Senior advocate Jibrin Samuel Okutepa, a respected figure in Nigerian legal circles, has publicly condemned the recent Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) national officers' election, declaring that he has lost faith in the association. The election, which concluded with the selection of Oyinkansola Badejo-Okusanya as the 33rd president, has sparked controversy among legal professionals and observers. Okutepa, known for his candid critiques of judicial and institutional practices, accused the NBA of losing its core values of credibility, objectivity, honesty, and integrity. The election, conducted electronically over 24 hours, saw Badejo-Okusanya secure 12,317 votes, defeating competitors Lateef Omoyemi Akangbe and Olumuyiwa Akinboro. She became the first woman to hold the presidency of the NBA, a milestone noted by many. Other positions within the association were filled through the same electronic voting system, resulting in the appointment of several new officials, including Oghenero Okoro as first vice president and Afam Okeke as general secretary. Despite these developments, Okutepa dismissed the entire process as a "sham coronation," alleging that the election was manipulated to ensure a predetermined outcome. He criticized the composition of the Electoral Committee of the NBA (ECNBA), arguing that it lacked independence and was effectively controlled to favor a specific candidate. According to Okutepa, the ECNBA's role in overseeing the election was compromised, undermining the legitimacy of the proceedings. The low voter turnout further fueled skepticism. Only 26,184 of the 82,172 registered voters participated, representing a participation rate of 31.86 percent. This figure raised questions about the engagement of the legal community with the association’s leadership and decision-making processes. Badejo-Okusanya, addressing the results shortly after they were announced, expressed gratitude for the support she received and emphasized her commitment to transforming the NBA into a more effective and inclusive institution. She outlined her vision of a "Bolder Bar That Works for Everyone," promising improvements in lawyers' welfare and a more responsive association. Her campaign platform included pledges to lead with integrity, courage, humility, fairness, and accountability. In contrast, Okutepa accused legal professionals of complicity in the perceived irregularities, suggesting that many had remained silent despite the evident flaws in the electoral process. He pointed out the contradiction in how some lawyers criticize governmental misconduct yet fail to challenge similar issues within the NBA. The election has ignited a broader debate about the state of professionalism and democracy within the legal sector. While Badejo-Okusanya has been lauded for her historic achievement, critics argue that the process fell short of true representation and transparency. Legal associations and bar councils across Nigeria will likely face increased scrutiny in the coming weeks as discussions continue over the implications of the election and the path forward for the NBA.
1 reports
Premium Times NigeriaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 703 days agoSenior Advocate of Nigeria Jibrin Samuel Okutepa has criticized the recent Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) national officers' election, accusing it of being rigged and undermining the organization's credibility. He claims the election, which resulted in Oyinkansola Badejo-Okusanya becoming the 33rd president, was 'stage-managed' and lacked transparency, with the Electoral Committee allegedly biased toward producing a predetermined outcome. Okutepa argues that the election stripped the NBA of its integrity and warned of negative impacts on the legal profession. The election saw low voter turnout, with only 31.86% of registered voters participating, and Badejo-Okusanya, the only female candidate, winning despite opposition from other candidates.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the NBA election as a corrupt and politically motivated event, emphasizing manipulation and lack of fairness. The critique aligns with progressive values that prioritize transparency and accountability in institutional leadership. While the article does not explicitly endorse any党
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a credible claim made by a senior advocate, Jibrin Samuel Okutepa, who publicly criticized the NBA election. It accurately summarizes his allegations regarding manipulation, lack of independence in the Electoral Committee, and the perceived bias in the outcome. The article cit
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the criticism from a senior advocate but frames it through his perspective, using emotionally charged language like 'sham coronation' and 'teleguided.' While it does not explicitly take sides, the tone leans toward skepticism of the NBA's legitimacy, which may influence reader p
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
NG
