United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives
Sexist 'Manosphere' is 'as bad for the public as smoking and fast food'
A new report published in The Lancet argues that the online 'Manosphere,' a network of communities promoting misogynistic views and traditional gender roles, should be regulated similarly to tobacco and fast food due to its impact on public health. The researchers contend that these platforms profit from the anger and insecurities of young men, contributing to violence against women, mental health issues, and a reluctance among males to seek help. Professor Sarah Hawkes, a co-author of the study, emphasized that effective regulation requires providing alternative support systems for boys rather than simply removing harmful content. The report highlights that a significant portion of young men engage with such influencers, citing previous data indicating that one in six boys aged six to 15 hold a positive view of controversial figure Andrew Tate. The authors recommend a coordinated response involving governments, schools, and health services, suggesting that algorithms be used to counteract harmful narratives with positive messaging.
A new report published in the medical journal The Lancet argues that the online subculture known as the Manosphere should be classified as a public health crisis. The authors contend that the movement requires regulatory measures comparable to those applied to tobacco and ultra-processed foods. They assert that the current digital landscape profits from the anger and insecurities of young men, creating a commercial ecosystem that mirrors the strategies used by the tobacco industry to shift responsibility onto individuals. The report defines the Manosphere as a diffuse commercial ecosystem and a loose collection of online communities. These groups are united by shared beliefs regarding masculinity, misogyny, and male victimization. At the core of the movement is a perceived crisis of masculinity and a widespread conviction that feminism has systematically disadvantaged men. According to the researchers, these online spaces spread misogynistic ideas, exposing many men and boys to negative portrayals of women and girls. In certain forums, the content suggests that women are weak, should obey men, belong exclusively in the kitchen, and are only capable of motherhood. The authors highlight that the Manosphere has evolved into a lucrative industry. Content creators and hosting platforms generate revenue by promoting the most extreme expressions of misogyny and aggrieved masculinity. The report notes that outrage and grievance are considered beneficial for business within this environment. Consequently, the system rewards the most extreme content. Boys and young men are specifically targeted, with their fears and vulnerabilities exploited for financial gain. The authors compare this dynamic to the tactics of the tobacco and ultra-processed food industries, which frame health harms as the result of individual choices rather than structural conditions. Specifically, the report states that men’s problems are framed as the result of feminism rather than broader societal issues. Masculine identity is commodified through products and paid content that normalize and reinforce health-harming, performance-oriented masculinities. Furthermore, efforts to regulate or moderate this content are frequently characterized as threats to men’s autonomy, which restricts the political space available for intervention. Professor Sarah Hawkes, a co-author of the report and co-founder of the social justice think tank Global 50/50, emphasized that the Manosphere offers boys and young men a sense of belonging, identity, and an explanation for why life feels difficult. She noted that these needs are real. Hawkes warned that a response focused solely on removing the Manosphere without offering a credible alternative would fail. She argued that society needs to provide boys with better options rather than simply telling them what to avoid. Fellow co-author Professor Kent Buse, affiliated with the Department of Global Population Health at Monash University Malaysia, stressed that boys and men are not the problem. Instead, he identified the business model targeting them as the central issue. Buse described the situation as a business model rather than a fringe phenomenon. He predicted that the industry would continue to use the playbook that served the tobacco sector effectively: blaming the individual and labeling regulation as an attack on freedom. Buse asserted that public health possesses a tested toolkit for addressing commercial harms and urged authorities to utilize it. He pointed to the conditions that leave young men isolated and without a secure future, as well as the companies profiting from their anger and insecurity, as the root causes. The report outlines several specific health harms associated with the Manosphere. These include increased violence against women and girls, mental health issues, and the delegitimization of help-seeking behaviors among boys and men. Previous research cited in the coverage indicates that approximately 63 percent of young men watch masculinity influencers. Additionally, one in six boys aged six to 15 reportedly holds a positive opinion of Andrew Tate, a controversial influencer discussed in relation to the Manosphere. The Children’s Society has warned that such views can escalate into physical and sexual violence against women and girls when they become extremely distorted. To address these issues, the authors propose a coordinated response involving governments, schools, health services, and community organizations. This approach should mirror the public health responses to risks like obesity or smoking. Key recommendations include boosting employment opportunities, improving skills training to enhance job access, and re-engaging boys in education. The report also calls for equitable access to mental health and other frontline health services designed to reach this demographic. Regarding communication strategies, the authors advise avoiding narratives that frame masculinity as inherently toxic or boys and men as inherently problematic. Regulation should focus on online platforms rather than users. This approach draws a parallel to bans on tobacco advertisements directed at children, rather than criminalizing smokers. Mark Brooks, the policy and communications director at the Centre for Policy Research on Men and Boys, welcomed the report’s stance. He noted that the Manosphere discussion has often incorrectly positioned all men and boys as the problem, ignoring the broader economic, educational, and cultural challenges driving their engagement. Brooks added that not all men and boys engage with this content equally, and his organization is currently conducting research to identify who is most at risk. Contextual to the rise of this discourse, Louis Theroux investigated the misogynist world for a documentary after hearing his own sons discuss Andrew Tate in 2022. Meanwhile, prosecutors in the United Kingdom have lodged a formal request for the extradition of Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan Tate from the United States to face charges of rape and sex trafficking. The report concludes that the Manosphere is best understood and addressed as a public health problem, requiring immediate action to mitigate its detrimental effects on society.
A new report published in The Lancet argues that the 'manosphere' and online misogyny should be addressed by governments as public health issues, comparable to responses for obesity or smoking. The authors describe the manosphere as a lucrative commercial ecosystem that profits from promoting extreme misogyny and aggrieved masculinity, noting that it frames men's struggles as results of feminism rather than structural conditions. Prof Kent Buse, a co-author, stated that the phenomenon operates like a business model rewarding outrage, similar to historical tobacco marketing strategies. The report highlights factors such as educational disengagement, loneliness, and financial insecurity that make young men vulnerable to these online communities. Experts emphasize that effective solutions require providing alternative support systems and addressing underlying societal conditions, rather than solely removing harmful content.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through a progressive lens, citing experts who advocate for state intervention and regulatory action against private commercial entities. It explicitly aligns the proposed solution with public health models used for corporate harms (like tobacco), a stance typically held
Why factuality (95): Highly accurate representation of the Lancet report. Correctly identifies the publication venue, quotes specific definitions and arguments from the authors, and attributes statements clearly to Prof Kent Buse. No extraneous or incorrect information detected.
Why objectivity (85): Maintains a neutral journalistic tone. While the subject matter is inherently critical of the manosphere, the article presents the researchers' views objectively using direct quotes and clear attribution ('experts have said'). Avoids unnecessary adjectives or editorializing beyond what is quoted fro
A new report published in The Lancet argues that the 'manosphere' should be addressed as a public health issue similar to the tobacco industry. The study defines the manosphere as a commercial ecosystem of online communities centered on beliefs regarding masculinity, misogyny, and male victimization. Authors contend that these platforms exploit the insecurities of boys and young men for profit, contributing to violence against women and adverse mental health outcomes. The report suggests that current regulatory efforts are often framed as attacks on men's autonomy, which restricts political space for intervention. Co-authors emphasize that the core issue is the business model profiting from grievance rather than the individuals involved, advocating for public health tools to counter these commercial harms.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the manosphere primarily as a harmful commercial enterprise comparable to the tobacco industry, emphasizing systemic exploitation and the need for state-level public health interventions. It highlights the movement's role in delegitimizing help-seeking behavior and reinforcing 'to
Why factuality (92): Faithfully conveys the main findings of the report, including the definition of the manosphere and the comparison to tobacco/ultra-processed foods. Accurately cites the Lancet publication and includes relevant quotes regarding the commercial nature of the ecosystem. Slight truncation at the end prev
Why objectivity (88): Neutral and balanced presentation. Uses standard reporting verbs ('academics have called for') and relies on direct quotes to convey the strong opinions of the researchers. Does not inject personal bias or inflammatory language outside of the attributed quotes.
A new report published in The Lancet argues that the online 'Manosphere,' a network of communities promoting misogynistic views and traditional gender roles, should be regulated similarly to tobacco and fast food due to its impact on public health. The researchers contend that these platforms profit from the anger and insecurities of young men, contributing to violence against women, mental health issues, and a reluctance among males to seek help. Professor Sarah Hawkes, a co-author of the study, emphasized that effective regulation requires providing alternative support systems for boys rather than simply removing harmful content. The report highlights that a significant portion of young men engage with such influencers, citing previous data indicating that one in six boys aged six to 15 hold a positive view of controversial figure Andrew Tate. The authors recommend a coordinated response involving governments, schools, and health services, suggesting that algorithms be used to counteract harmful narratives with positive messaging.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue through a progressive lens, explicitly comparing the cultural phenomenon to public health hazards like smoking and advocating for state intervention and regulation. It relies heavily on quotes from a social justice think tank and emphasizes the protection of women and 'v
Why factuality (78): Accurately reports the core claim that researchers want the manosphere treated as a public health issue comparable to smoking. However, it includes an unrelated sentence about King Charles departing The Bahamas, which appears to be a copy-paste error or layout artifact, reducing overall reliability.
Why objectivity (45): Uses emotionally charged and judgmental language such as 'Sexist,' 'dangerous,' and 'misogynist.' The headline frames the topic negatively before presenting facts, and the inclusion of the unrelated King Charles line suggests poor editing standards.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.