Shas invokes IDF soldiers in election campaign ad, drawing Gadi Eisenkot's ire
The Shas Party, an ultra-Orthodox political group in Israel, released an election campaign video featuring IDF soldiers to highlight its support for military service, despite ongoing controversies around its conscription policies. The video portrays a family where one son studies at a yeshiva while another serves in the IDF, emphasizing unity and contribution to Israel. This move prompted criticism from the Yashar Party, led by Gadi Eisenkot, who accused Shas of violating election laws by using IDF soldiers in propaganda. Eisenkot argued that Shas has historically promoted draft-evasion policies and expressed pride in non-servicemembers, making the use of soldiers in the video hypocritical. Yashar called for the video's removal and warned of legal action, while Shas defended the video as a counter to what it described as false propaganda from Eisenkot's camp.
Shas Party released a controversial election campaign video featuring IDF soldiers, sparking backlash from the Yashar Party led by Gadi Eisenkot. The video, aired on Saturday evening, depicted a family celebrating a soldier’s return from military service, emphasizing unity between Torah scholars and IDF personnel. Eisenkot, a prominent figure in the opposition bloc aiming to replace Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, condemned the ad, accusing Shas of violating election laws by using IDF soldiers in campaign material. The video, which portrays a typical Israeli family during Shabbat, highlights the contrast between a son studying at a yeshiva and another serving in the military. Shas described the scene as emblematic of its values, faith, tradition, and national unity. The ad concluded with a claim that more than 30,000 soldiers and career-service personnel had voted for the Shas Party in the previous election, a statement the party defended as factual. On Sunday, the Yashar Party issued a formal demand for the video’s removal, asserting that it constituted illegal election propaganda. According to the party’s warning letter, the video created the misleading impression that the IDF endorsed Shas. Eisenkot’s team argued that the ad exploited the sacrifices of soldiers while simultaneously promoting policies they claimed undermined the IDF’s efforts. The Yashar Party cited Shas’s historical position on haredi conscription, noting that the party had supported legislation that critics say failed to address the IDF’s manpower crisis. The Yashar Party’s letter, delivered via legal counsel to Shas leader Aryeh Deri, warned that the demand was a prelude to potential legal action. The letter pointed out that the video explicitly referenced the number of soldiers who had voted for Shas, despite the party’s past advocacy for draft-evasion measures. Yashar emphasized that this contradiction was especially glaring given the ongoing conflict and the heavy reliance on soldiers for national defense. Shas responded by defending the video as a countermeasure against what it called false propaganda from Eisenkot and his allies. The party accused Yashar of misrepresenting its stance, arguing that the ad was meant to refute claims that Shas supported draft evasion. Shas reiterated its commitment to the values of the nation, framing the video as a celebration of diverse contributions to Israeli society. The dispute reflects broader tensions within Israeli politics surrounding the issue of haredi conscription. Shas, a key ally of Prime Minister Netanyahu, has long advocated for policies that prioritize Torah study over mandatory military service. Critics argue that these positions exacerbate the IDF’s recruitment challenges, particularly in light of the ongoing war. Over the past three years, haredi parties have faced mounting pressure to adjust their stances, yet they have largely resisted calls for increased enlistment. Recent legislative developments underscore these divisions. Last month, two bills sponsored by haredi parties, aimed at elevating Torah study as a constitutional value and temporarily halting arrests of draft evaders, passed in the Knesset. These measures sparked widespread controversy, with some families affected by the draft-evader policy expressing outrage. Legal experts warned that the bills could undermine public trust in the military and complicate efforts to stabilize troop numbers. As the October 27 elections approach, the debate over haredi conscription continues to shape political discourse. With Shas facing scrutiny over its use of IDF imagery in campaign materials, the controversy highlights the complex interplay between religious values, national security, and electoral strategy. The outcome of this dispute may influence not only the upcoming vote but also the future direction of Israeli policy on military service.
2 reports
The Jerusalem PostIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 808/23/2026
The Shas Party, an ultra-Orthodox political group in Israel, released an election campaign video featuring IDF soldiers to highlight its support for military service, despite ongoing controversies around its conscription policies. The video portrays a family where one son studies at a yeshiva while another serves in the IDF, emphasizing unity and contribution to Israel. This move prompted criticism from the Yashar Party, led by Gadi Eisenkot, who accused Shas of violating election laws by using IDF soldiers in propaganda. Eisenkot argued that Shas has historically promoted draft-evasion policies and expressed pride in non-servicemembers, making the use of soldiers in the video hypocritical. Yashar called for the video's removal and warned of legal action, while Shas defended the video as a counter to what it described as false propaganda from Eisenkot's camp.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Shas' use of IDF soldiers as hypocritical and politically motivated, aligning with the concerns of the opposition Yashar Party led by Gadi Eisenkot. The emphasis on Shas' historical support for draft evasion and its alleged disregard for serving soldiers reflects a right-leaning批判
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that Shas released a campaign video supporting IDF conscription, which sparked controversy and prompted the Yashar Party to demand its removal. It provides context about Shas' historical position on conscription and mentions the specific content of the video, aligning
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the events neutrally, reporting both sides of the controversy without overt bias. It describes the actions of Shas and the Yashar Party without taking a clear stance on which side is more justified, maintaining a balanced tone throughout.
The Yashar Party has demanded that the Shas Party remove a video they claim improperly uses images of Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers. The Yashar Party alleges that the Shas Party's use of the footage is inappropriate and potentially disrespectful to the military. While the specific content of the video and the nature of the alleged misuse were not detailed in the provided text, the dispute highlights tensions between political parties regarding the portrayal of military personnel in their messaging. Such conflicts often reflect broader ideological differences and the importance of maintaining appropriate representation of national symbols.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual statement regarding a demand by one political party against another, without overtly endorsing or criticizing either side. There is no clear indication of a biased frame or editorial stance toward either the Yashar Party or the Shas Party. The focus remains on the act
Why factuality (50): The article reports a demand from the Yashar Party for the Shas Party to remove a video, alleging improper use of IDF soldiers. However, there is no additional context or sourcing provided to verify the claim or provide background on the parties involved. Without primary sources or cross-source cons
Why objectivity (60): The article presents the demand as a factual statement but lacks nuance. The tone is neutral, though the phrasing 'Improperly uses IDF soldiers' may carry implicit judgment, suggesting a potential bias toward the Yashar Party's position.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.