Senior CPI(M) leader P K Sreemathi to move police over fake pension claim

The HinduIndependentConservative4 hr. ago

Kerala CPI(M) leader P.K. Sreemathy, a former health minister, plans to file criminal and civil defamation lawsuits against individuals and organizations spreading false claims that she received an illegal pension by impersonating an MLA's wife. The allegations emerged from online news platforms citing purported RTI documents, which she denies. Sreemathy stated that the misinformation damaged her reputation and caused mental distress, prompting her to seek legal redress. She emphasized that the campaign targeted her public image and criticized media outlets for failing to verify claims before publication.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the controversy as a deliberate attack on Sreemathy's public reputation, implying a political motive behind the false claims. While the subject involves a political figure, the framing emphasizes the personal harm and potential political sabotage, aligning more with right-leaning

Hindustan TimesIndependentCenteryesterday

Senior CPI(M) leader P K Sreemathi announced plans to report a social media campaign accusing her of receiving a family pension in the name of a deceased MLA named Krishnan. She denied the allegations, stating that no MLA by that name has ever served in the Kerala Assembly and that she has never received any legislators' family pension. Sreemathi criticized the campaign as defamatory and emotionally damaging, claiming it portrays her as greedy and unethical. She described the spread of these rumors through YouTube channels targeting Malayali communities both within and outside India. She vowed to take legal action against those responsible, including filing defamation cases and contacting several authorities, including the Director General of Police and the Chief Minister.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Sreemathi's denial of the allegations and her decision to pursue legal action, without overtly endorsing or criticizing her position. It reports the controversy objectively, highlighting both the accusations and her rebuttal. While the issue involves political figures and reputa