generally low quality, inconsistent, and often plagiarize the work of real illustrators. They emphasize that libraries should serve as role models for children and promote the work of genuine artists rather than opt for cheaper alternatives. The unions highlighted several renowned Slovenian illustrators and cartoonists whose legacy they believe should not be cheapened by the rise of AI-generated content.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a strong advocacy position favoring human-created art over AI-generated content, emphasizing cultural preservation and supporting local creators. It frames AI-generated illustrations negatively, suggesting they undermine both artistic integrity and economic fairness for human创作者

RTV Slovenija (MMC) logoRTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicProgressive3 hr. ago
Glossa and Zasuk libraries urged not to buy books with illustrations of artificial intelligence

Two cultural unions in Slovenia, Glosa and Zasuk, have called on all libraries across the country to stop purchasing books, especially picture books, illustrated by artificial intelligence. They argue that public institutions funded by taxpayer money should support human creativity and ensure children grow up surrounded by illustrations created with heart and soul. The unions claim AI-generated illustrations are of poor quality, inaccurate, and often violate copyright laws. They emphasize the importance of preserving Slovenia's rich cultural heritage and highlight the country's legendary illustrators and cartoonists. The unions believe that supporting human artists sets an important example for children and reinforces the value of creative work.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a call from two cultural unions advocating for the protection of human creativity and traditional illustration over AI-generated content. This aligns with progressive values emphasizing artistic integrity, cultural preservation, and the rights of human creators. The framing of '

24ur (POP TV) logo24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenter4 hr. ago
Library unions are calling for a boycott of books with AI illustrations

Two labor unions, Glosa and Zasuk, have called for libraries to boycott books illustrated using artificial intelligence (AI). They argue that public institutions funded by taxpayer money should support human creativity rather than AI-generated content, which they claim often lacks consistency, contains errors, and does not align well with the text. The unions also raise concerns about copyright issues, noting that AI systems rely on existing copyrighted material obtained from the internet. Additionally, they emphasize the importance of preserving Slovenia’s illustration tradition, citing notable Slovenian illustrators such as Marlenka Stupica and Hinko Smrekar. The unions stress that libraries play a crucial role in providing equal access to cultural and artistic resources for children and question the message sent to young people if AI shortcuts are used instead of supporting human artists. They clarify that they do not oppose authors or publishers selling AI-illustrated books but urge libraries not to purchase them with public funds.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the positions of two labor unions advocating for the preservation of human creativity and cultural heritage through public funding. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the unions' call,

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories