The Senate of Nigeria on Thursday rejected a motion aimed at reviewing the process for evaluating, considering, and awarding contracts in the National Assembly. The motion, which sought to align procurement practices with parliamentary regulations and the approved budget, was withdrawn after opposition from lawmakers who argued that the Senate leadership had yet to address key concerns related to the assembly's financial management. The motion was introduced by Sunday Karimi, Chairman of the Senate Services Committee, representing the All Progressives Congress (APC). He proposed the creation of an Internal Tenders Board to oversee procurement decisions within the framework of the National Assembly’s budgetary allocations. According to Karimi, such a board would enhance the autonomy of the National Assembly as stipulated by the Constitution. He also called for the immediate constitution of the board by the Clerk to the National Assembly, along with the issuance of operational guidelines. However, the proposal faced strong resistance from many senators. Adamu Aliero, a member of the APC from Kebbi Central, argued that the focus should instead be on establishing a Budget and Research Office to improve transparency and accountability in financial management. Aliero pointed out that the lack of a dedicated office for budget oversight has contributed to confusion and inefficiency in managing the National Assembly’s finances. He emphasized that senators were often uninformed about the specifics of the budget, making it difficult to assess the effectiveness of current procurement processes. Aliero further noted that the absence of a clear understanding of the budget’s allocation and usage made it premature to discuss reforms to the contract award process. “We don’t even see the budget of the National Assembly being presented here so that we can interrogate and understand the lines of expenditure,” he said, urging the Senate to prioritize internal reforms before addressing external procurement procedures. Senate President Godswill Akpabio echoed similar sentiments, stating that the motion was premature and lacked proper consultation. He criticized Karimi for not discussing the proposal with him, the Clerk to the National Assembly, and other senior officials beforehand. Akpabio emphasized the need for a thorough understanding of the National Assembly’s budget, including the amounts allocated for various projects and their intended purposes, before engaging in debates over procurement reforms. Akpabio also highlighted recent controversies surrounding the renovation of the National Assembly chambers, noting that he had previously threatened to hold the contractor responsible for the project accountable due to repeated technical failures in the newly installed audio system. During a plenary session on Wednesday, faulty microphones caused echoes and distorted sound, prompting Akpabio to take action against the contractor. In response to Akpabio’s criticism, Karimi withdrew the motion, acknowledging the need for greater coordination and clarity before introducing such proposals. The rejection of the motion underscores ongoing challenges in balancing legislative oversight with effective financial governance, as well as the complexities of implementing structural reforms within a large and complex institution like the National Assembly.
3 reports
Premium Times NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 902 days agoSenators in Nigeria have defended the National Assembly's focus on amending the constitution to establish state police forces, arguing that rising insecurity justifies the priority. They clarified that other constitutional reforms are not being ignored but are being addressed in stages. The Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, emphasized that security remains the top concern for Nigerians, making state police a critical reform. Senator Abba Moro explained that the Constitution Review Committee intentionally segmented the amendment process to expedite urgent matters like state police. Ali Ndume, chairing the Senate Committee on Army, stressed that security is the government's primary responsibility and that constitutional changes should reflect current needs. He called for constructive feedback from the public and media. Other senators, including Anthony Ani, agreed that addressing the most pressing issue—security—should come first.
Bias read (Center): While the article discusses a politically sensitive topic (constitutional reform and security), the framing appears balanced. Multiple senators from different parties (APC and PDP) express similar viewpoints, emphasizing urgency due to security threats. There is no overt ideological slant or one-way
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reflects the content of the Premium Times Nigeria primary source document regarding MTN data usage explanations. It presents the information clearly and aligns with the official statements from MTN. However, it lacks direct quotes from the original document, which slightly red
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone and presents the information objectively without bias or emotional language. It provides balanced explanations and avoids taking sides on the issue of data theft.
Premium Times NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 855 days ago Senate rejects motion to review contract award process in National Assembly.The Nigerian Senate recently rejected a motion aimed at reviewing the contract award process within the National Assembly. The motion, introduced by Senator Sunday Karimi of the APC, sought to establish an Internal Tenders Board to oversee procurement decisions in line with the approved budget and financial regulations. However, the proposal faced opposition from several senators who argued that the National Assembly needs to first address broader budgetary and administrative shortcomings before focusing on procurement reforms. Senate President Godswill Akpabio stated that the motion was premature and emphasized the need for lawmakers to thoroughly understand the National Assembly's budget before making any changes to the procurement process. Critics of the motion, such as Senator Adamu Aliero, suggested that the Assembly should prioritize setting up a Budget and Research Office to improve financial oversight.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the proponent's argument for reform and the opposition's concerns without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both supporters and opponents of the motion, providing balanced perspectives on the issue. There is no evident editorializing or biased phr
Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports the Senate's rejection of the motion to review the contract award process. It includes relevant details about the motion, the sponsor, and the rationale behind the rejection. However, it cuts off mid-sentence, which may affect completeness.
Why objectivity (85): The article remains largely objective, presenting both sides of the argument without overt bias. It reports the positions of different stakeholders fairly but could have included more context on the broader implications of the decision.
Premium Times NigeriaIndependentCenteryesterday State Police: Reps move to align with Senate on Tinubu’s proposalThe Nigerian House of Representatives Committee on Constitution Review has expressed openness to adopting the Senate's version of the state police bill, which was passed by the Senate earlier. Chairman Benjamin Kalu stated that the committee would use the Senate's amendments as a working document, with only minor modifications. This marks a collaborative effort between the two legislative chambers to expedite the constitutional amendment process related to establishing state police forces. The House had previously rescinded its approval of a different constitutional amendment bill on the same issue, allowing for the consideration of President Tinubu's executive proposal. The committee expects minimal changes to the bill, as it aligns closely with prior discussions and includes provisions such as Section 318 for interpretation and transitional measures.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the legislative process, highlighting the cooperation between the House of Representatives and the Senate. It reports on the procedural steps taken by both chambers without overtly favoring either side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the technical
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
NG
