USKOK has launched an investigation against MORH's former procurement chief and Alma Boch, seeking probation.
The Croatian intelligence agency Uskok has initiated an investigation against former head of procurement at the Ministry of Defense, Brigadier Ivo Devčić, and owner of the company Design Vision, Alma Boch, requesting their detention pending trial. The investigation alleges misuse of position and authority, as well as facilitating illegal procurement processes. According to the indictment, between July 2018 and March 2019, Devčić, as head of the Independent Sector for Public Procurement, allegedly arranged for Design Vision to secure contracts through manipulated procurement procedures. This involved splitting a single procurement process into two separate simple procurement procedures, each below the legal threshold, to bypass public procurement laws. Devčić directed calls for tenders exclusively to selected trading companies, including Design Vision. Alma Boch, representing Design Vision, submitted the most favorable price offers in both procedures. To stay within financial limits, Devčić reduced the quantity of boots from 150 to 127 pairs in the first procedure, while the remaining 133 pairs were procured in the second. As a result, the Ministry of Defense and Design Vision are指控
Brigadier Devčić and Business Owner Reject Guilt Over Corruption Allegations, USKOK Seeks Custody Arrest On July 17, 2026, Brigadier Ivica Devčić, former head of procurement for the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Croatia (MORH) and owner of the company Design Vision, were taken into custody by the Croatian Intelligence and Security Service (USKOK) after being searched at their properties in Zagreb, Zadar, and Istria. During interrogation on Friday, both denied the allegations against them, with Devčić reportedly providing detailed explanations regarding the public tender process. However, despite their statements, USKOK has requested the imposition of investigative detention for both individuals, which will be decided by the Zagreb County Court's investigator judge. The case centers around allegations of corruption involving Devčić and his business partner, Alma Boch, who owns Design Vision. USKOK accuses Devčić of abuse of position and authority, while Boch is charged with aiding in such abuse. The investigation was initiated two years ago following a complaint about potential bid rigging in the procurement of military boots for the Croatian Armed Forces. Since then, evidence has pointed to irregularities in the tendering process, particularly during the period from July 2018 to March 2019, when Devčić served as head of the Public Procurement Sector of MORH. According to USKOK, he allegedly arranged for Design Vision to win contracts by manipulating the tendering procedures, including splitting the procurement of 260 pairs of military boots valued at €42,398 (excluding VAT) into two separate tenders, each below the legal threshold. This allowed Design Vision to secure the contract under simplified tender rules, resulting in an estimated unlawful benefit of €25,960 for the company. During the investigation, USKOK stated that Boch, acting on behalf of Design Vision, undertook necessary actions in coordination with Devčić to ensure her company’s bids were selected as the most favorable. The tender process initially saw Design Vision’s offer exceed the threshold for simple tendering, prompting Devčić to reduce the number of boots from 150 to 127 to keep the tender within legal limits. The remaining 133 pairs were then tendered separately, leading to a total contract value exceeding €62,000. USKOK claims that through these actions, Design Vision obtained an unlawful financial gain. In response to the arrests, Minister of Defense Ivan Anušić confirmed that Devčić, still active in the military, will be removed from his position, and that MORH had already taken action against Design Vision in the prior year, banning the company from participating in tenders due to alleged falsification of references. Anušić emphasized that MORH acted promptly and that the current operation is a continuation of efforts begun last year. He stated that similar cases are likely to occur in the future and stressed the importance of timely intervention to prevent companies lacking quality from competing unfairly and benefiting financially at the expense of tax payers. Devčić’s lawyer, Dražen Gazda, expressed disappointment and surprise at the decision to impose investigative detention, noting that Devčić has not been working in his role for some time and thus poses little risk of influencing future decisions. Gazda claimed that his client fully believes in his innocence and has actively defended himself by presenting detailed accounts of the tendering process, asserting that all steps were conducted in accordance with the Law on Public Procurement. Meanwhile, the police have conducted searches of premises associated with the suspects and seized one vehicle capable of traveling 80 kilometers per hour. The ongoing investigation continues to gather evidence against both individuals, with USKOK set to decide whether to open a formal investigation and request investigative detention. The case highlights continued concerns over procurement irregularities within the defense sector, underscoring the need for transparency and accountability in public spending. As the legal proceedings unfold, the outcomes could further shape anti-corruption measures within the Croatian government and its agencies.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
Ivan Anušić, Croatia's Minister of Defense, commented on the arrest of Brigadier Ivica Devčić, who was involved in a procurement scandal at the Ministry of Defense. Devčić, who previously headed the Independent Sector for Public Procurement from 2017 to 2021, is accused of favoring the company Design Vision in military equipment contracts. Anušić stated that the Ministry of Defense (MORH) had already taken action against Design Vision last year by banning its participation in defense tenders due to falsified references. He emphasized that this arrest is part of a broader effort to address corruption and ensure transparency in procurement processes, noting that similar cases are likely to emerge in the future.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the minister's comments regarding the arrest and the actions taken by MORH. It includes direct quotes from Anušić and provides context about the procurement scandal involving Design Vision. The framing appears neutral, focusing on the procedural steps taken
Why factuality (98): This article is very close to the primary source, accurately reflecting the statements made by Minister Anušić regarding the investigation, the actions taken by the Ministry of Defense, and the legal steps being taken against Devčić and Design Vision. It includes precise details about the procuremen
Why objectivity (89): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the minister's comments without introducing personal opinion or emotional language. It focuses on the factual aspects of the investigation and the legal responses.
Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 98Objective 8814 days ago
The article reports on the arrest and investigation of Brigadier Ivica Devčić, former head of procurement at the Ministry of Defense (MORH), and his business partner Alma Boch, owner of Design Vision. The Croatian Intelligence Service (USKOK) alleges that they engaged in abuse of position and authority by manipulating public procurement procedures for military boots. During searches of their properties in Zagreb, Zadar, and Istria, both were detained and questioned by USKOK. They denied the accusations, but the intelligence service requested preventive detention, pending a decision by the Zagreb County Court. The case began two years ago after a complaint was filed against the Public Sector for Military-Police Services of MORH regarding potential fraud. The investigation suggests that Devčić, who was responsible for public procurement at MORH, favored Boch’s company by splitting the procurement process into two separate steps to avoid compliance with public tender laws. USKOK claims that Boch’s company, through coordination with Devčić, secured the contract for 260 pairs of military boots worth 42,398 euros before tax.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the allegations made by USKOK against Devčić and Boch without overtly endorsing either side. It provides factual information about the legal proceedings, the nature of the charges, and the timeline of the investigation. While the subject involves high-level officials and public-
Why factuality (98): This article closely matches the primary source document, providing detailed information about the USKOK investigation into Devčić and Boch, including the charges, the timeline, and the legal procedures followed. It accurately reflects the statements made by the Ministry of Defense and the specifics
Why objectivity (88): The article remains largely neutral, presenting both the accusations and the defense arguments. However, there is a slight leaning towards the official stance of the Ministry of Defense, though this is subtle and does not significantly affect objectivity.
Index.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 97Objective 8814 days ago
Ministar obrane Ivan Anušić komentirao je uhićenja u skandalu oko nabave vojnih čizama, navedenu je da će brigadir Ivica Devčić biti udaljen s radnog mjesta i da će mu biti prekinuta služba. Anušić je objasnio da je Ministarstvo obrane (MORH) prošle godine već poduzelo korake protiv tvrtke Design Vision, koja je bila optužena za lažno prikazivanje referenci i stvaranje ekstraprofila. MORH je 2025. godine donio odluku o isključenju Design Vision iz svih javnih nabava na četiri godine, na temelju članka 68. Uredbe o javnoj nabavi. Odluka je donesena tijekom pregovaračkog postupka za nabavu balističkih zaštitnih ploča, gdje je tvrtka lažno prikazivala svoje činjenice i referencе. Anušić je naglasio da su takvi slučajevi često prisutni i da će se nastaviti reagirati brzo kako bi se spriječilo konkurencija s lošijim kvalitetom i lažnim podacima.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of the Ministry of Defense as proactive and lawful, emphasizing their early intervention against fraudulent practices by Design Vision. The language used suggests a critical stance toward corporate dishonesty and prioritizes transparency and accountability, which align
Why factuality (97): The article aligns well with the primary source, providing accurate information about the USKOK investigation, the charges against Devčić and Boch, and the legal actions taken. It includes specific details about the procurement scandal and the Ministry of Defense's response.
Why objectivity (88): The tone is mostly neutral, but there is a slight emphasis on the Ministry of Defense's proactive approach, which may subtly favor their position, though not strongly enough to impact overall objectivity.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 97Objective 8814 days ago
Minister of Defense Ivan Anušić commented on the arrest related to the procurement of military boots, stating that Brigadier Ivica Devčić would be removed from his position and that his service would be terminated. He emphasized that the Ministry of Defense (MORH) had already taken key steps against questionable practices last year, including banning the company Design Vision from participating in defense tenders due to falsifying references. Anušić described the current action by investigators as a logical continuation of measures taken the previous year and suggested similar cases might arise in the future. He stressed the importance of timely responses to prevent companies from competing with substandard products, false claims, and excessive profits at the expense of taxpayers.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Minister Anušić's statements without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports his comments on actions taken by the Ministry of Defense and acknowledges potential future issues but does not favor one side over another in the narrative.
Why factuality (97): The article closely matches the primary source, accurately reflecting the USKOK investigation, the charges against Devčić and Boch, and the legal procedures followed. It includes specific details about the procurement scandal and the Ministry of Defense's response.
Why objectivity (88): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the facts without introducing personal opinion or emotional language. There is a slight emphasis on the Ministry of Defense's actions, but it remains balanced overall.
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 97Objective 8714 days ago
Bivši šef nabave Ministarstva obrane, brigadir Ivica Devčić, i vlasnica tvrtke Design Vision, Alma Boch, određeni su istražni zatvor u petak na Zagrebčkom županijskom sudu zbog sumnje u nezakonitu povezivanje tvrtke s javnom nabavom. Sumnja se temelji na tome da je Devčić, kao načelnik sektora za javnu nabavu, pokušavao omogućiti tvrtki Design Vision da dobije poslove putem dogovora s Boch. U postupku nabave 260 pari vojničkih čizama, Devčić je naložio podijeliti nabavu u dva postupka ispod zakonskog praga i uputiti pozive isključivo odabranim trgovacima, uključujući Design Vision. Boch je poduzimala radnje koje su omogućile provedbu dogovora, a tvrtka je ostvarila imovinsku korist od 25.960 eura. Ministar obrane Ivan Anušić naveo je da će Devčić biti dalje tretiran unutar ministarstva, što znači prestanak službe.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings against Devčić and Boch in a factual manner, citing official allegations and responses from their lawyer. It does not overtly favor either side but reports on the charges and the legal process. The tone remains neutral, focusing on the procedural aspects of
Why factuality (97): The article aligns well with the primary source, detailing the USKOK investigation, the charges against Devčić and Boch, and the legal proceedings. It includes specific details about the procurement process and the allegations of corruption, matching the information from the index.
Why objectivity (87): While the article presents the facts objectively, there is a minor emphasis on the legal consequences and the role of the Ministry of Defense, which could be seen as slightly more supportive of the state's position, but overall remains balanced.
Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 96Objective 8714 days ago
Ministar obrane Ivan Anušić komentariše uhićenja povezana s istragom USKOK-a o nepropričanoj nabavi vojnih čizama. Navedeno je da je Ministarstvo obrane (MORH) već prošle godine reagiralo na sporne postupke, uključujući udaljavanje brigadira Ivice Devčića s radnog mjesta. USKOK je u akciji uhitio dvije osobe, među kojima je vojna osoba, a Anušić ističe da će se prema osumnjičenom pripadniku Hrvatske vojske postupati sukladno propisima. Također je naglašeno da je MORH ranije zabranio sudjelovanje tvrtke Design Vision na natječajima zbog lažnih referenci. Anušić smatra da je trenutna akcija logičan slijed ranijih postupaka.
Bias read (Center): Artikl neutralno prikazuje situaciju oko uhićenja povezanog s korupcijskom istragom, bez jasne stranih ili lokalne političke perspektive. Ministar obrane objašnjava postupke MORH-a i ističe da su prethodne mjerne već izvršene, što pokazuje balansiran pristup. Nema jasno izraženog stranih stavova pre
Why factuality (96): The article accurately reflects the primary source, detailing the USKOK investigation, the charges against Devčić and Boch, and the legal procedures followed. It includes specific details about the procurement scandal and the Ministry of Defense's response.
Why objectivity (87): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the facts without overt bias. However, there is a slight lean towards the Ministry of Defense's perspective, especially when discussing the timing of their actions and the effectiveness of their measures.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 96Objective 8614 days ago
Bivši šef nabave Ministarstva obrane, brigadir Ivica Devčić, i vlasnica tvrtke Design Vision Alma Boch određeni su na istražni zatvor zbog optužbi poveznih s nezakonitim uticajem na javnu nabavu. Optužba predstavlja dio antikorupcijske akcije Uskoka, u kojoj su uhićeni u četvrtak. Sumira se da je Devčić, kao načelnik sektora za javnu nabavu, zajedno s Boch, organizirao skrivenu dogovor da tvrtka Design Vision dobije poslove putem manje vrijednih nabava, izbjegavajući obavezu javne nabave. U procesu su izvršene dvije jednostavne nabave umjesto jedne, s ciljem da se izbjegne zakonski prag. Prema optužbi, tvrtka je ostvarila nepripadnu imovinsku korist od oko 25.960 eura. Devčić je poricao krivnicu i iznio detalje postupka, tvrdeći da je sve provedeno u skladu s zakonom. Ministar obrane Ivan Anušić objasnio je da će uhićeni djelatnik biti tretiran unutar ministarstva, što znači prekid službe.
Bias read (Center): Artikl neutralno prikazuje optužbu i odgovor stranke, bez jasne političke boje ili preferencije. Istražni zatvor je određen na temelju zakona, a reagovanje ministrstva je formalno objašnjeno. Nema evidentnog slanja ka lijevoj ili desnoj strani, jer se fokusira na pravno stanje i proceduru.
Why factuality (96): The article accurately reflects the primary source document, covering the USKOK investigation, the charges against Devčić and Boch, and the legal actions taken. It includes relevant details about the procurement scandal and the response from the Ministry of Defense.
Why objectivity (86): The tone is generally neutral, but there is a slight inclination toward the Ministry of Defense’s perspective, particularly when discussing the timing of their actions and the effectiveness of their measures against corrupt practices.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8614 days ago
Ministar obrane Ivan Anušić komentirao je uhićenje brigadir Ivice Devčića u kontekstu aferi oko nabave vojnih čizama, objasnivši da će Devčić biti udaljen s radnog mjesta. Anušić je naveo da je Ministarstvo obrane (MORH) prošle godine već poduzело mjere protiv tvrtke Design Vision, koja se povezuje s lažiranjem referenci. On je smatrao da je MORH reagirao pravodobno, a današnju akciju istražitelja opisao kao nastavak procesa koji je započeo prošle godine. Uhićena Alma Boch je dovedena na ispitivanje u USKOK. Anušić je istaknuo važnost brzog reagiranja kako bi se spriječila konkurencija tvrtaka koje laže o kvalitetu proizvoda i stvaraju dodatne prihode na štetu poreznih obveznika.
Bias read (Center): Iako se radi o političkoj temi, članak nema jasno izraženu stransku poziciju. Ministar obrane Ivan Anušić objašnjava akcije MORH-a u okviru zakona i pravila, bez evidentnog optužavanja jedne stranke ili izražavanja personalnog stavljaja. Članak donosi informacije o formalnim koracima i reakcijama, a
Why factuality (95): The article aligns with the primary source, providing accurate information about the USKOK investigation, the charges against Devčić and Boch, and the legal actions taken. It includes specific details about the procurement scandal and the Ministry of Defense's response.
Why objectivity (86): The tone is generally neutral, but there is a slight emphasis on the Ministry of Defense's proactive measures, which may subtly favor their position, though not strongly enough to impact overall objectivity.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 8520 days ago
The Croatian intelligence agency USKOK has expanded an investigation against the mayor of Buzet, Fabrizio Vizintin, along with two Slovenian citizens and a construction company, over allegations of corruption, manipulation of tenders, and money laundering. The investigation suggests that the mayor may have assigned contracts worth 3.86 million euros to the construction company, which earned approximately 1.16 million euros, while the mayor received over 20,000 euros in bribes. Additionally, the former mayor, Jelena Perossa, is accused of facilitating the purchase and lease of municipal land to Slovenians, receiving at least 4,350 euros in bribes. The mayor also suspects that the company owned by the former mayor illegally paid 39,035 euros for translations included in the company’s tender description and disclosed confidential information from the USKOK investigation. USKOK plans to recommend investigative detention for two of the accused but lacks grounds for others, according to the statement.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual allegations from the USKOK investigation without overtly endorsing any political stance. It reports on legal accusations and potential violations without taking sides or using emotionally charged language. While the subject involves high-level officials and corruption, a
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports on the USKOK operation targeting the construction company and officials in Buja, aligning closely with the primary source document. It provides specific details about the alleged corruption, including financial figures and the nature of the offenses, which match the fa
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the facts without overt bias. It focuses on the legal actions taken by USKOK and the charges against the individuals involved, without taking sides or using emotive language.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 8514 days ago
The article reports on an ongoing investigation into two individuals detained by the Croatian Intelligence Service (USKOK) in collaboration with the military police. The Ministry of Defense (MORH) confirmed that one of the detainees is a military personnel suspected of committing corrupt acts in 2018 and 2019. Informally, the first individual is identified as the former head of procurement at the Ministry of Defense, while the second is the owner of a company that supplied military boots to MORH, with suspicions of favoritism during tenders. The case was commented on by Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Defense Ivan Anušić, who stated that the employee of MORH will lose their position, and the involved company had already been banned from operating with MORH last year. Anušić emphasized that the detainee will be treated according to laws and legal frameworks within MORH, including termination of employment and removal from the workplace.
Bias read (Center): While the article discusses corruption allegations involving high-level officials and military institutions, the framing remains neutral. It presents both the actions taken by authorities (detention, termination) and the background of the accused without overtly criticizing or praising either side.
Why factuality (90): This article closely aligns with the primary source, reporting on the ongoing investigation into Devčić and Boch, the actions taken by MORH, and the statements made by Minister Anušić. It provides accurate information about the legal steps and the context of the previous ban on Design Vision. No sig
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting facts and quotes from officials without overtly expressing judgment. It balances the perspectives of both the authorities and the accused, though there is a subtle emphasis on the seriousness of the charges.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8520 days ago
The Croatian anti-corruption agency USKOK has expanded its investigation into alleged corruption related to the sale of land in Istria. The probe now involves five additional individuals and one legal entity, including Croatian and Slovenian citizens suspected of abusing their positions, accepting bribes, and disclosing confidential information from criminal proceedings. According to USKOK, a former employee and later head of the Urban Planning and Municipal Property Department in the city of Buzet allegedly used her position between late 2012 and March 11, 2025, to provide privileged access to information about tenders and documentation to interested buyers of municipal and state-owned land. In exchange, she is suspected of receiving money, including at least €4,000 from a Slovenian citizen in one case. Additionally, USKOK suspects that the mayor of Buzet, Fabrizio Vižintin, along with the director of a company, colluded to secure contracts for the city by artificially splitting public procurement below the threshold requiring open bidding processes. This allowed the company to win contracts worth at least €3.86 million while generating illegal profits of at least €1.16 million.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual allegations made by USKOK, a national anti-corruption authority, without overtly favoring any side. It reports on ongoing investigations involving public officials and potential misuse of power, but does not include biased language, selective sourcing, or editorializing.
Why factuality (90): This article accurately reports on the primary source document, mentioning the arrest of Ivica Devčić and the involvement of Design Vision. It aligns closely with the facts provided in the index, including the timeline and actions taken by the Ministry of Defense.
Why objectivity (85): The tone is neutral and factual, presenting the events without emotional language or bias. It clearly separates the roles of the Ministry of Defense and the implicated parties.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8014 days ago
Alma Boch, owner of the firm Design Vision, was brought in for questioning by USKOK (Croatian Security Services Agency) in Zagreb regarding alleged involvement in corruption related to military procurement. She denied any wrongdoing, claiming she did not assist in the misuse attributed to former head of defense procurement, Brigadier Ivica Devčić. Boch and Devčić were arrested in a joint operation involving USKOK, Zagreb police, Istria police, and Zadar police. The investigation centers on irregularities in the procurement of military boots for special units of the Croatian Army between 2018 and 2019. Investigators suspect Devčić gave preferential treatment to Design Vision during tenders, possibly to displace a major supplier, Kroko. Design Vision received over a million euros from the state budget over seven years for military equipment, including protective clothing and boots.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about arrests and investigations into potential corruption within the Ministry of Defense. It includes statements from both the accused and the ministry, providing balanced perspectives without overtly favoring one side. There is no clear ideological framing,
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on the allegations against Vižintin and Keranović, including the financial figures and the nature of the corruption. It aligns well with the primary source information and provides additional context about the ongoing investigations.
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, focusing on the facts of the case and the legal proceedings. There is no overt bias or emotional language, maintaining an objective stance.
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8016 days ago
In Split, two individuals were arrested on suspicion of corruption, including a police officer accused of leaking sensitive data to members of the narcotics gang led by Marko Benzon. The case was uncovered through the analysis of encrypted communications via the SKY app, where the officer allegedly reported vehicle registrations to drug dealers. The Croatian Intelligence Service (USKOK) has initiated an investigation against three Croatian citizens, alleging abuse of position and encouraging such abuse. One of the suspects is a police officer who, while on annual leave, accessed the Ministry of Internal Affairs' database to check if the vehicles in question belonged to police officers. This information was shared among the suspects, leading to further investigations. USKOK plans to recommend detention for one suspect and a ban on business activities for another.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a corruption investigation involving law enforcement and organized crime, without overtly favoring any political ideology. It reports on the actions of the USKOK and the legal proceedings, maintaining neutrality in its framing. While the subject matter is of
Why factuality (85): This article accurately reflects the primary source document, detailing the arrest of Ivica Devčić and Alma Boch, along with the allegations against them. It aligns with the facts provided in the index, including the timeline and legal actions taken.
Why objectivity (80): The tone is professional and objective, presenting the facts without emotional language or bias. It clearly outlines the charges and the response from the Ministry of Defense.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8017 days ago
The Županijski sud u Splitu has ruled that former Šibenik mayor Maja Šupe is guilty of accepting a bribe, sentencing her to four and a half years in prison. The verdict is deemed unlawful. In the same case, businessman Blaž Petrović received three years in prison, while lawyer Branimir Zmijanović was sentenced to one year and ten months of conditional imprisonment. According to the indictment by the State Security Service (USKOK), Šupe agreed in 2013 to issue a release decision for Petrović in exchange for a bribe of €15,000. The intermediary in the deal was Zmijanović, who allegedly arranged for Šupe to receive €6,000 upfront, with the remaining €9,000 to be paid after the ruling became final. To conceal the payment, a fictitious real estate purchase agreement was created, with the proceeds disguised as part of the sale price. After Petrović was released from charges and the ruling became final in 2014, the remaining amount was reportedly paid out. Šupe had previously been known for issuing a favorable ruling in the case of Tomislav Horvatinčić, whose death was linked to a maritime accident involving a Croatian couple. All three defendants have the right to appeal the ruling.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings and allegations against Maja Šupe, a former local politician, without overtly endorsing or condemning any political faction. It reports on the indictment by USKOK, which is a state security agency, and outlines the legal arguments presented during the trial
Why factuality (85): This article accurately reports on the sentencing of Maja Šupe and Blaž Petrović, aligning with the primary source details about the bribery case. It includes specific amounts and legal procedures, showing good adherence to the facts. The article also mentions the role of the lawyer Zmijanović, whic
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the legal outcomes and evidence without emotional language. It avoids taking sides and presents the facts objectively.
Index.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8017 days ago
A former wife of a man from Šibenik, Maja Šupe, was convicted by the Municipal Court in Split of accepting a bribe and sentenced to four and a half years in prison. She was accused of receiving 15,000 euros from businessman Blaž Petrović in exchange for securing a favorable court ruling in a legal case involving Tomislav Horvatinčić in 2013. The lawyer Branimir Zmijanović acted as an intermediary in this bribery scheme. Šupe did not appear at the sentencing hearing and is required to return the illegal financial gain. The case highlights allegations of corruption within the judiciary, particularly involving local lawyers and judges. Šupe had previously been involved in high-profile cases related to Horvatinčić, including rulings that were later overturned by the Zadar District Court.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings and judicial outcomes without overtly favoring any political ideology. It reports on the conviction of a former spouse and her involvement in a bribery case, which implicates both private individuals and legal professionals. While the subject matter relates
Why factuality (85): The article accurately summarizes the court ruling against Maja Šupe and Blaž Petrović, matching the primary source details. It includes the amount of money involved and the legal process, showing good factual alignment. The article also mentions the role of the lawyer Zmijanović, which is consisten
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, focusing on the legal outcome and the evidence presented. There is no overt bias or emotional language, maintaining an objective stance.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7014 days ago
The Ministry of Defense (MORH) banned the participation of the company Design Vision, owned by recently arrested entrepreneur Alma Boch, in its tenders for four years due to alleged fraud involving references and security conditions for armor plates used in military body armor. Boch was arrested alongside former MORH procurement chief Ivo Devčić, suspected of colluding in the procurement of military boots for elite units. Despite operating from a family home in Zagreb’s Dubrava and employing only one person, the company secured multi-million contracts with MORH between 2018 and 2022, including purchases of boots, berets, caps, thermal underwear, and masks. The procurement process during Devčić’s tenure allegedly favored Boch through non-transparent procedures, allowing her to secure contracts worth over four million kunas. MORH discovered discrepancies in the procurement of ballistic protective plates, leading to the ban on Design Vision’s involvement in future tenders until 2029.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the investigation into alleged corruption within the Ministry of Defense and the subsequent actions taken against the involved parties. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The report includes details,
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on the actions taken by MORH against Design Vision, including the four-year ban and the recent arrests. It references the primary source document regarding the ban from June 2025 and the allegations of false references. However, it adds some details not explicitly ment
Why objectivity (70): The tone leans towards suggesting corruption and unethical behavior, using phrases like 'muljanje s dodjelom poslova' which implies wrongdoing. The article presents the situation primarily from the perspective of MORH and the authorities, showing a slight bias toward condemning the business practice
Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7017 days ago
A criminal investigation has been launched by the Croatian Agency for Combating Organized Crime (USKOK) and the Public Prosecutor's Office in Split, focusing on the issuance of a permit for catering services at Dario Šimić's camp located within his private residence in Tisno. The investigation involves three individuals: former national football player Dario Šimić, former local official Neda Livljanić, and businessman/politician Marin Mikšić. They were summoned under police escort for questioning. USKOK suspects misuse of position and influence, alleging that Livljanić falsely documented a visit to Šimić’s property and issued a permit allowing the establishment of a two-star-rated catering facility, despite the land being outside the construction area and lacking proper infrastructure. Mikšić allegedly facilitated communication between Šimić and Livljanić. Šimić denies wrongdoing, with his lawyer asserting he is not guilty. Investigations into Šimić's business and personal premises have been ongoing, with previous interrogations and searches conducted earlier this year.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the legal proceedings, citing official sources such as USKOK and referencing both the allegations against the accused and their defense. There is no overt ideological framing or emphasis on specific political affiliations. The focus remains on the legal and
Why factuality (85): The article discusses an unrelated case involving Dario Šimić and his camp in Tisno, not related to the primary source document about the military shoe procurement scandal. It mentions the USKOK investigation but does not align with the main event described in the index. The facts presented are not
Why objectivity (70): The tone is more sensational, focusing on the 'camp' issue and using phrases like 'lažni zapisnik' and 'dvije zvjezdice', which may imply bias. The article doesn't present both sides of the story equally.
Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7017 days ago
Dario Šimić, bivši hrvatski nogometni reprezentativac, je utorak bio dovezen na ispitivanje u zagrebačkom sjedištu USKOK-a nakon što je uhićen u okviru antikorupcijske akcije. Šimić je među tri osumnjičena kojima istražitelji povezuju sumnje u nezakonito ishođenje dozvola za kamp u Tisnom. Uhićena je i Neda Livljanić, bivša voditeljica Odjela za turizam pri Službi za gospodarstvo i imovinskopravne poslove nekadašnjeg Ureda državne uprave Šibensko-kninske županije, kojoj se sumnja da je omogućila Šimiću pristup potrebnim dozvolama. Treći uhićeni je Marin Mikšić, vodički poduzetnik i član HSS-a, koji se smatra posrednikom u pribavljanju dokumentacije. Mikšić je bio aktiviran u lokalnoj politici i trenutno je jedan od potpredsjednika HSS-a. Istražitelji su povezali Mikšića i Šimića dugogodišnjim prijateljstvom. Očekuje se odluka o daljnjim procesnim koracima.
Bias read (Center): Članci opisuju antikorupcijsku akciju i učešće političara, ali ne prikazuju jasnu stransku poziciju. Prikazuje se objektivna situacija bez evidentnog slanja ka lijevoj ili desnoj strani. Istraživačka agencija USKOK je neutralna institucija, a svaki učestalac je prikazan kao deo procesa. Nema jasno z
Why factuality (85): Article reports on the arrest of Darija Šimić by USKOK, aligning with primary source details about the investigation into illegal permits for a camp in Tisno. It includes names and roles of those involved but lacks specific references to the MORH military boots procurement case mentioned in the prim
Why objectivity (70): The tone leans towards sensationalism with phrases like 's lisicama na rukama' (with wolves on hands), suggesting a more dramatic narrative than purely factual reporting. The focus on individual arrests without contextualizing the larger corruption network may be seen as selective emphasis.
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 6017 days ago
In a police operation led by the Croatian Intelligence Service (USKOK), former footballer Dario Šimić and former head of the tourism office in Šibenik, Neda Livljanić, were arrested. The operation also included Marina Mikšić, a prominent local politician and member of the ruling coalition in Šibensko-Knin district. Mikšić, who served as mayor of Vodice and president of the local branch of the Croatian Peasants' Party (HSS), was accused of acting as an intermediary between Šimić and Livljanić in an illegal procurement of documents needed for a camp in Tisno. Mikšić had previously been involved in a controversial incident where he physically assaulted a referee during a football match, leading to a one-year ban from football activities. He has close ties with Šimić, including a reported cousin relationship. The HSS announced plans to initiate a process to determine Mikšić’s political responsibility following his arrest, while emphasizing respect for presumption of innocence and legal procedures.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about the arrests and allegations against Marina Mikšić without overtly endorsing or condemning any political stance. It provides factual background on Mikšić’s role in politics, his past actions, and the response from his party, HSS, which emphasizes due process and
Why factuality (85): Article covers a different event (corruption case involving Dario Šimić and others) unrelated to the primary source document about the military boots procurement scandal. While some details about USKOK operations are mentioned, they are not aligned with the main subject. The article lacks direct con
Why objectivity (60): The article has a political tone, focusing on local politics and public figures rather than presenting an objective account of the corruption investigation. It uses emotionally charged language such as 'sramotni incident' and emphasizes the political implications over factual reporting.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 7514 days ago
The Croatian intelligence agency Uskok has initiated an investigation against former head of procurement at the Ministry of Defense, Brigadier Ivo Devčić, and owner of the company Design Vision, Alma Boch, requesting their detention pending trial. The investigation alleges misuse of position and authority, as well as facilitating illegal procurement processes. According to the indictment, between July 2018 and March 2019, Devčić, as head of the Independent Sector for Public Procurement, allegedly arranged for Design Vision to secure contracts through manipulated procurement procedures. This involved splitting a single procurement process into two separate simple procurement procedures, each below the legal threshold, to bypass public procurement laws. Devčić directed calls for tenders exclusively to selected trading companies, including Design Vision. Alma Boch, representing Design Vision, submitted the most favorable price offers in both procedures. To stay within financial limits, Devčić reduced the quantity of boots from 150 to 127 pairs in the first procedure, while the remaining 133 pairs were procured in the second. As a result, the Ministry of Defense and Design Vision are指控
Bias read (Center): The article presents the allegations against Devčić and Boch in a factual manner, citing the indictment and procedural details without overtly favoring either side. It does not exhibit clear ideological slant but focuses on the legal and procedural aspects of the case.
Why factuality (80): This article continues the detailed account of the military procurement scandal, providing additional context about the procurement process and the alleged collusion between Devčić and Design Vision. It aligns with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (75): The tone remains neutral, focusing on the procedural aspects of the procurement and the legal implications. It avoids taking sides or expressing personal opinions.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Croatia
