Union: 'New law does not eliminate discrimination against university teachers'

Večernji listIndependentCenter21 hr. ago

The article discusses concerns raised by academic staff at Croatian universities regarding proposed amendments to the Higher Education and Scientific Activity Act. According to Marko Gregurić, a senior lecturer at the Faculty of Teacher Education in Zagreb, the current law allows him only to be re-elected to the same position until retirement age, but does not provide opportunities for further career advancement such as becoming a senior lecturer advisor. The Science Union has warned that these changes fail to address long-standing discrimination against teaching staff who lack equal promotion prospects compared to their colleagues. Matija Kroflin, head of the Science Union, stated that the opportunity to correct this injustice was missed by the Ministry of Science, Education, and Youth. He emphasized that universities, rectors, deans, and the ministry have all contributed to this disparity despite there being no rational justification for it. Tanja Šestanj-Perić, a senior lecturer at the Faculty of Organization and Informatics in Zagreb, explained that teaching positions involve more teaching and less research compared to scientific-teaching roles. She clarified that teaching lect

Bias read (Center): The article presents perspectives from both the Science Union and individual academics, highlighting concerns over perceived inequities in career progression within higher education. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or one-sided sourcing, instead providing multiple viewpoints on the issue

tportalIndependentProgressive21 hr. ago

The main topic of this article is the controversy surrounding a new law in Croatia regarding career advancement opportunities for lecturers in higher education institutions. The article highlights concerns raised by representatives of the Science Syndicate, including Matija Kroflin, who criticized the Ministry of Science, Education, and Youth for failing to address systemic discrimination against lecturers. They argue that while some lecturers, such as those in foreign languages, arts, and other specialized fields, have access to higher academic positions, others—like those teaching physical education, health sciences, mathematics, and history—are denied similar opportunities despite their scientific contributions. Lecturers like Marko Gregurić and Tanja Šestanj-Perić emphasize that the current legal framework restricts career progression and call for reform to ensure equal treatment. The issue has gained traction among over 160 lecturers, who believe the law was intended to correct an oversight rather than create inequality.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic injustice within the educational system, emphasizing the lack of equity in career advancement for lecturers. It presents the grievances of university staff as legitimate and calls for legislative correction, which aligns with progressive values advocating平等

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicProgressive21 hr. ago

The article reports on concerns raised by the Science Syndicate regarding proposed amendments to the Law on Higher Education and Scientific Activity. The syndicate claims that these changes fail to address long-standing discrimination against university lecturers, who still lack equal opportunities for career advancement compared to their colleagues. Matija Kroflin, the main secretary of the Science Syndicate, stated that while the law changes were an opportunity to correct injustices, the Ministry of Science, Education, and Youth missed this chance. He emphasized that the syndicate was the only group advocating for equal career prospects for lecturers within the scientific and higher education system. Lecturer Marko Gregurić highlighted that the current law allows only reappointment within the same title throughout their career, but he and other lecturers seek promotion to the rank of senior lecturer. He noted that his work involves teaching across multiple locations and has a scientific basis, yet the ministry does not provide a rational justification for denying him further advancement. Over 160 lecturers have joined this initiative, and the ministry possesses accurate data on如何

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a systemic injustice within the academic system, emphasizing the lack of equal opportunities for career progression among lecturers. It highlights the efforts of the Science Syndicate to advocate for change, which aligns with progressive values. The tone suggests that