ON
← Back to feed
The Senate Judiciary Committee has endorsed the nomination of Trump's former lawyer for Attorney General.
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter13 hr. ago

The Senate Judiciary Committee has endorsed the nomination of Trump's former lawyer for Attorney General.

The Senate Judiciary Committee has approved the nomination of Acting Attorney General Todd Blaine for a permanent position leading the Department of Justice. The vote was 12 Republican votes to 10 Democratic votes, with confirmation expected soon by the full Senate. Blaine has been serving as acting attorney general since April, following the resignation of Pam Bondi under President Donald Trump. His nomination faced scrutiny earlier this week after two Republican senators, John Cornyn and Thom Tillis, requested the cancellation of a $1.8 billion fund intended to compensate victims of alleged political bias in the previous Biden administration. Blaine later withdrew the order establishing the fund, securing support from both senators. However, Democrats argue that his potential conflict of interest with Trump’s personal interests makes him unsuitable for leadership. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse raised concerns about a pending Florida Supreme Court case alleging that Blaine misled the court during the settlement process. A group of 35 former federal judges accused Blaine of misleading the court in the Trump tax fraud case.

The Senate Judiciary Committee has approved the nomination of Todd Blanche, former legal counsel to President Donald Trump, to serve as the permanent head of the Department of Justice. The vote occurred today with 12 Republican votes in favor and 10 Democratic votes against. The confirmation process will proceed to the full Senate later this week, according to American media reports. Blanche has been serving as acting attorney general since April, following the resignation of his predecessor, Pam Bondi, who was dismissed by President Trump. Prior to joining the administration, Blanche served as one of Trump’s attorneys. His nomination had already come under scrutiny earlier in the week after two Republican senators, John Cornyn and Thom Tillis, requested a written withdrawal of nearly $1.8 billion in funds allocated for a fund compensating victims of alleged political bias in the justice system during the previous Biden administration. President Trump had previously sued the Internal Revenue Service over several hundred million dollars in potential tax refunds based on the disclosure of his tax returns. His Department of Justice had reached an agreement establishing the fund and granting immunity to Trump and members of his family from investigations into possible tax fraud until the settlement was finalized. On Sunday, Blanche formally rescinded the order to establish the fund, securing support from both senators. However, the agreement remains in place, shielding Trump, his eldest son, and the Trump Organization from audits. According to U.S. media estimates, any audit of Trump could cost over $100 million. Democratic senators argue that due to the alleged protection of Trump's personal interests, Blanche is unsuitable to lead the Department of Justice. During a hearing, Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse raised concerns about an open proceeding at the federal court in Florida, where allegations have surfaced that Blanche may have misled the court during the resolution process. He noted that this represents one of the most serious potential charges against a legal representative or judicial officer. A group of 35 former federal judges had previously requested the reopening of the case involving Trump and the IRS, and Blanche was accused of misleading the court. Tillis, who announced his support for Blanche after the fund’s cancellation, sharply criticized the alleged politically motivated use of the judicial system both during the previous Democratic administrations and currently under Trump’s leadership.

1 reports

N1 Slovenija logoN1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6513 hr. ago
The Senate Judiciary Committee has endorsed the nomination of Trump's former lawyer for Attorney General.

The Senate Judiciary Committee has approved the nomination of Acting Attorney General Todd Blaine for a permanent position leading the Department of Justice. The vote was 12 Republican votes to 10 Democratic votes, with confirmation expected soon by the full Senate. Blaine has been serving as acting attorney general since April, following the resignation of Pam Bondi under President Donald Trump. His nomination faced scrutiny earlier this week after two Republican senators, John Cornyn and Thom Tillis, requested the cancellation of a $1.8 billion fund intended to compensate victims of alleged political bias in the previous Biden administration. Blaine later withdrew the order establishing the fund, securing support from both senators. However, Democrats argue that his potential conflict of interest with Trump’s personal interests makes him unsuitable for leadership. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse raised concerns about a pending Florida Supreme Court case alleging that Blaine misled the court during the settlement process. A group of 35 former federal judges accused Blaine of misleading the court in the Trump tax fraud case.

Bias read (Center): While the article discusses a politically sensitive nomination and includes allegations against Blaine, it presents multiple perspectives including both Republican and Democratic viewpoints. It reports on the procedural aspects of the nomination, the legal controversies surrounding the fund, and the

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports the Senate Judiciary Committee's approval of Todd Blanche's nomination as permanent Attorney General, citing 12 Republican votes and 10 Democratic votes. It provides context about Blanche's role as acting attorney general since April and his previous position as Trump'

Why objectivity (65): The tone leans slightly towards supporting Trump's administration by highlighting the approval of Blanche's nomination and the legal protections in place. While it presents both sides (mentioning Democratic senators' concerns), the emphasis on the settlement and the potential cost of a review sugges

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories