The article discusses allegations against Damijan Jaklin, a member of the New Slovenia (NSi) party, regarding potential corruption involving the use of fictitious contracts and shell companies to receive over 60,000 euros, mostly in cash. These accusations relate to a construction project for a water pipeline worth millions of euros. The case is nearing the filing of a direct indictment, indicating that authorities have concrete evidence. Professor Miho Šepec, a criminal law expert, explains that the testimony of a whistleblower who was involved in these corrupt activities could be a strong piece of evidence for the prosecution. He notes that such testimony makes it difficult for the defense to discredit the claims, especially if there are additional documentary evidence, money, or similar proof. The article also mentions that the alleged crimes include abuse of position, acceptance of bribes, and money laundering, which carry severe penalties including prison terms of up to eight years.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about potential corruption allegations against a political figure but does not take a clear ideological stance. It provides balanced legal analysis from a professor of criminal law, discussing both the strength of the evidence and the challenges faced by the defense.






